Cited by 25Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The relationship between cyberbullying victimization and cyberbullying perpetration: The role of social responsibility

Open access
Zhan, Jun, Yang, Yue, Lian, Rong·2022·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Previous studies have found some influencing factors of cyberbullying. However, little is known about how cyberbullying victimization and social responsibility influence college students' cyberbullying perpetration or about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying these relationships. Social responsibility involves not only individuals' deep cognition and special emotional identification of social responsibility but also their firm attitude and responsible actions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between college students' cyberbullying victimization and cyberbullying perpetration and whether this relationship is moderated by social responsibility. The study sample consisted of 1,016 Chinese college students (425 males) ranging in age from 19 to 25 (mean age 22). All participants completed questionnaires on cyberbullying victimization, cyberbullying perpetration and social responsibility. The results indicated that cyberbullying victimization is positively related to cyberbullying perpetration and that this relationship is mediated by social responsibility. This study highlights the harmful impact of cyberbullying victimization on college students, more notably, the underlying mechanisms between cyberbullying victimization and cyberbullying perpetration are explored, revealing that social responsibility can reduce the promoting effect of cyberbullying victimization on cyberbullying perpetration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.995937

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementing strategies that promote a shared social responsibility could be more effective in reducing perpetration.

    “Implementing strategies that instead promote a shared social responsibility could be more effective in reducing perpetration (123).”

    From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Discussion ('The mediating effect of social responsibility'; page unavailable) recommends training college students in social responsibility as a way to help reduce cyberbullying. It does not compare that strategy with alternatives or establish that it would be more effective at reducing perpetration. The Limitations section also cautions that the finding may not extend beyond the Chinese population studied. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [12]Wang SQ Chen HC. Revision of the Chinese version of college students' self-identity status questionnaire. J. Clin. Psychol. (2013) 21:196−9. 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.02.003 · DOI
  2. [19]Wei J Liu X Xue L. A study on the Current situation and Influencing Factors of College Students' social responsibility in China – based on the survey of eleven universities in eastern China. Social Sci Forum. (2015) 221– 231. 10.14185/j.cnki.issn1008-2026.2015.09.020 · DOI
  3. [26]Yao M Gao X. The relationship between exposure to violent video games and aggressive Behavior among college students: the Mediating effect of moral disengagement and the Moderating effect of disinhibition. In: The 20th National Psychology Conference - Abstracts of Psychology and National Mental Health. (2017).
  4. [36]Wang T Shen Y. Personality traits of University student cadres. Chin J Health Psychol. (2010) 103– 105. 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2010.01.047 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhan, J., Yang, Y., & Lian, R.
Affiliations
  • Fujian Normal University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lian, Rong
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2022-09-09
Volume
13
Pages
995937-995937
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295193339
Cited by
25
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education (19YJC710100)
  • Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (XJQ201931)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyber victimization, cyberbullying perpetration, social responsibility, university students, mediation, moderation, Chinese university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review