Cited by 37Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Circular Economy in Mexico’s Electronic and Cell Phone Industry: Recent Evidence of Consumer Behavior

Open access
Cordova-Pizarro, Daniela, Aguilar-Barajas, Ismael, Rodriguez, Ciro A., Romero, David·2020·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) models are increasingly referenced in international fora and on many countries’ climate action agendas. This emphasis is associated with the international environmental and climate crisis. The case of the electronics industry remains particularly relevant, given its background in the use of CE models and its potential to enhance their use. This work focuses on consumer behavior regarding electronics products in Mexico. This is a largely under-researched topic not only in Mexico but also in Latin America. This study demonstrates that, by trying to extend the lifespan of their electronic products, consumers have awareness of product circularity. However, there is a lack of incentives to capitalize on this consumer interest, compounded by the limited participation of manufacturers and distributors. It is concluded that with a well-designed public policy, the electronics industry (including the mobile phone sector) in Mexico can move toward a CE model more rapidly. A stronger initiative for CE by design should be part of these policies, not only in Mexico but also internationally. The role of better eco-labelling in promoting consumers’ environmental awareness is essential. The lessons of this case study might be of interest to other countries as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app10217744

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reverse logistics systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, encourage widespread consumer participation, facilitate multistakeholder collaboration, and enable the return of value to the original equipment manufacturer, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.

