Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

miR-154-5p Is a Novel Endogenous Ligand for TLR7 Inducing Microglial Activation and Neuronal Injury

McGurran, Hugo, Kumbol, Victor, Krüger, Christina, Wallach, Thomas, Lehnardt, Seija·2024·Cells

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a collection of pattern recognition sensors that form a first line of defence by detecting pathogen- or damage-associated molecular patterns and initiating an inflammatory response. TLR activation in microglia, the major immune cells in the brain, can trigger the release of inflammatory molecules, which may contribute to various CNS diseases including Alzheimer’s disease. Recently, some microRNAs were shown to serve as signalling molecules for TLRs. Here, we present miR-154-5p as a novel TLR7 ligand. Exposing microglia to miR-154-5p results in cytokine release and alters expression of the TLR signalling pathway dependent on TLR7. Additionally, miR-154-5p causes neuronal injury in enriched cortical neuron cultures and additive toxicity in the presence of microglia. Finally, intrathecal injection of miR-154-5p into mice leads to neuronal injury and accumulation of microglia in the cerebral cortex dependent on TLR7 expression. In conclusion, this study establishes miR-154-5p as a direct activator of TLR7 that can cause neuroinflammation and neuronal injury, which may contribute to CNS disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cells13050407

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 miR-154-5p activates mouse and human TLR7. Human (A,B) and murine (C,D) TLR7/8 HEK293-derived reporter and corresponding null control cell lines were stimulated with synthetic miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or controls for 24 h. Unstimulated, Lyovec, and control oligo (10 μg/mL) conditions served as negative controls, while TLR7 agonist Loxoribine (1 mM) and TLR7/8 agonist R848 (100 ng/mL) served as positive controls. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM with n = 3. Significance determined using Student’s t-test compared to respective control line with same condition (*) or by Student’s t-test compared to miR-154-5p (#/n.s). (E) TNF levels in the supernatant were assessed by ELISA after 24 h stimulation of both wild-type (WT) and Tlr7−/− microglia with Lyovec, control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), or Loxoribine (1 mM). Significance determined by Student’s t-test relative to Tlr7−/− levels for indicated condition. (F) Dose response of WT microglia after 24 h stimulation with indicated concentration of miR-154-5p. Significance determined One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparison compared to unstimulated (*) or by Student’s t-test compared to miR-154-5p (n.s). (G) Representative images of WT and Tlr7−/− microglia immunostained with IBA1 antibody and treated with control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), Loxoribine (1 mM), or LPS (100 ng/mL, TLR4 agonist) for 24 h, demonstrating alterations in microglial morphology. Scale bar represents 50 μm. */# p < 0.05, **/## p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1 miR-154-5p activates mouse and human TLR7. Human (A,B) and murine (C,D) TLR7/8 HEK293-derived reporter and corresponding null control cell lines were stimulated with synthetic miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or controls for 24 h. Unstimulated, Lyovec, and control oligo (10 μg/mL) conditions served as negative controls, while TLR7 agonist Loxoribine (1 mM) and TLR7/8 agonist R848 (100 ng/mL) served as positive controls. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM with n = 3. Significance determined using Student’s t-test compared to respective control line with same condition (*) or by Student’s t-test compared to miR-154-5p (#/n.s). (E) TNF levels in the supernatant were assessed by ELISA after 24 h stimulation of both wild-type (WT) and Tlr7−/− microglia with Lyovec, control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), or Loxoribine (1 mM). Significance determined by Student’s t-test relative to Tlr7−/− levels for indicated condition. (F) Dose response of WT microglia after 24 h stimulation with indicated concentration of miR-154-5p. Significance determined One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparison compared to unstimulated (*) or by Student’s t-test compared to miR-154-5p (n.s). (G) Representative images of WT and Tlr7−/− microglia immunostained with IBA1 antibody and treated with control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), Loxoribine (1 mM), or LPS (100 ng/mL, TLR4 agonist) for 24 h, demonstrating alterations in microglial morphology. Scale bar represents 50 μm. */# p < 0.05, **/## p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 miR-154-5p alters components of the TLR signalling pathway in microglia. WT and Tlr7−/− microglia were stimulated with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) for 24 h, then analysed for TLR signalling pathway components by RT-qPCR. Data is expressed as the mean fold change ± SEM compared to unstimulated control as indicated by the dashed line at y = 1.
