Cited by 35Hedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Repurposing Niclosamide for Targeting Pancreatic Cancer by Inhibiting Hh/Gli Non-Canonical Axis of Gsk3β

Open access
Kaushal, Jyoti, Bhatia, Rakesh, Kanchan, Ranjana, Raut, Pratima, Mallapragada, Surya, Ly, Quan, Batra, Surinder, Rachagani, Satyanarayana·2021·Cancers

Abstract

Niclosamide (Nic), an FDA-approved anthelmintic drug, is reported to have anti-cancer efficacy and is being assessed in clinical trials for various solid tumors. Based on its ability to target multiple signaling pathways, in the present study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of Nic on pancreatic cancer (PC) in vitro. We observed an anti-cancerous effect of this drug as shown by the G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest, inhibition of PC cell viability, colony formation, and migration. Our results revealed the involvement of mitochondrial stress and mTORC1-dependent autophagy as the predominant players of Nic-induced PC cell death. Significant reduction of Nic-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell death in the presence of a selective autophagy inhibitor spautin-1 demonstrated autophagy as a major contributor to Nic-mediated cell death. Mechanistically, Nic inhibited the interaction between BCL2 and Beclin-1 that supported the crosstalk of autophagy and apoptosis. Further, Nic treatment resulted in Gsk3β inactivation by phosphorylating its Ser-9 residue leading to upregulation of Sufu and Gli3, thereby negatively impacting hedgehog signaling and cell survival. Nic induced autophagic cell death, and p-Gsk3b mediated Sufu/Gli3 cascade was further confirmed by Gsk3β activator, LY-294002, by rescuing inactivation of Hh signaling upon Nic treatment. These results suggested the involvement of a non-canonical mechanism of Hh signaling, where p-Gsk3β acts as a negative regulator of Hh/Gli1 cascade and a positive regulator of autophagy-mediated cell death. Overall, this study established the therapeutic efficacy of Nic for PC by targeting p-Gsk3β mediated non-canonical Hh signaling and promoting mTORC1-dependent autophagy and cell death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers13133105

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another antihelminthic drug, niclosamide, inhibited PARP cleavage in the presence of a late inhibitor of autophagy, Bafilomycin A1, in PDAC cells.

    “another antihelminthic drug niclosamide inhibited PARP cleavage in the presence of a late inhibitor of autophagy, Bafilomycin A1, in PDAC cells [48]”

    From Pyrvinium Pamoate Alone and With Gemcitabine Exhibits Anti‐Pancreatic Cancer Activity in <scp>2D</scp> and <scp>3D</scp> Cell Culture Models (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

    Results §3.2 reports increased cleaved PARP after niclosamide treatment in pancreatic cancer cells, not inhibition. Results §3.4 reports that the autophagy inhibitor spautin-1 attenuated niclosamide-induced apoptosis, but our copy does not report PARP cleavage in the presence of Bafilomycin A1. The specified drug combination and PARP outcome are therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. [1]Mizrahi J.D. Surana R. Valle J.W. Shroff R.T. Pancreatic cancer Lancet 2020 395 2008 2020 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0 32593337 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Rahib L. Smith B.D. Aizenberg R. Rosenzweig A.B. Fleshman J.M. Matrisian L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States Cancer Res. 2014 74 2913 2921 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155 24840647 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Chu L.C. Goggins M.G. Fishman E.K. Diagnosis and detection of pancreatic cancer Cancer J. 2017 23 333 342 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000290 29189329 · DOI
  4. [6]Zhang L. Sanagapalli S. Stoita A. Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer World J. Gastroenterol. 2018 24 2047 10.3748/wjg.v24.i19.2047 29785074 PMC5960811 · DOI
