Cited by 7Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Money lies and extramarital ties: Predicting separate and joint occurrences of financial deception and extramarital infidelity

Open access
Dew, Jeffrey P., Saxey, Matthew T., Mettmann, Alison·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Introduction: Although spouses frequently financially deceive each other (MFD; i.e., marital financial deception), few studies have examined this relationship behavior. The purpose of our study is to examine predictors of separate and joint occurrences of MFD and extramarital affairs (EMI). We chose the predictors we tested using social exchange theory (SET). Methods: We used a national sample of married individuals and multinomial logistic regression analyses to examine how different predictors were associated with membership in three different groups (MFD with no EMI, EMI with no MFD, and both MFD and EMI) relative to the group of participants who reported neither behaviors. Results: Relationship satisfaction was associated with a lower likelihood of being in the MFD-only group, moral commitment was negatively associated with membership in both EMI groups, and personal dedication commitment was negatively associated with membership in both MFD groups. Flirting with someone other than one’s spouse was positively associated with being in all three groups relative to the reference group. The personal importance of religion was not associated with group membership. Discussion: Moral commitment, personal dedication commitment, and flirting with someone other than one’s spouse predicted these two types of marital deception. It is likely that other issues that affect marital outcomes, comparisons, and monitoring alternatives to the relationship may predict MFD and/or EMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038169

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remaining in the marriage is negatively associated with extramarital infidelity and possibly financial marital deception.

    “To remain in the marriage was found to be negatively associated with EMI and possibly MFD.”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

  • Personal dedication commitment (marital stability and trust) is negatively associated with financial marital deception.

    “Recent research about MFD and EMI found that personal dedication commitment (in the form of marital stability and trust of one’s partner) is negatively associated with MFD [87].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Johnson M. P. Caughlin J. P. Huston T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: personal, moral, and structural. J. Marriage Fam. 61, 160– 177. doi: 10.2307/35389 · DOI
  2. National Endowment for Financial Education. (2018). Celebrate Relationships, but beware of Financial Infidelity. Available at: https://www.nefe.org/Press-Room/News/Celebrate-Relationships-But-Beware-of-Financial-Infidelity (Accessed September 6, 2022).
  3. Scheeren P. Apellániz I. A. Wagner A. (2018). Marital infidelity: the experience of men and women. Trends Psychol. 26, 371– 385. doi: 10.9788/tp2018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dew, J. P., Saxey, M. T., & Mettmann, A.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Dew, Jeffrey P.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
13
Pages
1038169-1038169
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309699775
Cited by
7
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Brigham Young University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
adultery, social exchange theory, moral commitment, relationship satisfaction, flirting, married couples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review