The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacteriophages and Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Biofilms are an extremely common adaptation, allowing bacteria to colonize hostile environments. They present unique problems for antibiotics and biocides, both due to the nature of the extracellular matrix and to the presence within the biofilm of metabolically inactive persister cells. Such chemicals can be highly effective against planktonic bacterial cells, while being essentially ineffective against biofilms. By contrast, bacteriophages seem to have a greater ability to target this common form of bacterial growth. The high numbers of bacteria present within biofilms actually facilitate the action of bacteriophages by allowing rapid and efficient infection of the host and consequent amplification of the bacteriophage. Bacteriophages also have a number of properties that make biofilms susceptible to their action. They are known to produce (or to be able to induce) enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix. They are also able to infect persister cells, remaining dormant within them, but re-activating when they become metabolically active. Some cultured biofilms also seem better able to support the replication of bacteriophages than comparable planktonic systems. It is perhaps unsurprising that bacteriophages, as the natural predators of bacteria, have the ability to target this common form of bacterial life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriophage lysins as effective antibacterials
Fischetti, V. A. (2008) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.012 · Cited by 477
Fauvart, M., De Groote, V. N., & Michiels, J. (2011) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.030932-0 · Cited by 425
Itoh, Y., Wang, X., Hinnebusch, B. J., Preston, J. F., & Romeo, T. (2005) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.187.1.382-387.2005 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Phage therapy: From biological mechanisms to future directions
Strathdee, S. A., Hatfull, G. F., Mutalik, V. K., & Schooley, R. T. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.017 · Cited by 817
Resistance Development to Bacteriophages Occurring during Bacteriophage Therapy
Oechslin, F. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v10070351 · Cited by 594
Gu Liu, C., Green, S. I., Min, L., Clark, J. R., Salazar, K. C., Terwilliger, A. L., Kaplan, H. B., Trautner, B. W., Ramig, R. F., & Maresso, A. W. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01462-20 · Cited by 409
Pires, D., Melo, L., Vilas Boas, D., Sillankorva, S., & Azeredo, J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.004 · Cited by 312
Biofilm formation and control strategies of foodborne pathogens: food safety perspectives
Zhao, X., Zhao, F., Wang, J., & Zhong, N. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra02497e · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Harper, D., Parracho, H., Walker, J., Sharp, R., Hughes, G., Werthén, M., Lehman, S., & Morales, S.
- Venue
- Antibiotics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-06-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 270-284
- ISSN
- 2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091813393
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteriophages and Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/antibiotics3030270
- The paper
- Harper, D., Parracho, H., Walker, J., Sharp, R., Hughes, G., Werthén, M., Lehman, S., & Morales, S. (2014). Bacteriophages and Biofilms. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.