  5. [7]Roth M.T. Cardin D.B. Berlin J.D. Recent advances in the treatment of pancreatic cancer F1000Research 2020 9 131 10.12688/f1000research.21981.1 32148767 PMC7043109 · DOI
  6. [8]Ducreux M. Seufferlein T. Van Laethem J.-L. Laurent-Puig P. Smolenschi C. Malka D. Boige V. Hollebecque A. Conroy T. Systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer revisited Semin. Oncol. 2019 46 28 38 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.12.003 30638624 · DOI
  7. [9]Zhang Z. Zhou L. Xie N. Nice E.C. Zhang T. Cui Y. Huang C. Overcoming cancer therapeutic bottleneck by drug repurposing Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020 5 113 10.1038/s41392-020-00213-8 32616710 PMC7331117 · DOI
  8. [12]Pearson R.D. Hewlett E.L. Niclosamide therapy for tapeworm infections Ann. Intern. Med. 1985 102 550 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-550 3977200 · DOI
  9. [13]Al-Hadiya B.M. Niclosamide: Comprehensive profile Profiles Drug Subst. Excip. Relat. Methodol. 2005 32 67 96 22469082
  10. [14]Frayha G.J. Smyth J. Gobert J.G. Savel J. The mechanisms of action of antiprotozoal and anthelmintic drugs in man Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 1997 28 273 299 10.1016/S0306-3623(96)00149-8 9013207 · DOI
  11. [15]Chen W. Mook R.A. Jr. Premont R.T. Wang J. Niclosamide: Beyond an antihelminthic drug Cell Signal. 2018 41 89 96 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.04.001 28389414 PMC5628105 · DOI
  12. [16]Satoh K. Zhang L. Zhang Y. Chelluri R. Boufraqech M. Nilubol N. Patel D. Shen M. Kebebew E. Identification of niclosamide as a novel anticancer agent for adrenocortical carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2016 22 3458 3466 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2256 26873959 PMC4947455 · DOI
  13. [17]Arend R.C. Londoño-Joshi A.I. Samant R.S. Li Y. Conner M. Hidalgo B. Alvarez R.D. Landen C.N. Straughn J.M. Buchsbaum D.J. Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin pathway by niclosamide: A therapeutic target for ovarian cancer Gynecol. Oncol. 2014 134 112 120 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.005 24736023 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [18]Wieland A. Trageser D. Gogolok S. Reinartz R. Höfer H. Keller M. Leinhaas A. Schelle R. Normann S. Klaas L. Anticancer effects of niclosamide in human glioblastoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2013 19 4124 4136 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2895 23908450 · DOI
  15. [19]Wang J. Ren X.-R. Piao H. Zhao S. Osada T. Premont R.T. Mook R.A. Morse M.A. Lyerly H.K. Chen W. Niclosamide-induced Wnt signaling inhibition in colorectal cancer is mediated by autophagy Biochem. J. 2019 476 535 546 10.1042/BCJ20180385 30635359 PMC6643999 · DOI
  16. [20]Londoño-Joshi A.I. Arend R.C. Aristizabal L. Lu W. Samant R.S. Metge B.J. Hidalgo B. Grizzle W.E. Conner M. Forero-Torres A. Effect of niclosamide on basal-like breast cancers Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014 13 800 811 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0555 24552774 PMC3981919 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [21]Kleszcz R. Paluszczak J. Baer-Dubowska W. The effect of niclosamide on the head and neck carcinoma cells survival and the expression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and glycolysis pathway components Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res 2019 76 661 669 10.32383/appdr/105605 · DOI
  18. [22]Zhao J. He Q. Gong Z. Chen S. Cui L. Niclosamide suppresses renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin and inducing mitochondrial dysfunctions SpringerPlus 2016 5 1436 10.1186/s40064-016-3153-x 27652012 PMC5005241 · DOI
