Cited by 1,294Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys

Sax, Linda J., Gilmartin, Shannon K., Bryant, Alyssa N.·2003·Research in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024232915870

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sax, Linda J.
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Published
2003-08
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
409-432
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
OpenAlex
W2130835641
Cited by
1,294
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
FWCI
42.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
response rate, nonresponse bias, online surveys, paper surveys, survey mode, predictors of treatment response, online survey research, first-year college students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review