Cited by 9COVID-19 and Mental HealthLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Social impacts of COVID-19

How Has COVID-19 Affected Mental Health and Lifestyle Behaviors after 2 Years? The Third Step of a Longitudinal Study of Italian Citizens

Open access
Mazza, Cristina, Ricci, Eleonora, Colasanti, Marco, Cardinale, Alessandra, Bosco, Francesca, Biondi, Silvia, Tambelli, Renata, Di Domenico, Alberto +2 more·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and its protective measures had a tremendous effect on the general population’s mental health and deeply affected their lifestyle. The present study carried out a longitudinal analysis to evaluate the long-lasting psychological effects of the pandemic and its impact on the general population’s day-to-day routine. Three points in time were considered: the initial period of the lockdown (T1; n = 2766; March 2020), the final period of the lockdown (T2; n = 439; May 2020) and two years after the lockdown (T3; n = 268; July 2022). Frequency analyses were carried out to examine which behavioral changes were maintained following the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown; furthermore, a repeated measures ANOVA test was run to measure differences in depression, stress, and anxiety levels between the three periods considered; lastly, multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses were carried out to examine which variables were associated with psychological distress more than two years after the lockdown. The results highlighted that depression at T3 was associated with depression at T2 and negative affect, whereas stress at T3 was associated with stress at T2 and detachment. The psychological effects and lifestyle changes are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20010759

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Underwood D. Kim H. Matier M. To mail or to Web: Comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics Proceedings of the 40th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research Cincinnati, OH, USA 21–24 May 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazza, C., Ricci, E., Colasanti, M., Cardinale, A., Bosco, F., Biondi, S., Tambelli, R., Di Domenico, A., Verrocchio, M. C., & Roma, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
Corresponding author
Mazza, Cristina
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-31
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
759
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313471850
Cited by
9
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Sapienza University of Rome (RM12117A8AB41216)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, mental health, lifestyle habits, depression, stress, anxiety, psychological distress, long-term psychological effects, behavior change, Italian citizens
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Communicable Disease Control, Depression, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Health, Stress, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review