  19. [23]Wang C. Zhou X. Xu H. Shi X. Zhao J. Yang M. Zhang L. Jin X. Hu Y. Li X. Niclosamide inhibits cell growth and enhances drug sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via STAT3 signaling pathway J. Cancer 2018 9 4150 10.7150/jca.26948 30519314 PMC6277621 · DOI
  20. [24]Shi L. Zheng H. Hu W. Zhou B. Dai X. Zhang Y. Liu Z. Wu X. Zhao C. Liang G. Niclosamide inhibition of STAT3 synergizes with erlotinib in human colon cancer OncoTargets Ther. 2017 10 1767 10.2147/OTT.S129449 28367059 PMC5370071 · DOI
  21. [25]Chen L. Wang L. Shen H. Lin H. Li D. Anthelminthic drug niclosamide sensitizes the responsiveness of cervical cancer cells to paclitaxel via oxidative stress-mediated mTOR inhibition Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017 484 416 421 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.01.140 28137584 · DOI
  22. [26]Suliman M.A. Zhang Z. Na H. Ribeiro A.L. Zhang Y. Niang B. Hamid A.S. Zhang H. Xu L. Zuo Y. Niclosamide inhibits colon cancer progression through downregulation of the Notch pathway and upregulation of the tumor suppressor miR-200 family Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016 38 776 784 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2689 27460529 PMC4990307 · DOI
  23. [27]Jin Y. Lu Z. Ding K. Li J. Du X. Chen C. Sun X. Wu Y. Zhou J. Pan J. Antineoplastic mechanisms of niclosamide in acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells: Inactivation of the NF-κB pathway and generation of reactive oxygen species Cancer Res. 2010 70 2516 2527 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3950 20215516 · DOI
  24. [28]Fujii A. Masuda T. Iwata M. Tobo T. Wakiyama H. Koike K. Kosai K. Nakano T. Kuramitsu S. Kitagawa A. The novel driver gene ASAP2 is a potential druggable target in pancreatic cancer Cancer Sci. 2021 112 1655 10.1111/cas.14858 33605496 PMC8019229 · DOI
  25. [29]McCubrey J.A. Rakus D. Gizak A. Steelman L.S. Abrams S.L. Lertpiriyapong K. Fitzgerald T.L. Yang L.V. Montalto G. Cervello M. Effects of mutations in Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog, Notch and PI3K pathways on GSK-3 activity—Diverse effects on cell growth, metabolism and cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2016 1863 2942 2976 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.004 27612668 · DOI
  26. [30]Awaji M. Saxena S. Wu L. Prajapati D.R. Purohit A. Varney M.L. Kumar S. Rachagani S. Ly Q.P. Jain M. CXCR2 signaling promotes secretory cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma FASEB J. 2020 34 9405 9418 10.1096/fj.201902990R 32453916 PMC7501205 · DOI
  27. [31]Kyriazis A.P. McCombs W.B. Sandberg A.A. Kyriazis A.A. Sloane N.H. Lepera R. Establishment and characterization of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line SW-1990 in tissue culture and the nude mouse Cancer Res. 1983 43 4393 4401 6871872
  28. [32]Zhang S.-N. Huang F.-T. Huang Y.-J. Zhong W. Yu Z. Characterization of a cancer stem cell-like side population derived from human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells Tumori J. 2010 96 985 992 10.1177/548.6520 21388063 · DOI
  29. [33]Morgan R. Woods L. Moore G. Quinn L. McGavran L. Gordon S. Human cell line (COLO357) of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Int. J. Cancer 1980 25 591 598 10.1002/ijc.2910250507 6989766 · DOI
  30. [34]Sipos B. Möser S. Kalthoff H. Török V. Löhr M. Klöppel G. A comprehensive characterization of pancreatic ductal carcinoma cell lines: Towards the establishment of an in vitro research platform Virchows Arch. 2003 442 444 452 10.1007/s00428-003-0784-4 12692724 · DOI
  31. [35]Zinn R. Otterbein H. Lehnert H. Ungefroren H. RAC1B: A guardian of the epithelial phenotype and protector against epithelial-mesenchymal transition Cells 2019 8 1569 10.3390/cells8121569 31817229 PMC6952788 · DOI
  32. [36]Kaushal J.B. Popli P. Sankhwar P. Shukla V. Dwivedi A. Sonic hedgehog protects endometrial hyperplasial cells against oxidative stress via suppressing mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-like GTPase (Drp1) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018 129 582 599 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.427 30347228 · DOI
