Cited by 9Polymer Surface Interaction StudiesBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingAntimicrobial agents and applications

Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Anti-Biofilm Activity for Dental Implantology Applications

Open access
Marinas, Ioana Cristina, Tihauan, Bianca Maria, Diaconu, Andreea Gabriela, Filip, Xenia, Petran, Anca, Grosu, Ioana-Georgeta, Bogdan, Diana, Barbu, Lucian +4 more·2021·Coatings

Abstract

Coating the surfaces of implantable materials with various active principles to ensure inhibition of microbial adhesion, is a solution to reduce infections associated with dental implant. The aim of the study was to optimize the polydopamine films coating on the Ti-6Al-6V alloy surface in order to obtain a maximum of antimicrobial/antibiofilm efficacy and reduced cytotoxicity. Surface characterization was performed by evaluating the morphology (SEM, AFM) and structures (Solid-state 13C NMR and EPR). Antimicrobial activity was assessed by logarithmic reduction of CFU/mL, and the antibiofilm activity by reducing the adhesion of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans strains. The release of NO was observed especially for C. albicans strain, which confirms the results obtained for microbial adhesion. Among the PDA coatings, for 0.45:0.88 (KMnO4:dopamine) molar ratio the optimal compromise was obtained in terms of antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity, while the 0.1:1.5 ratio (KMnO4:dopamine) led to higher NO release and implicitly the reduction of the adhesion capacities only for C. albicans, being slightly cytotoxic but with moderate release of LDH. The proposed materials can be used to reduce the adhesion of yeast to the implantable material and thus inhibit the formation of microbial biofilms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/coatings11111385

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polydopamine exhibits inherent antibacterial and antibiofilm activities.

    “Polydopamine exhibits inherent antibacterial and antibiofilm activities.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Results (section 3.3; page unavailable) report that polydopamine-coated alloy discs prevented C. albicans adhesion, supporting an antibiofilm effect in that setting. But the Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) says bacterial reductions were less pronounced, and the study used coatings made with KMnO4, with better reductions at higher KMnO4 content. It does not establish that polydopamine itself has inherent antibacterial and antibiofilm activity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such modifications interfere with the initial adhesion of bacteria and effectively suppress the development of dental plaque biofilms.

    “Such modifications interfere with the initial adhesion of bacteria and effectively suppress the development of dental plaque biofilms.14,65”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes earlier work in which PDA-functionalized films prevented bacterial adhesion. But this paper’s Antibiofilm Activity results found reduced adhesion chiefly for C. albicans, a yeast: S. aureus colonized coated discs, and E. coli grew on neither coated nor uncoated discs. The paper does not establish effective suppression of dental plaque biofilms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PDA coatings modulate key physicochemical surface properties, including surface energy, surface charge, and hydrophilicity.

    “PDA coatings are capable of modulating key physicochemical surface properties, including surface energy, surface charge, and hydrophilicity.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Structural and Morphological Characterization section describes PDA film coverage and morphology, and the Discussion describes the coated surface as relatively rough. Neither section addresses whether PDA coatings modulate surface energy, surface charge, or hydrophilicity; searches for those terms and for wettability and contact angle found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vitro degradation studies have shown that under oxidative conditions (0.1 mmol L−1 H2O2, pH 7.4, 37 °C), PDA film thickness decreases by approximately 42% within 30 days.

    “In vitro degradation studies have shown that under oxidative conditions (0.1 mmol L−1 H2O2, pH 7.4, 37 °C), PDA film thickness decreases by approximately 42% within 30 days.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    Section 3.1 reports initial PDA film thicknesses of approximately 10–20 nm and no detachment after 30 minutes of ultrasonication. It does not report a 30-day degradation study or a 42% thickness decrease under the stated H₂O₂ conditions. Searches for those conditions and for oxidative degradation found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The in vivo degradation of PDA exhibits a characteristic two-stage process, described as 'surface etching followed by interlayer delamination.'

    “The in vivo degradation of PDA exhibits a characteristic two-stage process, described as “surface etching followed by interlayer delamination.””

