Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSport Psychology and PerformanceFlow Experience in Various Fields

RETRACTED: Effects of “Mindfulness Acceptance Insight Commitment” Training on Flow State and Mental Health of College Swimmers: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study

Open access
Ning, Jun-hui, Hao, Qing-wei, Huang, Da-cai·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

This research explores the intervention effect of the mindfulness acceptance insight commitment (MAIC) training program on the mindfulness level, flow state, and mental health of college swimmers. A sample of 47 college swimmers from a regular university was recruited and randomly divided into two groups before the intervention. Independent variables between groups are psychological training mode (MAIC training/no training), and the independent variable within group was time (pre-test, post-test, and continuity test). The dependent variables are mindfulness level, flow state, and mental health (anxiety, depression, training, and competition satisfaction). Results show that after the intervention of MAIC training, the mindfulness level of athletes' flow state has been significantly improved, whereas anxiety and depression significantly decreased. In addition, the satisfaction with training and competition significantly improved. In the continuous stage after the intervention, the mindfulness level, flow state, and mental health of athletes are still significantly higher than those in the pre-test. The comparison of the post-test and continuity test show no significant differences in the mindfulness level, flow state, depression, and training and competition satisfaction of athletes. Still, the anxiety level shows an upward trend with a significant difference. This study demonstrates that the MAIC mindfulness training program can significantly improve the mindfulness level, flow state, anxiety, depression, and training and competition satisfaction of college swimmers with a good continuity effect. Thus, the athletes' sports experience can be improved, and good psychological benefits can be attained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799103This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MAIC training could significantly improve psychological outcomes and athletic performance in dart throwing, shooting sports, and swimming athletes.

    “A series of follow-up MAIC intervention studies targeting athletes of dart throwing, shooting sports, and swimming showed that MAIC training could significantly improve their psychological outcomes (mindfulness, acceptance, flow state, anxiety reduction, training, competition satisfaction, etc.) as well as their athletic performance [16,17,18,19].”

    From The Effect of Mindfulness Intervention on the Psychological Skills and Shooting Performances in Male Collegiate Basketball Athletes in Macau: A Quasi-Experimental Study (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results and Conclusion report significant improvements in mindfulness, flow state, anxiety, depression, and training and competition satisfaction among college swimmers. The paper discusses improved sports performance but does not report a measured performance outcome; its study also does not test dart throwers or shooting athletes. Because the sentence cites several studies together, this verdict concerns the swimming study attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Danran B. Boguang Z. Chunqing Z. Jingdong L. (2020). Effect of mindfulness training on mental health of Chinese elite badminton players: a randomized controlled experimental study. Chin. J. Sports Med. 39 944– 52. 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2020.12.005 · DOI
  2. Guoyan F. Gangyan S. (2015). Effect of mindfulness training intervention on Synchronized Swimmers. Chin. J. Sports Med. 34 1159– 67. 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2015.12.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ning, J.-H., Hao, Q.-W., & Huang, D.-C.
Affiliations
Shenyang Sport University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hao, Qing-wei
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-06-24
Volume
13
Pages
799103-799103
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283386335
Cited by
14
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
mindfulness, flow experience, mental health, college swimmers, athletes, anxiety, depression, training satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review