  33. [37]Munafó D.B. Colombo M.I. A novel assay to study autophagy: Regulation of autophagosome vacuole size by amino acid deprivation J. Cell Sci. 2001 114 3619 3629 10.1242/jcs.114.20.3619 11707514 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [39]Ahn S.Y. Yang J.H. Kim N.H. Lee K. Cha Y.H. Yun J.S. Kang H.E. Lee Y. Choi J. Kim H.S. Anti-helminthic niclosamide inhibits Ras-driven oncogenic transformation via activation of GSK-3 Oncotarget 2017 8 31856 10.18632/oncotarget.16255 28418865 PMC5458253 · DOI
  35. [40]Jiang L. Hu B. Guo Q. Chen L. Treatment of pancreatic cancer in a nude mouse model using high-intensity focused ultrasound Exp. Ther. Med. 2012 5 39 44 10.3892/etm.2012.744 23251239 PMC3524259 · DOI
  36. [41]Meitner P.A. Kajiji S.M. LaPosta-Frazier N. Bogaars H.A. Jolly G.A. Dexter D.L. Calabresi P. Tumer M.D. “COLO357”, a human pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: Growth in artificial capillary culture and in nude mice Cancer Res. 1983 43 5978 5985 6640542
  37. [42]Tzanakakis G.N. Margioris A.N. Tsatsakis A.M. Vezeridis M.P. The metastatic potential of human pancreatic cell lines in the liver of nude mice correlates well with cathepsin B activity Int. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2003 34 27 38 10.1385/IJGC:34:1:27 15235133 · DOI
  38. [43]Wu C.-C. Bratton S.B. Regulation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway by reactive oxygen species Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013 19 546 558 10.1089/ars.2012.4905 22978471 PMC3717204 · DOI
  39. [45]Roca-Agujetas V. de Dios C. Lestón L. Marí M. Morales A. Colell A. Recent insights into the mitochondrial role in autophagy and its regulation by oxidative stress Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019 2019 3809308 10.1155/2019/3809308 PMC6875203 31781334 · DOI
  40. [46]Azad M.B. Chen Y. Gibson S.B. Regulation of autophagy by reactive oxygen species (ROS): Implications for cancer progression and treatment Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009 11 777 790 10.1089/ars.2008.2270 18828708 · DOI
  41. [47]Newton P.T. New insights into niclosamide action: Autophagy activation in colorectal cancer Biochem. J. 2019 476 779 781 10.1042/BCJ20190020 30842311 · DOI
  42. [48]Chai W.-H. Li Y.-R. Lin S.-H. Chao Y.-H. Chen C.-H. Chan P.-C. Lin C.-H. Antihelminthic niclosamide induces autophagy and delayed apoptosis in human non-small lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo Anticancer Res. 2020 40 1405 1417 10.21873/anticanres.14082 32132037 · DOI
  43. [49]Funderburk S.F. Wang Q.J. Yue Z. The Beclin 1–VPS34 complex–at the crossroads of autophagy and beyond Trends Cell Biol. 2010 20 355 362 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.002 20356743 PMC3781210 · DOI
  44. [50]Eskelinen E.-L. Illert A.L. Tanaka Y. Schwarzmann G.n. Blanz J. Von Figura K. Saftig P. Role of LAMP-2 in lysosome biogenesis and autophagy Mol. Biol. Cell 2002 13 3355 3368 10.1091/mbc.e02-02-0114 12221139 PMC124165 · DOI
  45. [51]Demishtein A. Fraiberg M. Berko D. Tirosh B. Elazar Z. Navon A. SQSTM1/p62-mediated autophagy compensates for loss of proteasome polyubiquitin recruiting capacity Autophagy 2017 13 1697 1708 10.1080/15548627.2017.1356549 28792301 PMC5640208 · DOI
  46. [52]Dossou A.S. Basu A. The emerging roles of mTORC1 in macromanaging autophagy Cancers 2019 11 1422 10.3390/cancers11101422 31554253 PMC6826502 · DOI
  47. [53]Fonseca B.D. Diering G.H. Bidinosti M.A. Dalal K. Alain T. Balgi A.D. Forestieri R. Nodwell M. Rajadurai C.V. Gunaratnam C. Structure-activity analysis of niclosamide reveals potential role for cytoplasmic pH in control of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling J. Biol. Chem. 2012 287 17530 17545 10.1074/jbc.M112.359638 22474287 PMC3366846 · DOI
