Cited by 33Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychiatric care and mental health services

Frequencies and Predictors of Negative Effects in Routine Inpatient and Outpatient Psychotherapy: Two Observational Studies

Open access
Gerke, Leonie, Meyrose, Ann-Katrin, Ladwig, Inga, Rief, Winfried, Nestoriuc, Yvonne·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Negative effects of psychotherapy include side effects, malpractice, and unethical behavior. Its' setting-specific frequencies and predictors are mostly unknown. The aim of the two presented studies is to investigate NEP and its predictors systematically across different treatment settings. In study 1, N=197 patients of a German outpatient center were recruited on average 3.76 years after termination of psychotherapy. In study 2, data from N=118 patients of two German inpatient clinics were collected at admission (t0), discharge (t1), and 9-months follow-up (t2). All participants evaluated negative effects of their previous out-or inpatient psychotherapy and a priori hypothesized predictors. Inpatients reported significantly more side effects (U = 14347, z = 4.70 p < .001, r = 0.26) and malpractice and unethical behavior (U = 14168, z = 5.21, p < .001, r = 0.29) than outpatients. At least one side effect was reported by 37.3% of inpatients (t2) and 15.2% of outpatients. Frequently reported side effects were "experiencing more downs since the end of my therapy" by inpatients (t2; 16.1%) and "having trouble finding insurance or being worried about applying for new insurance" by outpatients (4.6%). At least one case of malpractice and unethical behavior was reported by 28.8% of inpatients (t2) and 7.1% of outpatients. Frequently reported cases were "being hurt by what the therapist said to me" by inpatients (t2; 20.3%) and "feeling forced to do things I did not want to do (e.g. confrontations, role plays)" by outpatients (4.1%). Rates of severe malpractice in form of breaking confidentiality, physical and sexual abuse were less than 1% in both settings. Predictors of side effects were prior experience with psychotherapy and current interpersonal difficulties. Predictors of malpractice and unethical behavior were a poor therapeutic alliance and prior negative experience with malpractice and unethical behavior. Negative effects of psychotherapy are common in both, in-and outpatient settings. Inpatients are at higher risk for negative effects of psychotherapy than outpatients. In order to safeguard patients' wellbeing, the systematic assessment and distinction of side effects and malpractice and unethical behavior should gain more attention in research and clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02144

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies using the INEP found side effects in 15-20% of mixed outpatient CBT samples in university clinics.

    “Two studies using the INEP found side effects in 15-20% of mixed outpatient CBT samples in university clinics (Gerke et al., 2020;Nestoriuc & Rief, 2013).”

    From Effective—and Tolerable: Acceptance and Side Effects of Intensified Exposure for Anxiety Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as Gerke et al., 2020

    The Results (Study 1) report that 15.2% of outpatients experienced at least one side effect; the Methods describe a cognitive-behavioral outpatient center accepting patients irrespective of diagnosis. This paper’s second study was inpatient, not another outpatient CBT sample, and our copy does not identify the outpatient center as a university clinic. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Side effects as measured with the INEP have been linked to poorer therapeutic alliance, more interpersonal difficulties, higher treatment expectations, and lower treatment satisfaction.

    “Side effects as measured with the INEP have been linked to poorer therapeutic alliance (measured with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire), more interpersonal difficulties (measured with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, Gerke, Meyrose, Ladwig, Rief, & Nestoriuc, 2020), higher treatment expectations (Abeling, Müller, Stephan, Pollmann, & De Zwaan, 2018;Rheker, Beisel, Kräling, & Rief, 2017)”

    From Effective—and Tolerable: Acceptance and Side Effects of Intensified Exposure for Anxiety Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as Gerke, Meyrose, Ladwig, Rief, & Nestoriuc, 2020

  • The most frequent side effects in this study were (fear of) treatment stigma, insurance problems, low mood, the experience to depend on the therapist and conflicts with patients' partners.

    “The most frequent side effects in this study were (fear of) treatment stigma, insurance problems, low mood, the experience to depend on the therapist and conflicts with patients' partners”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerke, L., Meyrose, A.-K., Ladwig, I., Rief, W., & Nestoriuc, Y.
Affiliations
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Gerke, Leonie
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-08-25
Volume
11
Pages
2144-2144
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3080174800
Cited by
33
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
malpractice, inpatient psychotherapy, outpatient psychotherapy, therapeutic relationship, interpersonal problems, patient-reported outcomes, breach of confidentiality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review