Cited by 36Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Leveraging responsible, explainable, and local artificial intelligence solutions for clinical public health in the global south

Open access
Kong, Jude Dzevela, Akpudo, Ugochukwu Ejike, Effoduh, Jake Okechukwu, Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi·2023·Healthcare

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the present paper, we will explore how artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics (BDA) can help address clinical public and global health needs in the Global South, leveraging and capitalizing on our experience with the “Africa-Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Innovation Consortium” (ACADIC) Project in the Global South, and focusing on the ethical and regulatory challenges we had to face. “Clinical public health” can be defined as an interdisciplinary field, at the intersection of clinical medicine and public health, whilst “clinical global health” is the practice of clinical public health with a special focus on health issue management in resource-limited settings and contexts, including the Global South. As such, clinical public and global health represent vital approaches, instrumental in (i) applying a community/population perspective to clinical practice as well as a clinical lens to community/population health, (ii) identifying health needs both at the individual and community/population levels, (iii) systematically addressing the determinants of health, including the social and structural ones, (iv) reaching the goals of population’s health and well-being, especially of socially vulnerable, underserved communities, (v) better coordinating and integrating the delivery of healthcare provisions, (vi) strengthening health promotion, health protection, and health equity, and (vii) closing gender inequality and other (ethnic and socio-economic) disparities and gaps. Clinical public and global health are called to respond to the more pressing healthcare needs and challenges of our contemporary society, for which AI and BDA can help unlock new options and perspectives. In the aftermath of the still ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the future trend of AI and BDA in the healthcare field will be devoted to building a more healthy, resilient society, able to face several challenges arising from globally networked hyper-risks, including ageing, multimorbidity, chronic disease accumulation, and climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare11040457

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of representation in datasets during the development phase leads to models trained on biased datasets failing to generalize to underrepresented populations.

    “Firstly, models trained on biased datasets fail to generalize to underrepresented populations.”

    From Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]

    Section 3.5 (page not provided) says findings shaped largely by Global North research may not generalize to the Global South and calls for diverse, representative, locally relevant databases. This supports the concern about underrepresentation, but the citing sentence turns a possible limitation into a categorical claim that models trained on biased datasets fail to generalize. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Citizenship intersects with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, particularly for migrants and undocumented individuals, who often face additional systemic discrimination and healthcare exclusion.

    “Similarly, citizenship intersects with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, particularly for migrants and undocumented individuals, who often face additional systemic discrimination and healthcare exclusion, further underscoring the necessity of integrating an intersectional lens into AI design [35].”

    From Frameworks encompassing intersectional perspective of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]

    Section 3.2 (page unavailable) identifies migrants, people without citizenship rights, racialized minorities, and socioeconomically deprived people as vulnerable groups whose needs are often overlooked in health policy. It does not specifically say that citizenship intersects with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, or that undocumented individuals face additional discrimination and healthcare exclusion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [80]Lysaniuk B. Tabeaud M. Les santés vulnérables des Suds L’Espace Géographique 2015 44 229 244 10.3917/eg.443.0229 · DOI
  2. [95]Pal M. Tiwari R. Dhama K. Parija S. Jena O.P. Mohapatra R.K. Machine Learning Algorithms and COVID-19. A Step for Predicting Future Pandemics with a Systematic Overview Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Medical Data Analytics and Healthcare Applications CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kong, J. D., Akpudo, U. E., Effoduh, J. O., & Bragazzi, N. L.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Kong, Jude Dzevela
  • Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
457
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319298252
Cited by
36
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (109981, 109559-001, RGPIN-2022-04559, DGECR-2022-00454, NFRFE-2021-00879)
  • Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) (109981, 109559-001, RGPIN-2022-04559, DGECR-2022-00454, NFRFE-2021-00879)
  • NSERC Discovery Grant (109981, 109559-001, RGPIN-2022-04559, DGECR-2022-00454, NFRFE-2021-00879)
  • NSERC Discovery Launch Supplement (109981, 109559-001, RGPIN-2022-04559, DGECR-2022-00454, NFRFE-2021-00879)
  • New Frontier in Research Fund- Exploratory (109981, 109559-001, RGPIN-2022-04559, DGECR-2022-00454, NFRFE-2021-00879)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, Global South, explainable AI, responsible AI, big data analytics, AI ethics, AI regulation, resource-limited settings, health equity, underserved populations, COVID-19 pandemic, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review