Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 20 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Retraining and Nutritional Strategy of an Endurance Master Athlete Following Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Study

Open access
Louis, Julien, Tiollier, Eve, Lamb, Antonia, Bontemps, Bastien, Areta, Jose, Bernard, Thierry·2020·Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Abstract

Retraining and resuming competition following surgery is challenging for athletes due to the prolonged period of reduced physical activity and subsequent alteration in body composition and physical performance. This is even more challenging for master athletes who endure the additional effect of aging. Within this context, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits that evidence-based nutritional and training recommendations could have on the time course of reconditioning and retraining following hip arthroplasty in an endurance master triathlete. During 38 weeks (from 6 weeks prior to surgery through to the return to competition in week 32), the athlete was provided with detailed training and nutritional recommendations. Dietary intake (via the remote food photographic method), body composition (via DXA), peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), peak power output (PPO), cycling efficiency (GE) and energy availability (EA) were assessed 6 weeks pre- and 8, 12, 18, 21 and 25-weeks post-surgery. Training load was quantified (via TRIMP score and energy expenditure) daily during the retraining. Total body mass increased by 8.2 kg (attributable to a 3.5 and 4.6 kg increase in fat mass and lean mass, respectively) between week -6 and week 8 despite a reduction in carbohydrate (CHO) intake post-surgery (<3.0g/kg body mass/day). This was accompanied with a decrease in VO2peak, PPO, and GE due to a drop in training load. From week 7, the athlete resumed training and was advised to increase gradually CHO intake according to the demands of training. Eventually the athlete was able to return to competition in week 32 with a higher PPO, improved VO2peak and GE. Throughout retraining, EA was maintained around 30 kcal/kg Lean Body Mass/day, protein intake was high (~2g/kg/day) while CHO intake was periodized. Such dietary conditions allowed the athlete to maintain and even increase lean mass, which represents a major challenge with aging. Data reported in this study show, for the first time, the conditions required to recover and return to endurance competition following hip surgery.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This case study describes a 52-year-old male master triathlete who underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty and followed individualized training and nutritional recommendations from 6 weeks pre-surgery through return to competition at week 32. The intervention was associated with maintained/increased lean mass and bone mineral content, improved cycling peak power output, and eventual return to Ironman 70.3 competition, though VO2peak remained below pre-surgery.

Key findings

  • The athlete returned to competition 32 weeks after surgery; in a week-32 Ironman 70.3 he placed 1st in his age group in swimming and 3rd in cycling, but 123rd in running (82nd/155 overall, +25% of race winner time), and by week 45 another 70.3 he placed 9th/155 overall (+4% of winner time).
  • Between week −6 and week 8, total body mass increased by 8.2 kg, attributable to a 3.5 kg increase in fat mass and a 4.6 kg increase in lean mass, despite carbohydrate intake <3.0 g/kg body mass/day post-surgery; total bone mineral content increased +3.4% from week −6 to 25.
  • Energy availability was maintained around 30 kcal/kg lean body mass/day, protein intake was ~2 g/kg/day, and carbohydrate was periodized; the authors report this allowed maintenance and even increase in lean mass.
  • VO2peak (ml/min/kg) was reduced by 31.4%, 14.3%, 9.5%, 7.7%, and 13.5% at weeks 8, 12, 18, 21, and 25, respectively; absolute VO2 (L/min) showed smaller reductions. PPO recovered by week 18 (405 W) and improved by 8.6% (440 W) at week 21 and 17.3% (475 W) at week 25.

Methods

  • Single-case study of a 52-year-old male master triathlete (age 51 at surgery, body mass 83.4 kg, height 195 cm) who underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty; the intervention ran 38 weeks, from 6 weeks pre-surgery through return to competition in week 32.
  • Assessments occurred at week −6 and 8, 12, 18, 21, and 25 weeks post-surgery and included DXA for body composition and bone mineral content, submaximal and step cycling tests for VO2peak, peak power output, gross efficiency, substrate oxidation, heart rate, and blood lactate; dietary intake was recorded via the remote food photographic method for 7 consecutive days at weeks −6, 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 21, and 25; training was recorded daily with TRIMP, energy expenditure, and energy availability estimated.
  • The main analysis appears descriptive, tracking time-course changes; no formal statistical testing is stated.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: only one master athlete was studied, so additional studies are necessary to verify whether the retraining pattern is consistent in other master athletes.
  • Stated by the authors: due to logistical constraints, no body composition or physiological measurements were possible closer to training cessation, surgery time, and return to competition.
  • Evident from the text: this is a single case with no control or comparison group and no formal inferential statistics; dietary and training data depend on self-report and compliance monitoring, and findings may not generalize to other athletes, surgeries, or rehabilitation contexts.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fspor.2020.00009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Timeline of physical activity and training undertaken with (A) Frequency and (B) Duration of strength and conditioning (S&C), walking (walk), swimming (swim), cycling (cycl), and running (run) sessions from week −6 to 32.
Figure 1 Timeline of physical activity and training undertaken with (A) Frequency and (B) Duration of strength and conditioning (S&C), walking (walk), swimming (swim), cycling (cycl), and running (run) sessions from week −6 to 32.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Training (A) intensity (according to RPE) and (B) load (expressed as TRIMP) during the period of retraining from week 7–32.
Figure 2 Training (A) intensity (according to RPE) and (B) load (expressed as TRIMP) during the period of retraining from week 7–32.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Changes in total (A) body mass, (B) bone mineral content, (C) lean mass, and (D) fat mass from week −6 to 25. Changes in (E) lean mass and (F) fat mass for the injured (left) and non-injured (right) leg from week −6 to 25.
Figure 3 Changes in total (A) body mass, (B) bone mineral content, (C) lean mass, and (D) fat mass from week −6 to 25. Changes in (E) lean mass and (F) fat mass for the injured (left) and non-injured (right) leg from week −6 to 25.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 22 Not checked · 59 Own results and interpretations

51 more claims

Create a free account to see all 81 claims and to verify the 14 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 14
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Metadata

Authors
Louis, J., Tiollier, E., Lamb, A., Bontemps, B., Areta, J., & Bernard, T.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • Institut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance (FR)
  • Université de Toulon (FR)
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
Corresponding author
Louis, Julien
Venue
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
2
Pages
9-9
ISSN
2624-9367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992255322
Cited by
4
References
49
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
total hip arthroplasty, master athletes, return to competition, postoperative rehabilitation, nutritional strategies, carbohydrate intake, energy availability, protein intake, body composition, lean body mass, peak oxygen uptake, peak power, cycling efficiency, aging, training load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.