Cited by 31Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Self-Management Mobile Virtual Reality Program for Women with Gestational Diabetes

Open access
Kim, Sung-Hoon, Kim, Hye Jin, Shin, Gisoo·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The incidence of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes shows an increasing trend worldwide, and women diagnosed with gestational diabetes are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes within 5 years of delivery. This is closely related to lifestyle habits such as dietary intake and physical activity; hence, self-management should be continuously practiced. However, after childbirth, women find it challenging to practice self-management due to physical discomfort and child rearing. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an intervention program that is tailored to the characteristics of each participant and allows them to practice self-health management efficiently without time and space restrictions. This study aimed to develop a self-management mobile virtual reality program and investigate its efficacy in preventing type 2 diabetes after childbirth among women diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Intervention with the self-management mobile virtual reality program was performed for 12 weeks. The data of 57 participants in the experimental group and 62 participants in the control group were analyzed. After 12 weeks, the body weight, body fat, hemoglobin A1c, and fasting glucose were decreased in the experimental group compared with the control group. In addition, the dietary habits and health-promoting lifestyle profile were improved in the experimental group compared with the control group. These findings demonstrated that a self-managed mobile virtual reality program could be used as an intervention method for health promotion. To verify the effectiveness of intervention with the self-management mobile virtual reality program, a follow-up study with a larger number of research subjects should be conducted in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18041539

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim et al using virtual reality and Everett et al using AI interventions showed significant HbA1c reduction compared to the control group (P<.05).

    “such as significant HbA1c reduction compared to the control group in Kim et al [45] using virtual reality (VR) technology and Everett et al [46] using AI interventions (P<.05).”
  • Of 12 DCP studies assessing dysglycemia, 9 (75%) reported positive population health outcomes and 3 (25%) showed neutral effects.

    “Of the 12 studies (92.3%) assessing the effects of dysglycemia, 9 (75%) reported positive population health outcomes, such as significant HbA1c reduction compared to the control group in Kim et al [45] using virtual reality (VR) technology and Everett et al [46] using AI interventions (P<.05). Furthermore, 3 (25%) studies [40,44,47] showed the effect was neutral.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S.-H., Kim, H. J., & Shin, G.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Kyungsung University (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Shin, Gisoo
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-05
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
1539
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128301403
Cited by
31
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B4009560)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, mobile virtual reality, self-management, type 2 diabetes prevention, postpartum women, health promotion, dietary habits, health-promoting lifestyle, body weight, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, fat mass
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Virtual Reality, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review