Cited by 1Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and Education

Mobilizing for Health: A Case Study of Kazakhstan’s Vaping Ban Advocacy Campaign

Open access
Sadykova, Jamilya, Ayaganova, Akerke, Yergaliyev, Kuanysh A.·2025·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This article focuses on an advocacy campaign for a complete ban on vaping in Kazakhstan led by the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition. Initiated in 2021, the campaign aimed to address the growing public health concerns about vaping among adolescents, which was reflected in a sharp increase in vape use among young people—from 1.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2022. Despite facing strong opposition from the vaping industry and political lobbyists, the Coalition gained support from key political figures, public health leaders, and NGOs. Over 32 months, the campaign achieved several key milestones, including the inclusion of criminal liabilities for those involved in the vaping industry, and, in 2024, it eventually joined a number of countries such as Thailand, Qatar, Japan, Singapore, and India in approving a vaping ban. The advocacy efforts relied on public engagement, social media, and coordinated civil society mobilization—including petitions, public meetings, awareness campaigns, and coalition-building among NGOs and health advocacy groups—to overcome industry resistance toward official vaping market ban approvals. This article uses the case study approach with the Power Prism framework to describe and evaluate the advocacy campaign’s strategic plan, its political challenges, and the significant impact of public health advocacy in shaping national health policy. The significance of the article lies in the success of the vaping ban in the Kazakhstani context, which may serve as a model for other countries facing similar public health issues, political instability, and industry resistance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This case study describes how Kazakhstan’s Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition led a 32-month advocacy campaign that resulted in a comprehensive vaping ban signed into law in April 2024. Using the Power Prism framework retrospectively, the authors analyze the coalition’s data-driven messaging, grassroots mobilization, media advocacy, and decision-maker engagement against vaping-industry opposition.

Key findings

  • Adolescent vaping rose sharply while cigarette smoking declined: vape use among 13–15-year-olds increased from 1.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2022, and national data for 15–17-year-olds showed vape use at 12.5% in 2023, compared with 2% regular cigarette use.
  • The Coalition documented rapid market growth: imported vape units rose from 21,608 in 2020 to 6,301,623 by early 2022, with the ESP/vape market growing nearly 300% between 2020 and early 2022; vape sales in Astana and Almaty increased by 372% in the first six months of 2022 alone.
  • A Ministry of Health investigation found nicotine concentrations up to 67.6 mg/cm³ per vape liquid unit, nearly 68 times the permitted limit of 1 mg/cm³ and much higher than an average cigarette’s 0.7–0.9 mg.
  • A parents’ online petition gathered over 21,000 authentic signatures, while the vaping industry’s counterpetition claiming more than 100,000 signatures was exposed as fabricated; the campaign ended with the President signing amendments in April 2024 banning flavored vaping products and liquids, with criminal and administrative penalties.

Methods

  • Case study design examining the advocacy campaign for a comprehensive vaping ban in Kazakhstan.
  • Data sources included official government reports, parliamentary meetings, public petitions, media articles, personal experience of coalition members, coalition meeting minutes, and relevant research studies.
  • Data were analyzed, synthesized, and organized using the Power Prism framework, which was applied as a post-campaign analytical lens rather than during campaign implementation.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the campaign lacked systematic fundraising and financial planning; while the Ministry of Health provided basic support, the lack of diversified financial resources limited outreach, especially broader media engagement.
  • The paper states that deeper analysis of political dynamics and bureaucratic processes was needed, and that the absence of a guiding framework at the outset limited initial coordination and efficiency, causing confusion about sequencing and responsibilities.
  • The text makes evident that Figure 1 data come from different studies, limiting direct comparability; market-related data access was challenging due to lack of cooperation from relevant authorities; and the Power Prism framework was not directly applied during the campaign that led to the ban.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph22071102

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

20 of 70 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    A 2021 study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University revealed that vaping aerosols contain nearly 2000 distinct chemicals.

