CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 206Cell Adhesion Molecules ResearchCellular Mechanics and InteractionsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FAK Structure and Regulation by Membrane Interactions and Force in Focal Adhesions

Open access
Tapial Martínez, Paula, López Navajas, Pilar, Lietha, Daniel·2020·Biomolecules
DOI 10.3390/biom10020179PMC PMC7072507
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase with key roles in the regulation of cell adhesion migration, proliferation and survival. In cancer FAK is a major driver of invasion and metastasis and its upregulation is associated with poor patient prognosis. FAK is autoinhibited in the cytosol, but activated upon localisation into a protein complex, known as focal adhesion complex. This complex forms upon cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) at the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane at sites of ECM attachment. FAK is anchored to the complex via multiple sites, including direct interactions with specific membrane lipids and connector proteins that attach focal adhesions to the actin cytoskeleton. In migrating cells, the contraction of actomyosin stress fibres attached to the focal adhesion complex apply a force to the complex, which is likely transmitted to the FAK protein, causing stretching of the FAK molecule. In this review we discuss the current knowledge of the FAK structure and how specific structural features are involved in the regulation of FAK signalling. We focus on two major regulatory mechanisms known to contribute to FAK activation, namely interactions with membrane lipids and stretching forces applied to FAK, and discuss how they might induce structural changes that facilitate FAK activation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biom10020179

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Structures of FAK domains. (a) Schematic domain structure of FAK. Domain boundaries and regulatory phosphorylation sites are indicated. (b) Crystal structure of the FAK FERM domain containing the F1, F1 and F3 lobes (PDB accession 2AL6). The 10 C-terminal residues integral to the FAK FERM domain, but not in ERM FERM domains, are coloured in orange. The linker is in yellow with the PxxP motif known to interact with the Src SH3 domain in red. The Y397 autophosphorylation site in the linker and the KAKTLRK motif in the F2 lobe (blue) are labelled. (c) Structure of the active FAK kinase domain with Y576 and Y577 in the activation loop (A-loop) phosphorylated (PDB accession 2J0L). The A-loop is coloured in green. A non-hydrolysable ATP analogue (AMP-PNP) and a Mg2+ ion (yellow sphere) are bound to the active site. (d) Structure of the FAT domain bound to the paxillin LD4 peptide (PDB accession 1OW7). The paxillin LD4 peptide is in olive green and the N-terminal FAT extension in tan. Helices H1-H4 and the S910 and Y925 phosphorylation sites are labelled. (e) Crystal structure of the FERM-kinase region of FAK in the autoinhibited conformation (PDB accession 2J0J). Colouring is as in panels (a,b). (f) FERM dimer mediated by W266 interactions in the F3 lobe as observed in various crystal structures (shown from PDB accession 2AEH).
Figure 1 Structures of FAK domains. (a) Schematic domain structure of FAK. Domain boundaries and regulatory phosphorylation sites are indicated. (b) Crystal structure of the FAK FERM domain containing the F1, F1 and F3 lobes (PDB accession 2AL6). The 10 C-terminal residues integral to the FAK FERM domain, but not in ERM FERM domains, are coloured in orange. The linker is in yellow with the PxxP motif known to interact with the Src SH3 domain in red. The Y397 autophosphorylation site in the linker and the KAKTLRK motif in the F2 lobe (blue) are labelled. (c) Structure of the active FAK kinase domain with Y576 and Y577 in the activation loop (A-loop) phosphorylated (PDB accession 2J0L). The A-loop is coloured in green. A non-hydrolysable ATP analogue (AMP-PNP) and a Mg2+ ion (yellow sphere) are bound to the active site. (d) Structure of the FAT domain bound to the paxillin LD4 peptide (PDB accession 1OW7). The paxillin LD4 peptide is in olive green and the N-terminal FAT extension in tan. Helices H1-H4 and the S910 and Y925 phosphorylation sites are labelled. (e) Crystal structure of the FERM-kinase region of FAK in the autoinhibited conformation (PDB accession 2J0J). Colouring is as in panels (a,b). (f) FERM dimer mediated by W266 interactions in the F3 lobe as observed in various crystal structures (shown from PDB accession 2AEH).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Model for FAK activation in focal adhesions mediated by membrane interactions and force. Left: FAK can form dimers via F3 lobe interactions involving W266. FAK dimer formation is likely promoted upon recruitment into focal adhesions by increased local concentration and potentially by paxillin-FAT interactions that synergise with FAT-FERM interactions to stabilise FAK dimers. Middle: FAK interacts with nearby PIP2 rich membranes via the KAKTLRK basic patch in the FERM F2 lobe. Increased avidity for PIP2 of FAK dimers might enhance membrane attachment. Membrane interactions induce conformational changes that allow simultaneous interactions of FERM and kinase domains to the membrane and expose the FERM-kinase linker for efficient autophosphorylation on Y397. Right: Src binds with its SH2 domain to the phosphorylated Y397 site and with the SH3 domain to the PxxP motif in the FERM-kinase linker. Stretching forces applied to FAK by contracting actomyosin fibres cause release of the FAK kinase domain from FERM and membrane interactions, exposing the activation loop for efficient phosphorylation by Src, resulting in FAK activation.
Figure 2 Model for FAK activation in focal adhesions mediated by membrane interactions and force. Left: FAK can form dimers via F3 lobe interactions involving W266. FAK dimer formation is likely promoted upon recruitment into focal adhesions by increased local concentration and potentially by paxillin-FAT interactions that synergise with FAT-FERM interactions to stabilise FAK dimers. Middle: FAK interacts with nearby PIP2 rich membranes via the KAKTLRK basic patch in the FERM F2 lobe. Increased avidity for PIP2 of FAK dimers might enhance membrane attachment. Membrane interactions induce conformational changes that allow simultaneous interactions of FERM and kinase domains to the membrane and expose the FERM-kinase linker for efficient autophosphorylation on Y397. Right: Src binds with its SH2 domain to the phosphorylated Y397 site and with the SH3 domain to the PxxP motif in the FERM-kinase linker. Stretching forces applied to FAK by contracting actomyosin fibres cause release of the FAK kinase domain from FERM and membrane interactions, exposing the activation loop for efficient phosphorylation by Src, resulting in FAK activation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 206

Related

Metadata

Authors
Tapial Martínez, P., López Navajas, P., & Lietha, D.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Cell Signalling and Adhesion Group, 28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Lietha, Daniel
ORCID
Lietha, Daniel
Venue
Biomolecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-01-24
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
179
ISSN
2218-273X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/biom10020179
PMC
PMC7072507
OpenAlex
W3002011373
Semantic Scholar
3830912f29816d1795a68aeaa4e040c80c112f67
Cited by
206
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Biomolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RTI2018-099318-B-I00, RTI2018)
  • Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España (BFU2016-77665-R)
  • European Regional Development Fund (BFU2016, RTI2018, BFU2016-77665-R)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
focal adhesion kinase, focal adhesions, membrane lipid interactions, mechanical forces, FAK activation, non-receptor tyrosine kinase, cell adhesion, extracellular matrix, metastasis, actin cytoskeleton
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Cell Movement, Humans, Membranes, Actin Cytoskeleton, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, Focal Adhesions, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Focal Adhesion Kinase 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review