  48. [54]Saxton R.A. Sabatini D.M. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease Cell 2017 168 960 976 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004 28283069 PMC5394987 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [55]Pesce E. Sondo E. Ferrera L. Tomati V. Caci E. Scudieri P. Musante I. Renda M. Baatallah N. Servel N. The autophagy inhibitor spautin-1 antagonizes rescue of mutant CFTR through an autophagy-independent and USP13-mediated mechanism Front. Pharmacol. 2018 9 1464 10.3389/fphar.2018.01464 30618756 PMC6300570 · DOI
  50. [56]Roden M.M. Lee K.-H. Panelli M.C. Marincola F.M. A novel cytolysis assay using fluorescent labeling and quantitative fluorescent scanning technology J. Immunol. Methods 1999 226 29 41 10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00039-3 10410969 · DOI
  51. [57]Marchand B. Arsenault D. Raymond-Fleury A. Boisvert F.-M. Boucher M.-J. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition induces prosurvival autophagic signals in human pancreatic cancer cells J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 5592 5605 10.1074/jbc.M114.616714 25561726 PMC4342473 · DOI
  52. [58]Kaushal J.B. Sankhwar P. Kumari S. Popli P. Shukla V. Hussain M.K. Hajela K. Dwivedi A. The regulation of Hh/Gli1 signaling cascade involves Gsk3β-mediated mechanism in estrogen-derived endometrial hyperplasia Sci. Rep. 2017 7 6557 10.1038/s41598-017-06370-1 28747625 PMC5529438 · DOI
  53. [59]Takenaka K. Kise Y. Miki H. GSK3β positively regulates Hedgehog signaling through Sufu in mammalian cells Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007 353 501 508 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.058 17182001 · DOI
  54. [60]Stone D.M. Murone M. Luoh S. Ye W. Armanini M.P. Gurney A. Phillips H. Brush J. Goddard A. de Sauvage F.J. Characterization of the human suppressor of fused, a negative regulator of the zinc-finger transcription factor Gli J. Cell Sci. 1999 112 4437 4448 10.1242/jcs.112.23.4437 10564661 · DOI
  55. [61]Honselmann K.C. Pross M. Jung C.M.F. Wellner U.F. Deichmann S. Keck T. Bausch D. Regulation mechanisms of the hedgehog pathway in pancreatic cancer: A review JOP J. Pancreas 2015 16 25 32 25640779
  56. [62]Pietrobono S. Gagliardi S. Stecca B. Non-canonical hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: Activation of GLI transcription factors beyond smoothened Front. Genet. 2019 10 556 10.3389/fgene.2019.00556 31244888 PMC6581679 · DOI
  57. [63]Choudhry Z. Rikani A.A. Choudhry A.M. Tariq S. Zakaria F. Asghar M.W. Sarfraz M.K. Haider K. Shafiq A.A. Mobassarah N.J. Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway: A complex network Ann. Neurosci. 2014 21 28 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.210109 25206052 PMC4117150 · DOI
  58. [64]Lee J.Y. Yu S.J. Park Y.G. Kim J. Sohn J. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β phosphorylates p21WAF1/CIP1 for proteasomal degradation after UV irradiation Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007 27 3187 3198 10.1128/MCB.01461-06 17283049 PMC1899930 · DOI
  59. [65]Wang Q. Zhou Y. Wang X. Evers B.M. p27 Kip1 nuclear localization and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitory activity are regulated by glycogen synthase kinase-3 in human colon cancer cells Cell Death Differ. 2008 15 908 919 10.1038/cdd.2008.2 18408738 PMC2432084 · DOI
  60. [66]Mukherji A. Janbandhu V.C. Kumar V. GSK-3β-dependent destabilization of cyclin D1 mediates replicational stress-induced arrest of cell cycle FEBS Lett. 2008 582 1111 1116 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.068 18328826 · DOI
  61. [67]Yoon J.W. Gallant M. Lamm M.L. Iannaccone S. Vieux K.-F. Proytcheva M. Hyjek E. Iannaccone P. Walterhouse D. Noncanonical regulation of the Hedgehog mediator GLI1 by c-MYC in Burkitt lymphoma Mol. Cancer Res. 2013 11 604 615 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0441 23525267 · DOI
