Cited by 62Forest ecology and managementForest Insect Ecology and ManagementSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Consequences of Shifts in Abundance and Distribution of American Chestnut for Restoration of a Foundation Forest Tree

Open access
Dalgleish, Harmony, Nelson, C., Scrivani, John, Jacobs, Douglass·2015·Forests

Abstract

Restoration of foundation species, such as the American chestnut (Castanea dentata) that was devastated by an introduced fungus, can restore ecosystem function. Understanding both the current distribution as well as biogeographic patterns is important for restoration planning. We used United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis data to quantify the current density and distribution of C. dentata. We then review the literature concerning biogeographic patterns in C. dentata. Currently, 431 ± 30.2 million stems remain. The vast majority (360 ± 22 million) are sprouts <2.5 cm dbh. Although this number is approximately 10% of the estimated pre-blight population, blight has caused a major shift in the size structure. The current-day population has a larger range, particularly west and north, likely due to human translocation. While climate change could facilitate northward expansion, limited seed reproduction makes this unlikely without assisted migration. Previous research demonstrates that the current, smaller population contains slightly higher genetic diversity than expected, although little information exists on biogeographic patterns in the genetics of adaptive traits. Our research provides a baseline characterization of the contemporary population of C. dentata, to enable monitoring stem densities and range limits to support restoration efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/f7010004

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Appalachian coal mining region corresponds closely with the native range of the American chestnut.

    “The Appalachian coal mining region corresponds closely with the native range of the American chestnut (Jacobs 2004; Fields-Johnson et al. 2010; Dalgleish et al. 2016).”

    From Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines (2018) · cites this paper as Dalgleish et al. 2016

    The Results and Conclusions place American chestnut within the Appalachians and describe the Appalachians as part of its range. The paper does not identify the Appalachian coal mining region or compare its boundaries with the chestnut’s native range, so it does not establish the claimed close correspondence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gravatt, F. Chestnut blight in Asia and North America. Unasylva 1949, 3, 2-7.
  2. Steiner, K.C., Carlson, J.E., Eds.; National Park Service: Asheville, NC, USA, 2006; pp. 109-122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalgleish, H., Nelson, C., Scrivani, J., & Jacobs, D.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Virginia Information Technologies Agency (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Douglass
Venue
Forests
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-12-24
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
4
ISSN
1999-4907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2208787431
Cited by
62
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forests (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
American chestnut, Castanea dentata, chestnut blight, forest restoration, foundation species, population density, size structure, sprouts, biogeographic range, climate change, assisted migration, genetic diversity, adaptive traits, restoration monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review