Cited by 13Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesBirth, Development, and Health

Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) circulating levels and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Leca, Bianca M., Kite, Chris, Lagojda, Lukasz, Davasgaium, Allan, Dallaway, Alex, Chatha, Kamaljit Kaur, Randeva, Harpal S., Kyrou, Ioannis·2024·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent condition where diabetes is diagnosed during pregnancy, affecting both maternal and fetal outcomes. Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) is a circulating adipokine which belongs to the lipocalin family and acts as a specific carrier protein that delivers retinol (vitamin A) from the liver to the peripheral tissues. Growing data indicate that circulating RBP4 levels may positively correlate with GDM. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the potential relationship between circulating RBP4 levels and GDM when measured at various stages of pregnancy. Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMCARE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies comparing pregnant women with and without GDM, whose circulating RBP4 levels were measured in at least one pregnancy trimester. Findings were reported using standardized mean difference (SMD) and random-effects models were used to account for variability among studies. Furthermore, the risk of bias was assessed using the RoBANS tool. Results: Out of the 34 studies identified, 32 were included in the meta-analysis (seven with circulating RBP4 levels measured in the first trimester, 19 at 24–28 weeks, and 14 at >28 weeks of pregnancy). RBP4 levels were statistically higher in the GDM group than in controls when measured during all these pregnancy stages, with the noted RBP4 SMD being 0.322 in the first trimester (95% CI: 0.126–0.517; p < 0.001; 946 GDM cases vs. 1701 non-GDM controls); 0.628 at 24–28 weeks of gestation (95% CI: 0.290–0.966; p < 0.001; 1776 GDM cases vs. 1942 controls); and 0.875 at >28 weeks of gestation (95% CI: 0.252–1.498; p = 0.006; 870 GDM cases vs. 1942 non-GDM controls). Significant study heterogeneity was noted for all three pregnancy timepoints. Conclusion: The present findings indicate consistently higher circulating RBP4 levels in GDM cases compared to non-GDM controls, suggesting the potential relevance of RBP4 as a biomarker for GDM. However, the documented substantial study heterogeneity, alongside imprecision in effect estimates, underscores the need for further research and standardization of measurement methods to elucidate whether RBP4 can be utilized in clinical practice as a potential GDM biomarker. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022340097: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022340097).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348970

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies showed higher vitamin A levels in women with GDM compared to women without GDM in the first trimester, at 24 to 28 weeks and more than 28 weeks of pregnancy.

    “A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies showed higher vitamin A levels in women with GDM compared to women without GDM in the first trimester, at 24 to 28 weeks and more than 28 weeks of pregnancy.”

    From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [129]

    The Abstract > Results reports that 32 studies were included and that circulating RBP4 levels were higher in women with GDM at all three stated pregnancy stages. The claim substitutes vitamin A levels for RBP4 levels; the paper reports the latter, not the former. No page number was provided for this passage. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2020). 32212588
  2. [34]Liengme B Hekman K. Liengme's Guide to Excel 2016 for Scientists and Engineers:(Windows and Mac). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press (2019).
  3. [58]Zhu JP Ji Y Tan M Teng Y. Variations of retinol-binding protein 4 level of patients with non-obese gestational diabetes mellitus and the influence factors. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci). (2014) 34: 1506– 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2014.10.018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leca, B. M., Kite, C., Lagojda, L., Davasgaium, A., Dallaway, A., Chatha, K. K., Randeva, H. S., & Kyrou, I.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Coventry (GB)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
  • Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Leca, Bianca M.
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-03-12
Volume
12
Pages
1348970-1348970
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392702375
Cited by
13
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
retinol-binding protein 4, gestational diabetes mellitus, adipokines, lipocalin, pregnancy, circulating biomarkers, first trimester, second trimester, third trimester
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Biomarkers, Diabetes, Gestational, Retinol-Binding Proteins, Plasma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review