Cited by 35Optimal Power Flow DistributionPower Quality and HarmonicsMicrogrid Control and Optimization

Single-Phase PV Power Injection Limit due to Voltage Unbalances Applied to an Urban Reference Network Using Real-Time Simulation

Open access
Lucas, Alexandre·2018·Applied Sciences

Abstract

As photovoltaic (PV) penetration increases in low-voltage distribution networks, voltage variation may become a problem. This is particularly important in residential single-phase systems, due to voltage unbalances created by the inflow of points in the network. The existing literature frequently refers to three-phase systems focusing on losses and voltage variations. Many studies tend to use case studies whose conclusions are difficult to replicate and generalise. As levels of residential PV rise, single-phase PV power injection levels, before voltage unbalances reach standard limits, become important to be investigated. In this study, an urban European reference network is considered, and using a real-time digital simulator, different levels of PV penetration are simulated. PV systems are connected to the same phase (unbalanced case), and are also evenly phase-distributed (balanced case). Considering a 2–3% unbalance limit, approximately 3.5–4.6 kW could be injected in every bus in an unbalanced scenario. With a balanced PV distribution, the power injected could reach 10–13 kW per bus. Buses closer to the power transformer allow higher power connections, due to cable distances and inferior voltage drops. Feeder length, loads considered during simulation, and cable shunt capacitance reactance influence the results the most.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app8081333

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of PVs on VUF in the LV urban distribution reference network does not present a problem, since VUF does not exceed the 2-3% boundaries.

    “The impact of PVs on the VUF in the LV urban distribution reference network does not present the problem, since the VUF does not exceed the 2-3% boundaries [30].”

    From A Comprehensive Analysis of the Voltage Unbalance Factor in PV and EV Rich Non-Synthetic Low Voltage Distribution Networks (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    In Results and Discussion (page unavailable), the paper reports that voltage-unbalance limits of 2% and 3% are reached at PV injections of 3.5 kW and 4.6 kW, respectively, and adopts the conservative 2% limit for further analysis. It therefore treats PV-induced unbalance as a constraint, contrary to the unqualified claim that it presents no problem. Section 2.2 also says the study uses a magnitude-based measure rather than VUF. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hoke, A.; Butler, R.; Hambrick, J.; Kroposki, B. Maximum Photovoltaic Penetration Levels on Typical Distribution Feeders. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 4, 350-357.
  2. Cooper, H.; Markiewicz, D.A.; Wroclaw, A. Voltage Disturbances. Power Qual. Appl. Guid. 2004, 5, 4-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas, A.
Affiliations
Joint Research Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Lucas, Alexandre
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
1333
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886331164
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
Keywords
single-phase photovoltaic systems, voltage unbalance, low-voltage distribution networks, real-time digital simulation, feeder length, voltage drop

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review