Figure 2 miR-154-5p alters components of the TLR signalling pathway in microglia. WT and Tlr7−/− microglia were stimulated with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) for 24 h, then analysed for TLR signalling pathway components by RT-qPCR. Data is expressed as the mean fold change ± SEM compared to unstimulated control as indicated by the dashed line at y = 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 miR-154-5p causes dose- and time-dependent neuronal injury. (A,B) Primary neuron cultures were stimulated for 5 or 8 days with control oligo (10 μg/mL) as a negative control, indicated dose of miR-154-5p, or Loxoribine (1 mM) as a positive control, and cell toxicity was assessed by quantification of NeuN- or TUNEL-positivity. (C) Representative images based on percentage change to unstimulated for 8 day stimulation with control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or Loxoribine (1 mM). (D) Primary Tlr7−/− neurons were stimulated for 5 or 8 days with control oligo (10 μg/mL) as a negative control, miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), or LPS (100 ng/mL) as a positive control for microglial activation and immunostained with NeuN antibody for quantification. (E) Primary neuronal and microglial co-cultures were stimulated with indicated dose of miR-154-5p for 5 days and subsequently immunostained with NeuN antibody and quantified. (F) Representative images of co-cultures immunostained with NeuN and IBA1 antibodies after 5 days stimulation with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or control oligo (10 μg/mL) and Loxoribine (1 mM) serving as controls. Scale bar represents 25 μm. Significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared to unstimulated control (*) or Control oligo (†) or by Student’s t-test comparing the highest dose miR-154-5p to positive control (n.s/#). */†/# p < 0.05, **/‡ p < 0.01, ***/†† p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3 miR-154-5p causes dose- and time-dependent neuronal injury. (A,B) Primary neuron cultures were stimulated for 5 or 8 days with control oligo (10 μg/mL) as a negative control, indicated dose of miR-154-5p, or Loxoribine (1 mM) as a positive control, and cell toxicity was assessed by quantification of NeuN- or TUNEL-positivity. (C) Representative images based on percentage change to unstimulated for 8 day stimulation with control oligo (10 μg/mL), miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or Loxoribine (1 mM). (D) Primary Tlr7−/− neurons were stimulated for 5 or 8 days with control oligo (10 μg/mL) as a negative control, miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL), or LPS (100 ng/mL) as a positive control for microglial activation and immunostained with NeuN antibody for quantification. (E) Primary neuronal and microglial co-cultures were stimulated with indicated dose of miR-154-5p for 5 days and subsequently immunostained with NeuN antibody and quantified. (F) Representative images of co-cultures immunostained with NeuN and IBA1 antibodies after 5 days stimulation with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or control oligo (10 μg/mL) and Loxoribine (1 mM) serving as controls. Scale bar represents 25 μm. Significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared to unstimulated control (*) or Control oligo (†) or by Student’s t-test comparing the highest dose miR-154-5p to positive control (n.s/#). */†/# p < 0.05, **/‡ p < 0.01, ***/†† p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Intrathecal injection of miR-154-5p into mice induces microglial accumulation and neuronal injury. (A) Mice were intrathecally injected with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or control oligo (10 μg/mL) and sacrificed after 3 days. Sections were immunostained with IBA1 and NeuN antibodies to mark microglia and neurons, respectively. Microglia were quantified in 6 total fields of both hemispheres at 20× magnification. (B) Representative images based on average number of microglia per field. