Cited by 96Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyUrban Transport and Accessibility

Walking for prevention of cardiovascular disease in men and women: a systematic review of observational studies

Open access
Boone‐Heinonen, J., Evenson, K. R., Taber, D. R., Gordon‐Larsen, P.·2009·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: In this systematic review, walking (a generally accessible activity for a largely sedentary population) was assessed as a preventive risk factor for development of fatal and non‐fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD). PubMed, CINHAL and reference list searches identified 21 peer‐reviewed publications examining walking in relation to CVD; studies assessing active transportation were excluded. Generally, there were dose‐dependent reductions in CVD risk with higher walking duration, distance, energy expenditure and pace. Associations appeared to be stronger for ischaemic stroke than other CVD outcomes such as coronary heart disease or haemorrhagic stroke. Adjustment for clinical CVD risk factors, obesity or other types of physical activity generally attenuated but did not eliminate associations. Because functional status may be an important determinant of walking behaviour in adults, potential bias due to pre‐existing illness is of concern in all studies reviewed, particularly in case–control studies which ascertain walking retrospectively and yielded the strongest associations. Study findings were consistent with current physical activity recommendations, but there is a need for improvements in measurement of walking and other CVD risk factors, more thorough control for pre‐existing illness, examination of mediating or moderating conditions such as obesity and other analytical issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00533.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other prior reviews investigated only specific types of physical activity, included only women, or did not report stroke outcomes separately.

    “Other prior reviews have only investigated specific types of physical activity,22,23 include only women,24,25 or don’t report stroke outcomes separately.26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boone‐Heinonen, J., Evenson, K. R., Taber, D. R., & Gordon‐Larsen, P.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Boone‐Heinonen, J.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-23
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
204-217
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W2055112483
Cited by
96
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca012115-25)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA12115, R01CA121152, R01CA109831)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD044263, R01HD057194)
  • Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
walking, cardiovascular disease prevention, ischemic stroke, coronary artery disease, hemorrhagic stroke, physical activity, sedentary behavior, walking time, energy expenditure, walking speed, functional status, cardiovascular risk factors, obesity
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Research Design, Time Factors, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review