Cited by 30Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Direct Measurement of Forest Degradation Rates in Malawi: Toward a National Forest Monitoring System to Support REDD+

Open access
Skole, David L., Samek, Jay H., Mbow, Cheikh, Chirwa, Michael, Ndalowa, Dan, Tumeo, Tangu, Kachamba, Daud, Kamoto, Judith +2 more·2021·Forests

Abstract

Spatial time-series measurements of forest degradation rates are important for estimating national greenhouse gas emissions but have been challenging for open forests and woodlands. This lack of quantitative data on forest degradation rates, location and biomass is an important constraint to developing national REDD+ policy. In Malawi, and in most countries in Africa, most assessments of forest cover change for carbon emissions monitoring tend to report only deforestation in the public forest estate managed by the government, even when important forest degradation also occurs in agricultural areas, such as customary forests and other tree-based systems. This study has resulted in: (a) a new robust forest map for Malawi, (b) spatial and quantitative measurements of both forest degradation and deforestation, and (c) a demonstration of the approach through the introduction of a tool that maps across the broad landscape of forests and trees outside of forests. The results can be used to support REDD+ National Forest Monitoring Systems. This analysis produces new estimates of landscape-wide deforestation rates between 2000–2009 (22,410 ha yr−1) and 2009–2015 (38,937 ha yr−1). We further produce new estimates of the rate of forest degradation between 2000–2009 (42,961 ha yr−1) and 2009–2015 (71,878 ha yr−1). The contribution of these new tools and estimates to capacities for calculating carbon emissions are important, increasing prospects for full REDD+ readiness across semi-arid Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/f12040426

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rates revealed in this study were higher than those obtained by global forest watch because global forest watch considered deforestation only in government forests, excluding agricultural lands and community forests.

    “The rates revealed in this study were higher than those obtained by global forest watch since the study carried out by global forest watch considered deforestation only in government forests, excluding agricultural lands and community forests.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Skole et al. 2021

  • Deforestation rates in Malawi between 2000-2009 and 2009-2015 were 22,410 ha yr−1 and 38,937 ha yr−1, respectively.

    “The analysis indicated that deforestation rates between 2000–2009 and 2009–2015 were 22,410 ha yr−1 and 38,937 ha yr−1, respectively.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Skole et al. 2021

  • Forest degradation rates in Malawi between 2000-2009 and 2009-2015 were 42,961 ha yr−1 and 71,878 ha yr−1, respectively.

    “Additionally, the forest degradation rates between 2000–2009 and 2009–2015 were 42,961 ha yr−1 and 71,878 ha yr−1, respectively.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Skole et al. 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Watson, R.; Noble, I.R.; Bolin, B.; Ravindranath, N.H.; Verardo, D.J.; Dokken, D.J. (Eds.) Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry; A Special Report of the IPCC; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  2. Katumbi, N.; Nyengere, J.; Mkandawire, E. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Dzalanyama forest reserve in Malawi. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 889-893.
  3. Mbow, M.; Skole, D.; Dieng, M.; Justice, C.; Kwesha, D.; Mane, L.; El Gamri, M.; Von Vordzogbe, V.; Virji, H. Challenges and Prospects for REDD+ in Africa: Desk Review of REDD+ Implementation in Africa; GLP Report No. 5. GLP-IPO; GLP International Project Office: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012.
  4. Campbell, B. (Ed.) The Miombo in Transition; Center for International Forestry Research: Bogor, Indonesia, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skole, D. L., Samek, J. H., Mbow, C., Chirwa, M., Ndalowa, D., Tumeo, T., Kachamba, D., Kamoto, J., Chioza, A., & Kamangadazi, F.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • Forestry Research Institute of Malawi (MW)
  • Malawi College of Forestry and Wildlife (MW)
  • Department of Forestry (MW)
  • Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW)
Corresponding author
Skole, David L.
Venue
Forests
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
426
ISSN
1999-4907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3141324578
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forests (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC21K0315)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Keywords
forest degradation, deforestation, REDD+, forest cover change, CO2 emissions, forest mapping, customary forest, agricultural landscapes, Malawi, greenhouse gas emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review