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (C) Average number of NeuN-positive cells in 6 fields of both hemispheres. (D) Representative images based on average number of NeuN-positive cells per field. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test on all conditions to account for both treatment and genetic background. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4 Intrathecal injection of miR-154-5p into mice induces microglial accumulation and neuronal injury. (A) Mice were intrathecally injected with miR-154-5p (10 μg/mL) or control oligo (10 μg/mL) and sacrificed after 3 days. Sections were immunostained with IBA1 and NeuN antibodies to mark microglia and neurons, respectively. Microglia were quantified in 6 total fields of both hemispheres at 20× magnification. (B) Representative images based on average number of microglia per field. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (C) Average number of NeuN-positive cells in 6 fields of both hemispheres. (D) Representative images based on average number of NeuN-positive cells per field. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test on all conditions to account for both treatment and genetic background. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Khakpour, 2015, Vascular endothelial cell Toll-like receptor pathways in sepsis, Innate Immun., 21, 827, 10.1177/1753425915606525 · DOI
  2. Hanke, 2011, Toll-like receptors in health and disease in the brain: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential, Clin. Sci. Lond. Engl. 1979, 121, 367
  3. Gao, 2017, Inhibition of toll-like receptor signaling as a promising therapy for inflammatory diseases: A journey from molecular to nano therapeutics, Front. Physiol., 8, 508, 10.3389/fphys.2017.00508 · DOI
  4. Li, 2021, Role of Toll-Like Receptors in Neuroimmune Diseases: Therapeutic Targets and Problems, Front. Immunol., 12, 777606, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.777606 · DOI
  5. Majidi, 2015, Toll-Like Receptors in the Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Diseases, Adv. Pharm. Bull., 5, 605, 10.15171/apb.2015.082 · DOI
  6. Lehmann, 2012, An unconventional role for miRNA: Let-7 activates Toll-like receptor 7 and causes neurodegeneration, Nat. Neurosci., 15, 827, 10.1038/nn.3113 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lehmann, 2012, Extracellularly Delivered Single-Stranded Viral RNA Causes Neurodegeneration Dependent on TLR7, J. Immunol., 189, 1448, 10.4049/jimmunol.1201078 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Luo, Z., Su, R., Wang, W., Liang, Y., Zeng, X., Shereen, M.A., Bashir, N., Zhang, Q., Zhao, L., and Wu, K. (2019). EV71 infection induces neurodegeneration via activating TLR7 signaling and IL-6 production. PLoS Pathog., 15. · DOI
  9. Deng, L., Gao, R., Chen, H., Jiao, B., Zhang, C., Wei, L., Yan, C., Ye-Lehmann, S., Zhu, T., and Chen, C. (2023). Let-7b-TLR7 Signaling Axis Contributes to the Anesthesia/Surgery-Induced Cognitive Impairment. Mol. Neurobiol. · DOI
  10. Liu, 2017, Tlr7 Deletion Selectively Ameliorates Spatial Learning but does not Influence beta Deposition and Inflammatory Response in an Alzheimers Disease Mouse Model, Neuropsychiatry, 7, 509
  11. Ha, 2014, Regulation of microRNA biogenesis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 15, 509, 10.1038/nrm3838 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Peng, 2016, The role of microRNAs in human cancer, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., 1, 15004, 10.1038/sigtrans.2015.4 · DOI
  13. Peters, 2020, Small Things Matter: Relevance of MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Disease, Front. Physiol., 11, 793, 10.3389/fphys.2020.00793 · DOI
  14. Pauley, 2009, MicroRNA in autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases, J. Autoimmun., 32, 189, 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.02.012 · DOI
  15. Kamal, 2015, Current Update on Synopsis of miRNA Dysregulation in Neurological Disorders, CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets, 14, 492, 10.2174/1871527314666150225143637 · DOI
