CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental Criteria in the Spanish Public Works Procurement Process

Fuentes-Bargues, José, González-Cruz, Mª, González-Gaya, Cristina·2017·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI 10.3390/ijerph14020204PMC PMC5334758
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Green Public Procurement (GPP) is defined as a process of contracting products, services, and works with the least possible damage to the environment during their life cycle. In order to improve the knowledge about GPP, a study of the use of environmental tendering criteria in the Spanish public construction sector has been performed. The results of this study show that the use of environmental criteria in Spanish public sector construction procurement is low in comparison to a certain group of countries, known as “Green 7”, in the European Union. Environmental criteria is the fourth criterion in importance, but its weight in the global of the process is much lower than other criteria such as price, memory of the construction process and the delivery time. National administrations use environmental criteria more frequently because they have more resources and staff training about environmental issues. Environmental criteria are more used in the tendering of civil projects and works whose budget exceeds ten million euro due to the environmental impact of these kind and/or size of projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph14020204

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Study method steps.
Figure 1 Study method steps.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Number of tenders according to weighting of environmental criteria by the construction subsectors.
Figure 2 Number of tenders according to weighting of environmental criteria by the construction subsectors.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Number of tenders according to environmental criteria weighting by the geographical scope of the administration.
Figure 3 Number of tenders according to environmental criteria weighting by the geographical scope of the administration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Number of tenders according to environmental criteria weighting by contract execution budget (in euros).
Figure 4 Number of tenders according to environmental criteria weighting by contract execution budget (in euros).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Spence, 1995, Sustainable development and the construction industry, Habitat Int., 19, 279, 10.1016/0197-3975(94)00071-9 · DOI
  2. Tam, 2004, Green construction assessment for environmental management in the construction industry of Hong Kong, Int. J. Proj, Manag., 22, 563, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.001 · DOI
  3. Sev, 2009, How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework, Sustain. Dev., 17, 161, 10.1002/sd.373 · DOI
  4. Hill, 1997, Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment, Constr. Manag. Econ., 15, 223, 10.1080/014461997372971 · DOI
  5. Tan, 1999, ISO 14000: Its relevance to the construction industry of Singapore and its potential as the next industry milestone, Constr. Manag. Econ., 17, 449, 10.1080/014461999371376 · DOI
  6. Ball, 2002, Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green?, Build. Environ., 37, 421, 10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00031-2 · DOI
  7. MacDonald, 2005, Strategic sustainable development using the ISO 14001 Standard, J. Clean. Prod., 13, 631, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.06.001 · DOI
  8. Reed, 2009, International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools, J. Sustain. Real Estate, 1, 1, 10.1080/10835547.2009.12091787 · DOI
  9. Lam, 2011, Environmental management system vs. green specifications: How do they complement each other in the construction industry?, J. Environ. Manag., 82, 788, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.030 · DOI
  10. Qiao, 2011, Issues and Challenges in Implementing China’s Green Public Procurement Program, J. Environ. Prot., 2, 1034, 10.4236/jep.2011.28119 · DOI
  11. Berardi, 2012, Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings, Sustain. Dev., 20, 411, 10.1002/sd.532 · DOI
  12. 2010, Metodología y herramientas VERDE para la evaluación de la sostenibilidad en edificios, Inf. Constr., 62, 87, 10.3989/ic.08.056 · DOI
  13. Plouffe, 2004, The ecolabel and sustainable development, Int. J. Life-Cycle Assess., 9, 349, 10.1007/BF02979076 · DOI
  14. Domingues, 2015, Defining criteria and indicators for a sustainability label of local public services, Ecol. Indic., 57, 452, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.016 · DOI
  15. Iraldo, 2009, Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union, J. Clean. Prod., 82, 88
  16. Alegre, 2011, Evaluation of environmental management resources (ISO 14001) at civil engineering construction worksites: A case study of the community of Madrid, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 1858, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.008 · DOI
  17. Palmujoki, 2010, Green Public Procurement: Analysis on the Use of Environmental Criteria in Contracts, Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law, 19, 250, 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00681.x · DOI
  18. Large, 2011, Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence from Germany, J. Purch. Supply Manag., 17, 176, 10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006 · DOI
  19. Geng, 2008, Greening government procurement in developing countries: Building capacity in China, J. Environ. Manag., 88, 932, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.016 · DOI
  20. OECD Observer (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Bribery in Procurement, Methods, Actors and Counter-Measures. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/investment/anti-bribery/anti-briberyconvention/44956834.pdf.
  21. Wong, 2008, Construction and economic development: The case of Hong Kong, Constr. Manag. Econ., 26, 813, 10.1080/01446190802189927 · DOI
  22. Aoyagi, 2009, Collusion as public monitoring becomes noisy: Experimental evidence, J. Econ. Theory, 124, 883
  23. Uttam, 2012, EIA and green procurement: Opportunities for strengthening their coordination, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 33, 73, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.007 · DOI