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Structural and Morphological Characterization section describes acid etching of the substrate before PDA coating and reports that the film did not detach after 30 minutes of ultrasonication. Searches for the quoted two-stage process and for in vivo PDA degradation found no passage describing surface etching followed by interlayer delamination. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Ghensi, P.; Bettio, E.; Maniglio, D.; Bonomi, E.; Piccoli, F.; Gross, S.; Caciagli, P.; Segata, N.; Nollo, G.; Tessarolo, F. Dental Implants with Anti-Biofilm Properties: A Pilot Study for Developing a New Sericin-Based Coating. Materials 2019, 12, 2429. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Harris, L.G.; Richards, R.G. Staphylococci and implant surfaces: A review. Injury 2006, 37, 3-14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Kato, K.; Uchida, E.; Kang, E.T.; Uyama, Y.; Ikada, Y. Polymer surface with graft chain. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 209-259. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Chen, W.; Thomas, J.M. Layer-by-Layer Deposition: A Tool for Polymer Surface Modification. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 78-86. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Luo, M.L.; Zhao, J.Q.; Tang, W.; Pu, C.S. Hydrophilic modification of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane surface by self-assembly of TiO 2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 249, 76-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Hegemann, D.; Brunner, H.; Oehr, C. Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2003, 208, 281-286. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-Inspired Surface Chemistry for Multifunctional Coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426-430. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jiang, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, B.; Xu, Y. Surface Characteristics of a Self-Polymerized Dopamine Coating Deposited on Hydrophobic Polymer Films. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14180-14187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ryu, J.H.; Messersmith, P.B.; Lee, H. Polydopamine Surface Chemistry: A Decade of History. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7523-7540. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  10. Salomäki, M.; Martilla, L.; Kivellä, H.; Ouvinen, T.; Lukkari, H. Effects of pH and Oxidants on the First Steps of Polydopamine Formation: A Thermodynamic Approach. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 6314-6327. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Liebscher, J.; Mrowczynski, R.; Scheidt, H.A.; Filip, C.; Hadade, D.N.; Turcu, R.; Bende, A.; Beck, S. Structure of Polydopamine: A Never-Ending Story. Langmuir 2013, 29, 10539-10548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cîrcu, M.; Filip, C. Closer to the polydopamine structure: New insights from a combined 13 C/ 1 H/ 2 H solid-state NMR study on deuterated sample. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 3379-3387. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Ball, V. Polydopamine Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Synthesis Methods and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Singh, I.; Dhawan, G.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, P. Recent Advances in a Polydopamine Mediated Antimicrobial Adhesion System. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 1-17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ball, V. Physicochemical perspective on polydopamine and poly(catechoamine) films for their applications in biomaterial coatings. Biointerphases 2014, 9, 030801. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Lim, K.; Chua, R.R.Y.; Ho, B.; Tambyah, P.A.; Hadinoto, K.; Leong, S.S.J. Development of a catheter functionalized by a polydopamine peptide coating with antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties. Acta Biomater. 2015, 15, 127-138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  17. Neethu, S.; Midhun, S.J.; Radhakrishnan, E.; Jyothis, M. Surface functionalization of central venous catheterwith mycofabricated silver nanoparticles and its antibiofilm activity on multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 138, 103832. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Petran, A.; Mrowczynski, R.; Filip, C.; Turcu, R.; Liebscher, J. Melanin-like polydopa amides-synthesis and applications in functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2139-2149. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Zhang, C.; Ou, Y.; Lei, W.-X.; Wan, L.-S.; Ji, J.; Xu, Z.-K. CuSO 4 /H 2 O 2 -Induced Rapid Deposition of Polydopamine Coatings with High Uniformity and Enhanced Stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3054-3057. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Tahroudia, Z.M.; Razmjoua, A.; Bagheriana, M.; Asadniac, M. Polydopamine surface modification with UV-shielding effect using KMnO 4 as an efficient oxidizing agent. Colloids Surf. A 2018, 559, 68-73. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Khanzada, N.K.; Rehman, S.; Leu, S.Y.; An, A.K. Evaluation of anti-bacterial adhesion performance of polydopamine cross-linked graphene oxide RO membrane via in situ optical coherence tomography. Desalination 2020, 479, 114339. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Luo, C.; Liu, W.; Luo, B.; Tian, J.; Wen, W.; Liu, M.; Zhou, C. Antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility of chitooligosaccharide- modified polyurethane membrane via polydopamine adhesive layer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 156, 235-243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  23. Ahmed, S.B.; Hasane, A.; Wang, Z.; Mansurov, A.; Castrilloìn, S.R.V. Bacterial adhesion to ultrafiltration membranes: Role of hydrophilicity, natural organic matter, and cell-surface macromolecules. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 162-172.
