Cited by 22Skin Protection and AgingElasticity and Material ModelingDermatologic Treatments and Research

Research on the Correlation Between Skin Elasticity Evaluation Parameters and Age

Open access
Chen, Dandan, Yin, Shipeng, Lu, Xuelian, Fu, Haokun, Gao, Hongqi, Zhang, Suning·2024·Cosmetics

Abstract

This study aims to explore the impact of aging on skin elasticity, a key biomechanical property that diminishes over time, using the Cutometer to assess viscoelastic parameters. Methods: Researchers analyzed 22 viscoelastic parameters from the facial skin of 60 women aged 18 to 70. Key Results: The findings indicate that relaxation phase parameters, particularly biological elasticity (R7), exhibited the strongest negative correlation with age (r = −0.62), signifying a notable decline in biological elasticity as women age. In contrast, maximum deformation during the first cycle (R0) and the total area under the upper curve after 10 cycles of deformation (F4) also showed significant negative correlations with age (r = −0.47, r = −0.48), suggesting that younger skin typically presents higher values. These correlations raise questions regarding practical applications, as the presence of moisturizers and emollients may alter the stratum corneum’s properties, thus impacting these measurements. Additionally, the ratio of delayed deformation to instantaneous deformation (R6) demonstrated a positive correlation with age (r = 0.49), indicating its potential as a marker for skin aging. Conclusions: This study highlights the critical role of relaxation phase parameters in accurately reflecting skin elasticity changes associated with aging. The results offer valuable insights for evaluating cosmetic efficacy, reinforcing the need for a nuanced understanding of how various parameters interact. These findings contribute to the ongoing development of more effective anti-aging treatments and products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cosmetics11060205

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elastic recovery reflects the biomechanical properties of the skin and is influenced by collagen and elastin networks as well as hydration status.

    “Elastic recovery reflects the biomechanical properties of the skin and is influenced by collagen and elastin networks as well as hydration status [34,51,52].”

    From A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effects of Oral Centella asiatica Extract on Skin Aging-Related Parameters in Middle-Aged Korean Women. (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes skin elasticity as a biomechanical indicator, identifies elastic recovery as a measurement parameter, and says hydration can affect skin properties such as elasticity. It also links loss of elastic fibers to reduced skin flexibility. The paper does not establish that collagen and elastin networks, or hydration specifically, influence elastic recovery; its Future Directions section proposes studying hydration alongside Cutometer parameters. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Berardesca, E.; Maibach, H.I.; Wilhelm, K.-P. (Eds.) Non Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Clinical Dermatology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013.

Authors
Chen, D., Yin, S., Lu, X., Fu, H., Gao, H., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Shanghai Forest Cabin Biological-Tech Co., Ltd., Songjiang, Shanghai 201612, China
Corresponding author
Zhang, Suning
Venue
Cosmetics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-26
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
205
ISSN
2079-9284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404711810
Cited by
22
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cosmetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
skin elasticity, skin aging, viscoelasticity, Cutometer, facial skin, women, anti-aging cosmetics, stratum corneum, delayed deformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review