Cited by 77Air Quality and Health ImpactsDermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Effects of Ambient Fine Particles PM2.5 on Human HaCaT Cells

Open access
Li, Qiao, Kang, Zhihua, Jiang, Shuo, Zhao, Jinzhuo, Yan, Shuxian, Xu, Feng, Xu, Jinhua·2017·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The current study was conducted to observe the effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) cells. The potential mechanism linking PM2.5 and skin was explored. HaCaT cells were cultured and then accessed in plate with PM2.5. Cell viability was tested by Cell Counting Kit-8. The mRNA and protein expression of Filaggrin, Loricrin, Involucrin, and Repetin were analyzed. The levels of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor, Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Interleukin-1α, and Interleukin-8 were detected in the supernatant of the HaCaT cell with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Cell viability decreased with the increase in PM2.5. Compared with the control group, the protein expression of Filaggrin, Repetin, Involucrin, and Loricrin showed different expression patterns in PM2.5 treatment groups. The level of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin, Interleukin-1α, and Interleukin-8 significantly increased in the cells treated with PM2.5. Ambient PM2.5 may increase the risk of eczema and other skin diseases. The relative mechanism may be associated with the impairment of the skin barrier and the elevation of inflammatory responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph14010072

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These PM2.5 doses (used in earlier studies) were cytotoxic to primary keratinocytes in the current study.

    “We found that these PM2.5 doses were cytotoxic to primary keratinocytes in the current study (27–29).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Methods (§2.3) show that this earlier study used a range of PM2.5 doses, and the Results (§3.2) report reduced cell viability at higher doses. However, it tested immortalized HaCaT keratinocytes, not primary keratinocytes; the finding in the citing authors’ current study is not a finding of this source. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Ministry of Environmental Protection of the P.R. China General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the P.R. China Ambient Air Quality Standards GB 3095-2012 Standard Press of China Beijing, China 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., Kang, Z., Jiang, S., Zhao, J., Yan, S., Xu, F., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Feng
  • Xu, Jinhua
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-01-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
72
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2572908310
Cited by
77
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81301361)
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
PM2.5, HaCaT keratinocytes, skin barrier, filaggrin, involucrin, loricrin, cytokines, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, TNF-α, interleukin-8, interleukin-1 alpha, cell viability, atopic dermatitis
MeSH terms
Filaggrin Proteins, Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Protein Precursors, Skin, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Keratinocytes, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Interleukin-8, Particulate Matter, Interleukin-1alpha

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review