  24. Quinteros, M.A.; Aristizábal, V.C.; Dalmasso, P.R.; Paraje, M.G.; Páez, P.L. Oxidative stress generation of silver nanoparticles in three bacterial genera and its relationship with the antimicrobial activity. Toxicol. In Vitro 2016, 36, 216-223. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Mrówczy ński, R.; Coy, L.E.; Scheibe, B.; Czechowski, T.; Augustyniak-Jabłokow, M.; Jurga, S.; Tadyszak, K. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy of Polydopamine Radicals. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 10341-10347. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  26. Popa, A.; Raita, O.; Stan, M.; Pana, O.; Borodi, G.; Giurgiu, L.M. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Mn-Doped Sn 1-x Mn x O 2 Powders. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2012, 42, 453-462. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Miranda, J.E.A.; Sotomayor, C.E.; Albesa, I.; Paraje, M.G. Oxidative and nitrosative stress in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 315, 23-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Ogunyemi, S.O.; Zhang, M.; Abdallah, Y.; Ahmed, T.; Qiu, W.; Ali, M.A.; Yan, C.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, B. The Bio-Synthesis of Three Metal Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO, MnO 2 , and MgO) and Their Antibacterial Activity against the Bacterial Leaf Blight Pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 588326. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Cazzaniga, G.; Ottobelli, M.; Ionescu, A.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Brambilla, E. Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: A review of the current literature. Am. J. Dent. 2015, 28, 311-320.
  30. Katsikogianni, M.; Missirlis, Y.F. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2004, 8, 37-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Liu, Y.; Ai, K.; Lu, L. Polydopamine and Its Derivative Materials: Synthesis and Promising Applications in Energy, Environmental, and Biomedical Fields. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5057-5115. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lei, W.; Ren, K.; Chen, T.; Chen, X.; Li, B.; Chang, H.; Ji, J. Polydopamine Nanocoating for Effective Photothermal Killing of Bacteria, and Fungus upon Near-Infrared Irradiation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1600767. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Koopaie, M.; Bordbar-Khiabani, A.; Kolahdooz, S.; Darbandsari, A.K.; Mozafari, M. Advanced surface treatment techniques counteract biofilm-associated infections on dental implants. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 015417. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Feng, Y.; Ma, X.; Chang, L.; Zhu, S.; Guan, S. Characterization and cytocompatibility of polydopamine on MAO-HA coating supported on Mg-Zn-Ca alloy. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017, 49, 1115-1123. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  35. Francolini, I.; Donelli, G.; Crisante, F.; Taresco, V.; Piozzi, A. Antimicrobial Polymers for Anti-Biofilm Medical Devices: State-of-Art and Perspectives. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 831, 93-117.
  36. Sadrearhami, Z.; Nguyen, T.-K.; Namivandi-Zangeneh, R.; Jung, K.; Wong, E.H.H.; Boyer, C. Recent Advances in Nitric Oxide Delivery for Antimicrobial Applications Using Polymer-Based Systems. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 2945-2959. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Sadrearhami, Z.; Shafiee, F.N.; Ho, K.K.K.; Kumar, N.; Krasowska, M.; Blencowe, A.; Wong, E.H.H.; Boyer, C. Antibiofilm Nitric Oxide-Releasing Polydopamine Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 7320-7329. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Pant, J.; Gao, J.; Goudie, M.J.; Hopkins, S.P.; Locklin, J.; Handa, H. A Multi-Defense Strategy: Enhancing Bactericidal Activity of a Medical Grade Polymer with a Nitric Oxide Donor and Surface-Immobilized Quaternary Ammonium Compound. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 421-431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  39. Fleming, G.; Aveyard, J.; Fothergill, J.; McBride, F.; Raval, R.; D'Sa, R. Nitric Oxide Releasing Polymeric Coatings for the Prevention of Biofilm Formation. Polymers 2017, 9, 601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  40. Peralta, M.A.; da Silva, M.A.; Ortega, M.G.; Cabrera, J.L.; Paraje, M.G. Usnic Acid Activity on Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress of Azole-Resistant Candida albicans Biofilm. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 326-333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  41. de Mendoza, I.L.I.; Cayero-Garay, A.; Quindós-Andrés, G.; Aguirre-Urizar, J.M. A systematic review on the implication of Candida in peri-implantitis. Int. J. Implant Dent. 2021, 7, 73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  42. Bürgers, R.; Hahnel, S.; Reichert, T.E.; Rosentritt, M.; Behr, M.; Gerlach, T.; Handel, G.; Gosau, M. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 2307-2313. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marinas, I. C., Tihauan, B. M., Diaconu, A. G., Filip, X., Petran, A., Grosu, I.-G., Bogdan, D., Barbu, L., Ivanof, A. M., Angheloiu, M., Pircalabioru, G. G., & Filip, C.
Affiliations
  • S.C. TEODENT SRL, Str. Lucian Blaga, No. 4, 240028 Rm. Vâlcea, Romania
  • University of Bucharest (RO)
  • National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies (RO)
  • National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Str. Donat, No. 67-103, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Research Institute of the University of Bucharest-ICUB, 91-95 Spl. Independentei, 50567 Bucharest, Romania
Venue
Coatings
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-11-12
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1385
ISSN
2079-6412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213931707
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Coatings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministerul Cercetării și Inovării (POC P_40_404, SMIS 105533)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
polydopamine coating, Ti-6Al-4V alloy, dental implants, antibiofilm activity, antimicrobial activity, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, nitric oxide release, potassium permanganate, surface modification, cytotoxicity, biofilm inhibition, microbial adhesion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review