Cited by 24Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

Sprint interval running and continuous running produce training specific adaptations, despite a similar improvement of aerobic endurance capacity-a randomized trial of healthy adults.

Open access
Litleskare, Sigbjørn, Enoksen, Eystein, Sandvei, Marit, Støen, Line, Stensrud, Trine, Johansen, Egil, Jensen, Jørgen·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate training-specific adaptations to eight weeks of moderate intensity continuous training (CT) and sprint interval training (SIT). Young healthy subjects (n = 25; 9 males and 16 females) performed either continuous training (30–60 min, 70–80% peak heart rate) or sprint interval training (5–10 near maximal 30 s sprints, 3 min recovery) three times per week for eight weeks. Maximal oxygen consumption, 20 m shuttle run test and 5·60 m sprint test were performed before and after the intervention. Furthermore, heart rate, oxygen pulse, respiratory exchange ratio, lactate and running economy were assessed at five submaximal intensities, before and after the training interventions. Maximal oxygen uptake increased after CT (before: 47.9 ± 1.5; after: 49.7 ± 1.5 mL·kg−1·min−1, p < 0.05) and SIT (before: 50.5 ± 1.6; after: 53.3 ± 1.5 mL·kg−1·min−1, p < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between groups. Both groups increased 20 m shuttle run performance and 60 m sprint performance, but SIT performed better than CT at the 4th and 5th 60 m sprint after the intervention (p < 0.05). At submaximal intensities, CT, but not SIT, reduced heart rate (p < 0.05), whereas lactate decreased in both groups. In conclusion, both groups demonstrated similar improvements of several performance measures including VO2max, but sprint performance was better after SIT, and CT caused training-specific adaptations at submaximal intensities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17113865

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretically, the energy content in 1 kg of fat allows a person weighing 70 kg to run approximately 125 km.

    “Theoretically, the energy content in 1 kg of fat allows a person weighing 70 kg to run approximately 125 km (Frayn, 1983; Litleskare et al., 2020).”

    From Effect of Exercise Training on Fat Loss—Energetic Perspectives and the Role of Improved Adipose Tissue Function and Body Fat Distribution (2021) · cites this paper as Litleskare et al., 2020

    The Materials and Methods section (2.3, page not provided) defines running economy in terms of oxygen consumption, body mass and running speed, but does not estimate how far stored fat could fuel a run. Searches for the 1 kg, 70 kg and 125 km calculation and for fat oxidation or energy expenditure found no passage addressing that estimate. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It costs a person weighing 77 kg approximately 7,700 kcal to run 100 km, corresponding to the energy in 1 kg of fat.

    “Therefore, it costs a person weighing 77 kg approximately 7,700 kcal to run 100 km, corresponding to the energy in 1 kg of fat.”

    From Effect of Exercise Training on Fat Loss—Energetic Perspectives and the Role of Improved Adipose Tissue Function and Body Fat Distribution (2021) · cites this paper as Litleskare et al., 2020

    The Methods section (2.3, page unavailable) defines running economy using oxygen consumption, body mass, and running speed, but does not give a calorie cost for running 100 km. Searches for 77 kg, 7,700 kcal, and the energy equivalent of 1 kg of fat found no passage in our copy addressing those figures. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Litleskare, S., Enoksen, E., Sandvei, M., Støen, L., Stensrud, T., Johansen, E., & Jensen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Inland Norway (NO)
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Jørgen
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
3865
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030542893
Cited by
24
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
sprint interval training, continuous training, training specificity, cardiorespiratory fitness, VO2max, sprint performance, submaximal heart rate, lactate, running economy, respiratory exchange ratio, training effects
MeSH terms
High-Intensity Interval Training, Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Running, Exercise Tolerance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review