  62. [68]Beurel E. Kornprobst M. Eggelpoël B.-V. Cadoret A. Capeau J. Desbois-Mouthon C. GSK-3β reactivation with LY294002 sensitizes hepatoma cells to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis Int. J. Oncol. 2005 27 215 222 10.3892/ijo.27.1.215 15942663 · DOI
  63. [69]Katayama E.S. Hue J.J. Bajor D.L. Ocuin L.M. Ammori J.B. Hardacre J.M. Winter J.M. A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials in pancreatic cancer: What is coming down the pike? Oncotarget 2020 11 3489 10.18632/oncotarget.27727 33014285 PMC7517959 · DOI
  64. [70]Burock S. Daum S. Keilholz U. Neumann K. Walther W. Stein U. Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of orally applied niclosamide in patients with metachronous or sychronous metastases of a colorectal cancer progressing after therapy: The NIKOLO trial BMC Cancer 2018 18 297 10.1186/s12885-018-4197-9 29544454 PMC5856000 · DOI · Paper page
  65. [71]Park S.-J. Shin J.-H. Kang H. Hwang J.-J. Cho D.-H. Niclosamide induces mitochondria fragmentation and promotes both apoptotic and autophagic cell death BMB Rep. 2011 44 517 522 10.5483/BMBRep.2011.44.8.517 21871175 · DOI
  66. [72]Zhang X.-J. Chen S. Huang K.-X. Le W.-D. Why should autophagic flux be assessed? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013 34 595 599 10.1038/aps.2012.184 23474710 PMC4002868 · DOI
  67. [73]Yang A. Herter-Sprie G. Zhang H. Lin E.Y. Biancur D. Wang X. Deng J. Hai J. Yang S. Wong K.-K. Autophagy sustains pancreatic cancer growth through both cell-autonomous and nonautonomous mechanisms Cancer Discov. 2018 8 276 287 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0952 29317452 PMC5835190 · DOI · Paper page
  68. [74]Codogno P. Meijer A.J. Autophagy and signaling: Their role in cell survival and cell death Cell Death Differ. 2005 12 1509 1518 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401751 16247498 · DOI
  69. [75]Montagnani V. Stecca B. Role of protein kinases in hedgehog pathway control and implications for cancer therapy Cancers 2019 11 449 10.3390/cancers11040449 PMC6520855 30934935 · DOI
  70. [76]Niewiadomski P. Niedziółka S.M. Markiewicz Ł. Uśpieński T. Baran B. Chojnowska K. Gli proteins: Regulation in development and cancer Cells 2019 8 147 10.3390/cells8020147 30754706 PMC6406693 · DOI
  71. [77]Trnski D. Sabol M. Gojević A. Martinić M. Ozretić P. Musani V. Ramić S. Levanat S. GSK3β and Gli3 play a role in activation of Hedgehog-Gli pathway in human colon cancer—Targeting GSK3β downregulates the signaling pathway and reduces cell proliferation Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2015 1852 2574 2584 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.09.005 26385428 · DOI
  72. [78]Shimasaki T. Kitano A. Motoo Y. Minamoto T. Aberrant glycogen synthase kinase 3β in the development of pancreatic cancer J. Carcinog. 2012 11 15 10.4103/1477-3163.100866 23230392 PMC3516047 · DOI
  73. [79]Ding L. Madamsetty V.S. Kiers S. Alekhina O. Ugolkov A. Dube J. Zhang Y. Zhang J.-S. Wang E. Dutta S.K. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to chemotherapy by abrogating the TopBP1/ATR-mediated DNA damage response Clin. Cancer Res. 2019 25 6452 6462 31533931 PMC6825568

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaushal, J., Bhatia, R., Kanchan, R., Raut, P., Mallapragada, S., Ly, Q., Batra, S., & Rachagani, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rachagani, Satyanarayana
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
13
Issue
13
Pages
3105
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173192835
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@UNMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA247763; CA238953; CA217798; CA 228524; CA206444)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
niclosamide, pancreatic cancer, GSK3β phosphorylation, Gli3, SUFU, autophagy, mTORC1, autophagic cell death, mitochondrial stress, reactive oxygen species, drug repurposing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review