Cited by 8Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesIonic liquids properties and applicationsAgricultural and Biological Research

Ultrasound-Assisted Green Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction of Flavonoids from Wild Blueberry: Process Optimization, Composition Identification, and Antioxidant Activity

Open access
Ouyang, Le, Liang, Weiwei, Bian, Chun, Shan, Yi, Wang, Shumei·2025·Foods

Abstract

To improve the deep processing and utilization of wild blueberries, this study presents a green and highly efficient method for extracting flavonoids from blueberries. The approach combines natural deep eutectic solvents (NADESs) with ultrasound-assisted extraction. Among the 22 tested NADES, Betaine/urea (BU), was the most effective solvent for extracting flavonoids from blueberries. The extraction parameters of ultrasound-assisted betaine/urea (UABU) were optimized using a response surface methodology (RSM). This optimization procedure yielded the optimized conditions outlined below: a molar ratio of urea to betaine of 3.3:1, a water content of 60% (m/v), an ultrasonic power of 330 W, a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:30, an extraction temperature of 50 °C, and an ultrasonic extraction duration of 30 min. Under these conditions, the total flavonoid content (TFC) extracted using UABU reached 6.06 ± 0.024 mg_RE/g_DW, a 1.44-fold increase compared to ultrasound-assisted 70% (v/v) ethanol (UAE). Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) nontargeted metabolomics analysis revealed that the flavonoids extracted by UABU had highly relative content (RC) of Oenin, 3′-methoxy-4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavonol, Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside and Isoquercitrin. Significant disparities exist regarding the types and RC of flavonoids obtained via UAE. Results from in vitro antioxidant assays demonstrated that UABU has superior antioxidant activity relative to UAE. This study demonstrated the feasibility of using NADESs, specifically BU, as an efficient and eco-friendly extraction medium for flavonoids from wild blueberries. The yield of flavonoids was increased by this method, and bioactive compounds were also protected—findings that underscore the potential of green solvents for application in the food industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/foods14193325

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For solid and semi-solid samples, DES-assisted UAE, MAE, PLE, and NADES-based solid-liquid extraction offer several advantages compared with traditional microextraction techniques.

    “For solid and semi-solid samples, DES-assisted ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and NADESbased solid-liquid extraction offer several advantages compared with traditional microextraction techniques [91,93,95,98,103].”
  • NADES-based solid-liquid extraction has emerged as a promising approach for recovery of natural products because NADESs typically exhibit lower toxicity, improved biocompatibility, and greater suitability for food and pharmaceutical applications than many traditional extraction solvents.

    “In addition, NADES-based solid-liquid extraction has emerged as a promising approach for the recovery of natural products because NADESs typically exhibit lower toxicity, improved biocompatibility, and greater suitability for food and pharmaceutical applications than many traditional extraction solvents [91,93,95,98,103].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouyang, L., Liang, W., Bian, C., Shan, Y., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
Harbin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liang, Weiwei
Venue
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-25
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
3325
ISSN
2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414553548
Cited by
7
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
natural deep eutectic solvents, ultrasound-assisted extraction, flavonoids, Vaccinium angustifolium, green solvents, extraction optimization, untargeted metabolomics, antioxidant activity, isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside, isoquercitrin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review