  16. Liang, 2019, Extracellular microRNAs initiate immunostimulation via activating toll-like receptor signaling pathways, ExRNA, 1, 9, 10.1186/s41544-019-0009-x · DOI
  17. Wu, 2021, Sequence-specific extracellular microRNAs activate TLR7 and induce cytokine secretion and leukocyte migration, Mol. Cell Biochem., 476, 4139, 10.1007/s11010-021-04220-3 · DOI
  18. Wallach, 2021, MicroRNA-100-5p and microRNA-298-5p released from apoptotic cortical neurons are endogenous Toll-like receptor 7/8 ligands that contribute to neurodegeneration, Mol. Neurodegener., 16, 80, 10.1186/s13024-021-00498-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wallach, T., Wetzel, M., Dembny, P., Staszewski, O., Krüger, C., Buonfiglioli, A., Prinz, M., and Lehnardt, S. (2020). Identification of CNS Injury-Related microRNAs as Novel Toll-Like Receptor 7/8 Signaling Activators by Small RNA Sequencing. Cells, 9. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Woodbury, 2015, miR-155 Is Essential for Inflammation-Induced Hippocampal Neurogenic Dysfunction, J. Neurosci., 35, 9764, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4790-14.2015 · DOI
  21. Kho, 2016, Dynamic Modulation of Microglia/Macrophage Polarization by miR-124 after Focal Cerebral Ischemia, J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol., 11, 733, 10.1007/s11481-016-9700-y · DOI
  22. Chen, 2023, Exosomes from ADSCs ameliorate nerve damage in the hippocampus caused by post traumatic brain injury via the delivery of circ-Scmh1 promoting microglial M2 polarization, Injury, 54, 110927, 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110927 · DOI
  23. Chi, 2019, SNHG5 Promotes Breast Cancer Proliferation by Sponging the miR-154-5p/PCNA Axis, Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids, 17, 138, 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.013 · DOI
  24. Xin, 2014, miR-154 suppresses colorectal cancer cell growth and motility by targeting TLR2, Mol. Cell Biochem., 387, 271, 10.1007/s11010-013-1892-3 · DOI
  25. Wei, 2019, LncRNA X inactive specific transcript contributes to neuropathic pain development by sponging miR-154-5p via inducing toll-like receptor 5 in CCI rat models, J. Cell Biochem., 120, 1271, 10.1002/jcb.27088 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2017, MiRNA-154-5p inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis by targeting PIWIL1 in glioblastoma, Brain Res., 1676, 69, 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.08.014 · DOI
  27. Guedes, 2016, MicroRNA deregulation and chemotaxis and phagocytosis impairment in Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimers Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit., 3, 7
  28. Han, 2022, Circulating exo-miR-154-5p regulates vascular dementia through endothelial progenitor cell-mediated angiogenesis, Front. Cell Neurosci., 16, 881175, 10.3389/fncel.2022.881175 · DOI
  29. Zhao, 2020, SP1 activated-lncRNA SNHG1 mediates the development of epilepsy via miR-154-5p/TLR5 axis, Epilepsy Res., 168, 106476, 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106476 · DOI
  30. Chen, 2020, Long Noncoding RNA SNHG5 Knockdown Alleviates Neuropathic Pain by Targeting the miR-154-5p/CXCL13 Axis, Neurochem. Res., 45, 1566, 10.1007/s11064-020-03021-2 · DOI
  31. Hoffmann, 2007, TLR2 Mediates Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Damage, J. Immunol., 178, 6476, 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6476 · DOI
  32. 2008, TLR7 and TLR8 as targets in cancer therapy, Oncogene, 27, 190, 10.1038/sj.onc.1210913 · DOI
  33. Raden, 2021, Structure-aware machine learning identifies microRNAs operating as Toll-like receptor 7/8 ligands, RNA Biol., 18, 268, 10.1080/15476286.2021.1940697 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lax, 2020, Systemic microbial TLR2 agonists induce neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease mice, J. Neuroinflammation, 17, 55, 10.1186/s12974-020-01738-z · DOI
  35. Buchanan, 2010, Toll-like receptor 4 in CNS pathologies, J. Neurochem., 114, 13, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06736.x · DOI