    “Such systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, not only encourage widespread consumer participation (Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020;Ylä-Mella et al. 2022) but also facilitate multistakeholder collaboration and enable the return of value to the OEM, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular Economy-From Review of Theories and Practices to Development of Implementation Tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 190-201. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Moraga, G.; Huysveld, S.; Mathieux, F.; Blengini, G.A.; Alaerts, L.; Van Acker, K.; Dewulf, J. Circular Economy Indicators: What do they Measure? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 452-461. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Yu, J.; Williams, E.; Meiting, J. Analysis of Material and Energy Consumption of Mobile Phones in China. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4135-4141. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Kumar, A.; Holuszko, M.; Romano Espinosa, D.C. E-Waste: An Overview on Generation, Collection, Legislation and Recycling Practices. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 122, 32-42. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Cucchiella, F.; D'Adamo, I.; Lenny Koh, S.C.; Rosa, P. Recycling of WEEEs: An Economic Assessment of Present and Future e-Waste Streams. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 263-272. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Cruz, S.; Ojeda, S.; Jáuregui, J.; Velázquez, K.; Santillán, N.; García, R.; Alcántara, V.; Alcántara, C. E-Waste Supply Chain in Mexico: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Management. Sustainability 2017, 9, 503. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Córdova-Pizarro, D.; Aguilar-Barajas, I.; Romero, D.; Rodriguez, C. Circular Economy in the Electronic Products Sector: Material Flow Analysis and Economic Impact of Cellphone E-waste in Mexico. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1361. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). Circular Economy Vision 2020 Compiled. Available online: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2020/0522_003.html (accessed on 16 October 2020).
  9. Alcántara-Concepción, V.; Gavilán-García, A.; Gavilán-García, I. Environmental Impacts at the End of Life of Computers and their Management Alternatives in Mexico. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 615-628. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Xavier, L.; Giese, E.; Ribeiro, A.; Freitas, F. Sustainability and the Circular Economy: A Theoretical Approach focused on e-Waste Urban Mining. Resour. Policy 2019, 22, 101467. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Ottoni, M.; Dias, P.; Xavier, L.H. A Circular Approach to the e-Waste Valorization through Urban Mining in Rio de Janeiro. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 120990. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Mohammadi, E.; Singh, S.J.; Habib, K. Electronic Waste in the Caribbean: An Impending Environmental Disaster or an Opportunity for a Circular Economy? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 164, 105106. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Saphores, J.-D.M.; Ogunseitan, O.A.; Shapiro, A.A. Willingness to Engage in a Pro-environmental Behavior: An Analysis of e-Waste Recycling based on a National Survey of U.S. Households. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 60, 49-63. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jafari, A.; Heydari, J.; Keramati, A. Factors Affecting Incentive Dependency of Residents to Participate in e-Waste Recycling: A Case Study on Adoption of e-Waste Reverse Supply Chain in Iran. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2015, 19, 325-338. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Xu, L.; Ling, M.; Wu, Y. Economic Incentive and Social Influence to Overcome Household Waste Separation Dilemma: A Field Intervention Study. Waste Manag. 2018, 77, 522-531. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Peng, B.; Tu, Y.; Wei, G. Governance of Electronic Waste Recycling based on Social Capital Embeddedness Theory. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 29-36. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Aprile, M.C.; Fiorillo, D. Intrinsic Incentives in Household Waste Recycling: The Case of Italy in the Year 1998. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 98-110. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Homrich, A.; Galvao, G.; Abadia, L.; Carvalho, M. The Circular Economy Umbrella: Trends and Gaps on Integrating Pathways. Clean. Prod. 2017, 175, 525-543. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Urbinati, A.; Chiaroni, D.; Chiesa, V. Towards a New Taxonomy of Circular Economy Business Models. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 487-498. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37-46. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221-232. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  22. Yudi, F.; Chein, N. An Empirical Analysis of Eco-design of Electronic Products on Operational Performance: Does Environmental Performance Play Role as a Mediator? Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2017, 14, 188-205. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Andrae, A.S.G.; Xia, M.; Zhang, J.; Tang, X. Practical Eco-design and Eco-innovation of Consumer Electronics-The Case of Mobile Phones. Challenges 2016, 7, 3. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Jianfang, Z.; Jianwei, T.; Dongfeng, G.; Liang, C. A Study on the Eco-design of Consumer Electronics. In Proceedings of the China National Institute of Standardization, 3rd International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2018), Guilin, China, 10-12 August 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Parajuly, K.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Muldoon, O.; Kuehr, R. Behavioral Change for the Circular Economy: A Review with focus on Electronic Waste Management in the EU. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 6, 100035. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Jinhui, L.; Xianlai, Z.; Stevels, A. Ecodesign in Consumer Electronics: Past, Present, and Future. J. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. 2014, 45, 840-860. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Bocken, N.M.; De Pauw, I.; Bakker, C.; Van Der Grinten, B. Product Design and Business Model Strategies for a Circular Economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016, 33, 308-320. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  28. Zelezny, L.; Chua, P.P.; Aldrich, C. Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56, 443-457. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Jui-Che, T.; Xiu-Yue, Z.; Sin-Yi, H. Key Factors of Sustainability for Smartphones Based on Taiwanese Consumers' Perceived Values. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4446. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Knot, M.; Luiten, H. User Involvement in the Development of Sustainable Product-Service Systems. In User Behavior and Technology Development; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 263-276. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Nascimento, D.L.M.; Alencastro, V.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Caiado, R.G.G.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Rocha-Lona, L.; Tortorella, G. Exploring Industry 4.0 Technologies to enable Circular Economy Practices in a Manufacturing Context: A Business Model Proposal. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 607-627. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Jiménez-Parra, B.; Rubio, S.; Vicente-Molina, M. Key Drivers in the Behavior of Potential Consumers of Remanufactured Products: A Study on Laptops in Spain. Clean. Prod. 2014, 85, 488-496. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Schäfer, M.; Jaeger-Erben, M.; Dos Santos, A. Leapfrogging to Sustainable Consumption? An Explorative Survey of Consumption Habits and Orientations in Southern Brazil. J. Consum. Policy 2011, 34, 175-196. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Yoshida, A.; Terazono, A.; Ballesteros, F.C.; Nguyen, D.-Q.; Sukandar, S.; Kojima, M.; Sakata, S. E-Waste Recycling Processes in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam: A Case Study of Cathode Ray Tube TVs and Monitors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 106, 48-58. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Badiru, F.; Begianpuye, D.; Giwa, A.; Argungu, S.; Amen, C. Material Flow Analysis of Electronic Wastes (e-Wastes) in Lagos, Nigeria. J. Environ. Prot. 2013, 4, 1011-1017. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Barlett, I.; Larborn, J.; Mani, M.; Johannson, B. Decision Making for Sustainable Electronic Waste Management Systems: Automatic Sorting Technology. Sustainability 2016, 8, 84. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Louviere, J.J.; Flynn, T.N.; Carson, R.T. Discrete Choice Experiments are not Conjoint Analysis. J. Choice Model. 2010, 3, 57-72. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  38. Andersen, M.S. An Introductory Note on the Environmental Economics of the Circular Economy. Sustain. Sci. 2007, 2, 133-140. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hennies, L.; Stamminger, R. An Empirical Survey on the Obsolescence of Appliances in German Households. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 112, 73-82. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Amankwah-Amoah, J. Integrated vs. Add-on: A Multidimensional Conceptualisation of Technology Obsolescence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 116, 299-307. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Nixon, H.; Saphores, J.-D.M.; Ogunseitan, O.A.; Shapiro, A.A. Understanding Preferences for Recycling Electronic Waste in California: The Influence of Environmental Attitudes and Beliefs on Willingness to Pay. Environ. Behav. 2009, 41, 101-124. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ylä-Mella, J.; Keiski, R.L.; Pongrácz, E. Electronic Waste Recovery in Finland: Consumers' Perceptions towards Recycling and Re-use of Mobile Phones. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 374-384. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Papaoikonomou, K.; Latinopoulos, D.; Emmanouil, C.; Kungolos, A. A Survey on Factors Influencing Recycling Behavior for Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Municipality of Volos, Greece. Environ. Process. 2020, 7, 321-339. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  44. Wagner, T.P. Examining the Concept of Convenient Collection: An Application to Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Stewardship Frameworks. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 499-507. [CrossRef] · DOI

Authors
Cordova-Pizarro, D., Aguilar-Barajas, I., Rodriguez, C. A., & Romero, D.
Affiliations
Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Corresponding author
Aguilar-Barajas, Ismael
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
10
Issue
21
Pages
7744
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097390377
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
circular economy, electronics industry, mobile devices, consumer behavior, product life extension, environmental labelling, environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review