Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long Covid-19: Proposed Primary Care Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Disease Management

Open access
Sisó-Almirall, Antoni, Brito-Zerón, Pilar, Conangla Ferrín, Laura, Kostov, Belchin, Moragas Moreno, Anna, Mestres, Jordi, Sellarès, Jaume, Galindo, Gisela, Morera, Ramon, Basora, Josep, Trilla, Antoni, Ramos-Casals, Manuel, on behalf of the CAMFiC long COVID-19 Study Group·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Long COVID-19 may be defined as patients who, four weeks after the diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 infection, continue to have signs and symptoms not explainable by other causes. The estimated frequency is around 10% and signs and symptoms may last for months. The main long-term manifestations observed in other coronaviruses (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)) are very similar to and have clear clinical parallels with SARS-CoV-2: mainly respiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric. The growing number of patients worldwide will have an impact on health systems. Therefore, the main objective of these clinical practice guidelines is to identify patients with signs and symptoms of long COVID-19 in primary care through a protocolized diagnostic process that studies possible etiologies and establishes an accurate differential diagnosis. The guidelines have been developed pragmatically by compiling the few studies published so far on long COVID-19, editorials and expert opinions, press releases, and the authors’ clinical experience. Patients with long COVID-19 should be managed using structured primary care visits based on the time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on the current limited evidence, disease management of long COVID-19 signs and symptoms will require a holistic, longitudinal follow up in primary care, multidisciplinary rehabilitation services, and the empowerment of affected patient groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18084350

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Sisó-Almirall, A., Brito-Zerón, P., Conangla Ferrín, L., Kostov, B., Moragas Moreno, A., Mestres, J., Sellarès, J., Galindo, G., Morera, R., Basora, J., Trilla, A., Ramos-Casals, M., & on behalf of the CAMFiC long COVID-19 Study Group
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
4350
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154746127
Cited by
206
References
12
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long Covid-19: Proposed Primary Care Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Disease Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph18084350
The paper
Sisó-Almirall, A., Brito-Zerón, P., Conangla Ferrín, L., Kostov, B., Moragas Moreno, A., Mestres, J., Sellarès, J., Galindo, G., Morera, R., Basora, J., Trilla, A., Ramos-Casals, M., & on behalf of the CAMFiC long COVID-19 Study Group. (2021). Long Covid-19: Proposed Primary Care Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Disease Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.