  24. Nissinen, 2012, Environmental impacts and the most economically advantageous tender in public procurement, J. Public Procure., 12, 43, 10.1108/JOPP-12-01-2012-B002 · DOI
  25. Swanson, 2005, Developing priorities for greener stage government purchasing: A California case study, J. Clean. Prod., 13, 669, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.011 · DOI
  26. Bolton, 2006, Government procurement as a policy tool in South Africa, J. Public Procure., 6, 193, 10.1108/JOPP-06-03-2006-B001 · DOI
  27. Bolton, 2008, Protecting the environment through public procurement: The case of South Africa, Nat. Resour. Forum, 32, 1, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00171.x · DOI
  28. Ho, 2010, Green Procurement in the Asian Public sector and the Hong-Kong private sector, Nat. Resour. Forum, 34, 24, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2010.01274.x · DOI
  29. Thai, K.V., and Piga, G. (2006). Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Knowledge-Sharing, PrAcademic Press.
  30. Tukker, 2008, Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 1218, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015 · DOI
  31. Thai, K.V., and Piga, G. (2006). Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Knowledge-Sharing, PrAcademic Press.
  32. Nissinen, 2009, Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005, Ecol. Econ., 68, 1838, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Bratt, 2013, Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 52, 309, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.007 · DOI
  34. Li, 2005, Environmentally responsable public procurement (ERPP) and its implications for integrated product policy (IPP), J. Clean. Prod., 13, 705, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.01.007 · DOI
  35. Michelsen, 2009, Green procurement in Norway: A survey of practices at the municipal and county level, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 160, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Testa, 2012, What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey, Ecol. Econ., 82, 88, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.011 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Igarashi, 2015, Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement, J. Clean. Prod., 108, 442, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.010 · DOI
  38. Testa, 2016, Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: An effective tool for sustainable production, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1893, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.092 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Balfors, 2009, Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: Current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 1214, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001 · DOI
  40. Sterner, E. (2002). Green Procurement of Buildings. Estimation of Environmental Impact and Life-Cycle Cost. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Mining Engineering, Luleá University of Technology]. Available online: http://epubl.ltu.se/1402-1544/2002/09/LTU-DT-0209-SE.pdf.
  41. Faith-Ell, C. (2005). The Application of Environmental Requirements in Procurement of Road Maintenance in Sweden. [Ph.D. Thesis, Land and Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology]. Available online: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:7160/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  42. 2003, Reflexiones sobre la inclusión de aspectos sociales y medioambientales como criterios de adjudicación de los contratos públicos, Contrat. Adm. Pract., 18, 34
  43. FueyoBros, 2003, Criterios Objetivos de Adjudicación de Contratos en la Administración Pública, Contrat. Adm. Pract., 23, 45
  44. 2012, Theiso-Score Curve Graph. A new tool for competitive bidding, Autom. Constr., 22, 481, 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.007 · DOI
  45. 2013, On competitive bidding: Scoring and position probability graphs, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 31, 434, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.012 · DOI
  46. 2010, An ANP and AHP based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 61, 905, 10.1057/jors.2010.13 · DOI
  47. 2008, Contractor selection: Fuzzy control approach, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 35, 473, 10.1139/L07-127 · DOI
  48. 2013, Determination of Disproportionate Tenders in Public Procurement, J. Investig. Manag., 2, 1
  49. 2013, Analysis of the Scoring Formula of Economic Criteria in Public Procurement, Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 1, 1
  50. 2010, Análisis descriptivo de la Dirección Ambiental de Obra en las Declaraciones de Impacto Ambiental de proyectos de Ingeniería Civil, Ing. Civ., 160, 92
  51. Fuentes-Bargues, J.L., and Ferrer-Gisbert, P.S. (, 2014). Metodología para la Dirección Ambiental de Obra en Obras de Edificación. Proceedings of XII Spanish National Congress on Environmental, Madrid, Spain. Available online: http://www.conama2012.conama.org/conama10/download/files/conama2014/CT%202014/1896711453.pdf.
  52. Walter, 2009, Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector, Supply Chain Manag., 14, 128, 10.1108/13598540910941993 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Fuentes-Bargues, J.L. (2013). Propuesta Metodológica para la Determinación del Criterio de Adjudicación Económico en los Concursos Públicos. [Ph.D. Thesis, Departamento de Ingeniería de Construcción y Fabricación, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia]. Available online: http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/tesisuned:IngInd-Jlfuentes/Documento.pd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fuentes-Bargues, J., González-Cruz, M., & González-Gaya, C.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
  • Departamento de Ingeniería de Construcción y Fabricación, ETSII, UNED, C/Ciudad Universitaria S/N, 28040 Madrid, Spain
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-02-18
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
204
ISSN
1660-4601
DOI
10.3390/ijerph14020204
PMC
PMC5334758
Cited by
48
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Universitat Politècnica de València
  • UNED

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review