  36. Ifuku, 2020, Activation of Toll-like receptor 5 in microglia modulates their function and triggers neuronal injury, Acta Neuropathol. Commun., 8, 1, 10.1186/s40478-020-01031-3 · DOI
  37. Derkow, K., Krüger, C., Dembny, P., and Lehnardt, S. (2015). Microglia Induce Neurotoxic IL-17+ γδ T Cells Dependent on TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 Activation. PLoS ONE, 10. · DOI
  38. Frederiksen, H.R., Haukedal, H., and Freude, K. (2019). Cell Type Specific Expression of Toll-Like Receptors in Human Brains and Implications in Alzheimer’s Disease. BioMed Res. Int., 2019. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Santovito, 2020, Noncanonical inhibition of caspase-3 by a nuclear microRNA confers endothelial protection by autophagy in atherosclerosis, Sci. Transl. Med., 12, eaaz2294, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz2294 · DOI
  40. Yang, 2021, MicroRNA Biophysically Modulates Cardiac Action Potential by Direct Binding to Ion Channel, Circulation, 143, 1597, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050098 · DOI
  41. Fabbri, 2012, MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, E2110, 10.1073/pnas.1209414109 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Heppner, 2015, Immune attack: The role of inflammation in Alzheimer disease, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 16, 358, 10.1038/nrn3880 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Tansey, 2022, Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 22, 657, 10.1038/s41577-022-00684-6 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sriram, U., Xu, J., Chain, R.W., Varghese, L., Chakhtoura, M., Bennett, H.L., Zoltick, P.W., and Gallucci, S. (2014). IL-4 Suppresses the Responses to TLR7 and TLR9 Stimulation and Increases the Permissiveness to Retroviral Infection of Murine Conventional Dendritic Cells. PLoS ONE, 9. · DOI
  45. Kim, 2021, MiR-154-5p-MCP1 Axis Regulates Allergic Inflammation by Mediating Cellular Interactions, Front. Immunol., 12, 663726, 10.3389/fimmu.2021.663726 · DOI
  46. Jurk, 2002, Human TLR7 or TLR8 independently confer responsiveness to the antiviral compound R-848, Nat. Immunol., 3, 499, 10.1038/ni0602-499 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Hemmi, 2002, Small anti-viral compounds activate immune cells via the TLR7 MyD88–dependent signaling pathway, Nat. Immunol., 3, 196, 10.1038/ni758 · DOI
  48. Liu, 2013, TLR7 Negatively Regulates Dendrite Outgrowth through the Myd88–c-Fos–IL-6 Pathway, J. Neurosci., 33, 11479, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5566-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Liu, 2023, Activation of TLR7-mediated autophagy increases epileptic susceptibility via reduced KIF5A-dependent GABAA receptor transport in a murine model, Exp. Mol. Med., 55, 1159, 10.1038/s12276-023-01000-5 · DOI
  50. Menassa, 2018, Microglial dynamics during human brain development, Front. Immunol., 9, 1014, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01014 · DOI
  51. Paolicelli, 2011, Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development, Science, 333, 1456, 10.1126/science.1202529 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Cornell, 2022, Microglia regulation of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory, Neural Regen. Res., 17, 705, 10.4103/1673-5374.322423 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Custodero, 2022, Role of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis, GeroScience, 44, 1373, 10.1007/s11357-022-00556-w · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGurran, H., Kumbol, V., Krüger, C., Wallach, T., & Lehnardt, S.
Affiliations
  • Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Venue
Cells
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-02-26
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
407
ISSN
2073-4409
Cited by
12
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-TRR 167/B03, LE 2420/7-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review