Cited by 225Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Patient experience of negative effects of psychological treatment: results of a national survey

Open access
Crawford, Mike J., Thana, Lavanya, Farquharson, Lorna, Palmer, Lucy, Hancock, Elizabeth, Bassett, Paul, Clarke, Jeremy, Parry, Glenys D.·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: To make informed choices, patients need information about negative as well as positive effects of treatments. There is little information about negative effects of psychological interventions. Aims: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for perceived negative effects of psychological treatment for common mental disorders. Method: Cross-sectional survey of people receiving psychological treatment from 184 services in England and Wales. Respondents were asked whether they had experienced lasting bad effects from the treatment they received. Results: Of 14 587 respondents, 763 (5.2%) reported experiencing lasting bad effects. People aged over 65 were less likely to report such effects and sexual and ethnic minorities were more likely to report them. People who were unsure what type of therapy they received were more likely to report negative effects (odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI 1.22–1.87), and those that stated that they were given enough information about therapy before it started were less likely to report them (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.54–0.79). Conclusions: One in 20 people responding to this survey reported lasting bad effects from psychological treatment. Clinicians should discuss the potential for both the positive and negative effects of therapy before it starts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162628

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2012, IAPT Three-Year Report: The First Million Patients
  2. 2013, Second Round of the National Audit of Psychological Therapies for Anxiety and Depression (NAPT). National Report 2013
  3. Reuter, 2014, Non-response to therapy in acute and rehabilitative psychosomatic inpatient care – a systematic review, Z Psychosom Med Psychother, 60
  4. 2011, National Audit of Psychological Therapies for Anxiety and Depression. National Report 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, M. J., Thana, L., Farquharson, L., Palmer, L., Hancock, E., Bassett, P., Clarke, J., & Parry, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Centre for Mental Health (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Crawford, Mike J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-03
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
260-265
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2291190402
Cited by
225
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11
FWCI
30.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
adverse effects, patient experience, common mental disorders, psychotherapy, prevalence, risk factors, older adults, informed consent, patient information
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Psychotherapy, Risk Factors, Wales, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review