Cited by 61Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Enriching sociocultural perspectives on the effects of idealized body norms: Integrating shame, positive body image, and self-compassion

Open access
Mills, Jennifer S., Minister, Claire, Samson, Lindsay·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Body image is an integral aspect of the psychology of the self. Idealized body images are ubiquitous in both traditional media forms (e.g., magazines, television) and social media (e.g., Facebook, Instagram). The classic sociocultural model of body image (i.e., the Tripartite Influence Model) emphasizes pathways between idealized body norms, appearance comparisons, internalization of body ideals, and body dissatisfaction and its outcomes. We summarize the model and identify some issues to be addressed in future work, particularly in light of the immense popularity of social media. We review three topics that are not included in the sociocultural model but that provide a more complete picture of the influence of societal body norms on body image: (1) body shame, (2) positive body image, and (3) self-compassion. Research on the nature, assessment, and relevance of these constructs is reviewed in detail. In terms of clinical applications of these areas of research for individuals at risk of body dissatisfaction, we suggest assessing for and targeting body shame, cultivating facets of positive body image, and teaching strategies for developing self-compassion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983534

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mixed methods approach combines the comprehensive scope of quantitative methods with the detailed insight of qualitative techniques, addressing the multifaceted nature of body image issues.

    “The mixed methods approach in body image research offers a robust framework that combines the comprehensive scope of quantitative methods with the detailed insight of qualitative techniques, effectively addressing the multifaceted nature of body image issues.”

    From Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors (2024) · cites this paper as [155]

    The Positive body image section (page not provided) says qualitative and mixed-methods studies helped expand understanding of positive body image, while quantitative studies established it as distinct from negative body image. It does not describe mixed methods as combining the comprehensive scope of quantitative methods with the detailed insight of qualitative techniques, or evaluate that combination as a robust framework for body image research generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cash T. F. Pruzinsky T. (eds.). (2002). Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Gilbert P. (2014). “Body shame: a biopsychosocial conceptualisation and overview with treatment implications,” in Body Shame, eds P. Gilbert and J. Miles (London: Routledge), 3– 54.
  3. Goss K. Gilbert P. (2014). “Eating disorders, shame and pride: a cognitive-behavioural functional analysis,” in Body Shame, eds P. Gilbert and J. Miles (London: Routledge), 219– 255.
  4. Grogan S. (2016). Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children, 3rd Edn. London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, J. S., Minister, C., & Samson, L.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Mills, Jennifer S.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-11-25
Volume
13
Pages
983534-983534
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310039571
Cited by
61
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
body image, body shame, positive body image, self-compassion, Tripartite Influence Model, appearance comparison, body dissatisfaction, social media, media influence, body image assessment, body image interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review