Cited by 25Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Retrospective Outcome Monitoring of ADHD and Nutrition (ROMAN): The Effectiveness of the Few-Foods Diet in General Practice

Open access
Pelsser, Lidy, Frankena, Klaas, Toorman, Jan, Rodrigues Pereira, Rob·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Double-blind placebo-controlled studies investigating the effect of a few-foods diet (FFD) on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have provided consistent evidence that ADHD can be triggered by foods, indicating the existence of a food-induced ADHD subtype. In 2001 the "few-foods" approach was included in an ADHD treatment protocol. This approach consists of (a) determining, by means of an FFD, whether food is a trigger of ADHD; (b) reintroducing, in FFD responders, foods to assess which foods are incriminated; (c) finally composing a personalised diet eliminating the involved foods only. In the Netherlands the few-foods approach is applied in practice. We aimed to retrospectively assess its effectiveness on ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in real life. METHODS: Data from all children who started the few-foods approach in three specialised healthcare facilities during three consecutive months were included. Behavior was assessed at start and end of the 5-week FFD, using the ADHD Rating Scale and a structured psychiatric interview. Clinical responders (behavioral improvements ≥40%) proceeded with the reintroduction phase. RESULTS: Data of 57 children, 27 taking medication and 15 following some elimination diet at start, were available. No differences were noted between parental scores of children with and without medication or some elimination diet at start. 21/27 (78%) children stopped taking medication during the FFD. 34/57 (60%) children were ADHD responders, 20/29 (65%) children meeting ODD criteria were ODD responders. 26/34 (76%) ADHD responders started the reintroduction phase; 14/26 (54%) still participated at six months. Teacher data were available of 18/57 (32%) children. 9/18 (50%) children were ADHD responders. CONCLUSION: The FFD, if applied by trained specialists, may lead to clinically relevant reduction of ADHD and ODD symptoms in general practice, and a concomitant decrease of ADHD medication. These results corroborate the existence of an ADHD subgroup with food-induced ADHD. Defining and eliminating the incriminated foods, i.e. the underlying causal triggers, may result in secondary prevention of food-induced ADHD. Research into underlying mechanism(s) is of vital importance: finding an easier method or biomarkers for diagnosing food-induced ADHD and ascertaining the incriminated foods may lead to redundancy of the few-foods approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00096

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pelsser et al. report that adults who adhered to elimination diets experienced improvements in attention and impulse control, though findings require confirmation in larger, well-controlled studies.

    “Pelsser et al. [182] report that adults who adhered to elimination diets experienced improvements in attention and impulse control, though these findings require confirmation in larger, well-controlled studies.”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Results (Comparison T2 Versus T1; page unavailable) report improved ADHD scores during a few-foods diet, but the participants were 57 children, not adults. The Conclusion (Strengths and Limitations; page unavailable) notes that this was an open study rather than a randomized controlled trial; it does not specifically call for confirmation in larger, well-controlled studies. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Zinc is frequently reported at lower levels in individuals with ADHD, although the direct impact of supplementation in adults is still under investigation.

    “Zinc, a cofactor in neurotransmitter metabolism, is frequently reported at lower levels in individuals with the condition, although the direct impact of supplementation in adults is still under investigation [182].”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Introduction discusses food additives, fish oil and the few-foods diet in ADHD, while the Results concern children following that diet. Searches for zinc, lower zinc levels and zinc supplementation in adults found no passage addressing the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Magnesium has shown promise in reducing hyperactivity and inattention in children, but adult data are limited.

    “Magnesium has shown promise in reducing hyperactivity and inattention in children, but adult data are limited [182].”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Introduction discusses fish oil, food additives, and the few-foods diet, while the Discussion reports outcomes for children following the few-foods diet. Searches for magnesium supplementation and limited adult data found no passage addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pelsser, L., Frankena, K., Toorman, J., & Rodrigues Pereira, R.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Pelsser, Lidy
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-03-12
Volume
11
Pages
96-96
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011645363
Cited by
25
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
diet, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, elimination diet, food reintroduction, children, general practice, dietary triggers, secondary prevention, ADHD Rating Scale, teacher ratings, psychiatric interview, biomarkers, ADHD subtypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review