Cited by 195Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Food waste in a school nutrition program after implementation of new lunch program guidelines

Open access
Byker, Carmen J., Farris, Alisha R., Marcenelle, Michael, Davis, George C., Serrano, Elena L.·2014·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

Objective To assess the amount of food waste by meal components according to the new National School Lunch Program guidelines among pre-kindergarten and kindergarten students.Methods For 5 consecutive school days in 1 elementary school, the research team collected school lunch trays and separated meal components into bins relative to each food or beverage appearing on the school's daily menu. Bins were weighed in grams and converted to ounces and cups at the end of each lunch period.Results The researchers examined 304 meals from 1 pre-kindergarten class and 5 kindergarten classes. Of 4,988 oz of food and beverages served, 2,261 oz (45.3%) were wasted during 1 full school week, totaling 141 lb. The greatest amount of food waste was generated from vegetables, the main entree, and milk, respectively.Conclusions and implications Strategies to reduce food waste in school lunch should be researched and implemented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.009

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At one elementary school after the implementation of the policy, 45 percent of served food and beverages were discarded by students.

    “At one elementary school after the implementation of the policy 45 percent of served food and beverages were discarded by students (Byker et al. 2014).”

    From Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development (2016) · cites this paper as Byker et al. 2014

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byker, C. J., Farris, A. R., Marcenelle, M., Davis, G. C., & Serrano, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Montgomery County Public Schools (US)
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
406-411
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035951612
Cited by
195
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
food waste, school meals, elementary school students, kindergarten children, food waste reduction, school nutrition programs
MeSH terms
Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Food Preferences, Food Services, Humans, Menu Planning, Schools, Lunch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review