Cited by 13Online Learning and AnalyticsProblem and Project Based LearningOnline and Blended Learning

Key factors predicting problem-based learning in online environments: Evidence from multimodal learning analytics

Open access
Wang, Xiang, Sun, Di, Cheng, Gang, Luo, Heng·2023·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) has been used in different domains, and there is overwhelming evidence of its value. As an emerging field with excellent prospects, learning analytics (LA)—especially multimodal learning analytics (MMLA)—has increasingly attracted the attention of researchers in PBL. However, current research on the integration of LA with PBL has not related LA results with specific PBL steps or paid enough attention to the interaction in peer learning, especially for text data generated from peer interaction. This study employed MMLA based on machine learning (ML) to quantify the process engagement of peer learning, identify log behaviors, self-regulation, and other factors, and then predict online PBL performance. Participants were 104 fourth-year students in an online course on social work and problem-solving. The MMLA model contained multimodal data from online discussions, log files, reports, and questionnaires. ML classification models were built to classify text data in online discussions. The results showed that self-regulation, messages post, message words, and peer learning engagement in representation, solution, and evaluation were predictive of online PBL performance. Hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated stronger predictive validity of the process indicators on online PBL performance than other indicators. This study addressed the scarcity of students’ process data and the inefficiency of analyzing text data, as well as providing information on targeted learning strategies to scaffold students in online PBL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080294

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adoption of techniques such as machine learning, network analysis, and multimodal analytics has enriched the analytical capabilities within the field.

    “The adoption of techniques such as machine learning, network analysis, and multimodal analytics has enriched the analytical capabilities within the field (e.g., Huang et al., 2021;Wang et al., 2023).”
  • Some papers embraced both traditional and innovative approaches, including experiments, surveys, ethnography, design-oriented research, and emerging computational methods.

    “At times, papers embraced both traditional and innovative approaches, including experiments, surveys, ethnography, and design-oriented research, alongside emerging computational methods, for example, combining survey, LMS data, and multimodal data (e.g., Wang et al., 2023) or longitudinal studies combining a design intervention, a survey, test results and LMS data (e.g., Zhou et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Binkley M. Erstad O. Herman J. Raizen S. Ripley M. Miller-Ricci M.. (2012). Defining Twenty-first Century Skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
  2. Guo A. Tao Y. (2016). Research improvement of feature words weight based on TFIDF algorithm. IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2016 Chongqing, China. 415– 419.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Sun, D., Cheng, G., & Luo, H.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Open University of China (CN)
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Di
  • Luo, Heng
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-02-06
Volume
14
Pages
1080294-1080294
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319321752
Cited by
13
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Social Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (L21BSH002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
problem-based learning, online learning, multimodal learning analytics, peer learning, student self-regulation, online forums, learning outcome prediction, student engagement, social work education, learning analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review