The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Staphylococcus aureus has been an exceptionally successful pathogen, which is still relevant in modern age-medicine due to its adaptability and tenacity. This bacterium may be a causative agent in a plethora of infections, owing to its abundance (in the environment and in the normal flora) and the variety of virulence factors that it possesses. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains—first described in 1961—are characterized by an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a/c) and resistance to all penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems, which makes the β-lactam armamentarium clinically ineffective. The acquisition of additional resistance determinants further complicates their eradication; therefore, MRSA can be considered as the first representative of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Based on 230 references, the aim of this review is to recap the history, the emergence, and clinical features of various MRSA infections (hospital-, community-, and livestock-associated), and to summarize the current advances regarding MRSA screening, typing, and therapeutic options (including lipoglycopeptides, oxazolidinones, anti-MRSA cephalosporins, novel pleuromutilin-, tetracycline- and quinolone-derivatives, daptomycin, fusidic acid, in addition to drug candidates in the development phase), both for an audience of clinical microbiologists and infectious disease specialists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
Ganz, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1180 · Cited by 3,066
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
What is antimicrobial stewardship?
Dyar, O. J., Huttner, B., Schouten, J., & Pulcini, C. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026 · Cited by 870
The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies
Cegelski, L., Marshall, G. R., Eldridge, G. R., & Hultgren, S. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1818 · Cited by 788
Stefani, S., Chung, D. R., Lindsay, J. A., Friedrich, A. W., Kearns, A. M., Westh, H., & MacKenzie, F. M. (2012) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030 · Cited by 590
Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Gardete, S., & Tomasz, A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci68834 · Cited by 565
Eady, E. A., & Cove, J. H. (2003) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/00001432-200304000-00007 · Cited by 329
Moellering, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkr437 · Cited by 236
Garcia, L. G., Lemaire, S., Kahl, B. C., Becker, K., Proctor, R. A., Denis, O., Tulkens, P. M., & Van Bambeke, F. (2013) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkt072 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance: The challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace
Chinemerem Nwobodo, D., Ugwu, M. C., Oliseloke Anie, C., Al‐Ouqaili, M. T. S., Chinedu Ikem, J., Victor Chigozie, U., & Saki, M. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis · doi:10.1002/jcla.24655 · Cited by 985
Metadata
- Authors
- Gajdács, M.
- Venue
- Antibiotics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 52
- ISSN
- 2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943209288
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 28.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/antibiotics8020052
- The paper
- Gajdács, M. (2019). The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.