    “Evidence-based international data, such as a 2021 study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University revealing that vaping aerosols contain nearly 2000 distinct chemicals”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Tehrani, 2021, Characterizing the chemical landscape in commercial e-cigarette liquids and aerosols by liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry, Chem. Res. Toxicol. source

      The Results and Discussion section reports compounds detected in e-cigarette aerosols and says the count increased after vaping for most products. The passages available from our copy do not give a count of nearly 2,000 distinct chemicals, so that numerical part of the claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Several studies indicate that the dual consumption trend is contributing to an increase in cigarette smoking among young people.

    “Several studies have indicated that this trend is contributing to an increase in cigarette smoking among young people [13,14,15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] Mantey, 2017, E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated with E-Cigarette Use among U.S. Youth, J. Adolesc. Health source

      The Introduction (page not provided) reports a link between adolescent e-cigarette use and conventional cigarette use, and says e-cigarette use may precede combustible tobacco use. It does not establish that dual consumption is causing an increase in cigarette smoking among young people. The Discussion (page not provided) also cautions that this study’s cross-sectional analyses cannot support causal inference. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Smith, 2023, Youth’s Exposure to and Engagement with E-Cigarette Marketing on Social Media: A UK Focus Group Study, BMJ Open source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) defines dual-users as people who use both cigarettes and e-cigarettes, but says they are understudied. The Discussion and Conclusion address e-cigarette marketing and youth vaping; no passage found says dual use is contributing to increased cigarette smoking among young people (searched for dual use and smoking increases). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Le, 2020, Exposure to E-Cigarette Advertising and Its Association with E-Cigarette Use among Youth and Adolescents in Two Largest Cities in Vietnam, Tob. Use Insights

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    The proportion of adolescents in Kazakhstan who use vapes nearly tripled between 2014 and 2023.

    “According to these studies, the proportion of adolescents in the country who use vapes has nearly tripled between 2014 and 2023 [4,5,6,7,8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [4] (2025, March 12). Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2014 Kazakhstan. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/516.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) (2019). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Republic of Kazakhstan, GATS.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] National Center for Public Health (2025, March 12). National Report on the Health and Well-Being of Children and Adolescents in Kazakhstan 2018. Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/HBSC-Kazakhstan-report-2018.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Glushkova, N., Smailova, D., Namazbayeva, Z., Mukasheva, G., Zhamakurova, A., Kuanyshkalieva, A., Karibayeva, I.K., Kauysheva, A., Otyzbayeva, N., and Kulzhanov, M. (2023). Prevalence of Smoking Various Tobacco Types in the Kazakhstani Adult Population in 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20. source

      The Discussion reports 2014 smoking rates for adolescents, but does not identify those rates as vaping rates. Its mention of vaping concerns a possible explanation for increased tobacco use among adult women; the paper provides no 2023 adolescent vaping rate or 2014–2023 comparison (searched for adolescent vaping and a threefold increase). (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] Marquez, P.V., Krasovsky, K., and Andreeva, T. (2023, January 02). Kazakhstan: Overview of Tobacco Use, Tobacco Control Legislation, and Taxation. World Bank Group Global Tobacco Control Program. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/603221560808566535.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The adolescent vaping trend in Kazakhstan can be inferred from combining data from different surveys with different age ranges and methods, despite limited direct comparability.
  • Premisecitation

    Vaping is linked to serious health conditions such as EVALI, a severe respiratory illness responsible for multiple deaths globally.

    “It was crucial to emphasize the link between vaping and serious health conditions, such as EVALI, a severe respiratory illness responsible for multiple deaths globally [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Tehrani, 2021, Characterizing the chemical landscape in commercial e-cigarette liquids and aerosols by liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry, Chem. Res. Toxicol. source

      The Introduction identifies the 2019 EVALI outbreak as an example of health effects associated with vaping, and the Abstract links compounds in inhalable aerosols to severe respiratory effects. Neither passage reports deaths or establishes that EVALI caused multiple deaths globally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Vape use among young people in Kazakhstan increased from 1.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2022.

    “which was reflected in a sharp increase in vape use among young people—from 1.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2022.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [4] (2025, March 12). Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2014 Kazakhstan. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/516.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) (2019). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Republic of Kazakhstan, GATS.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] National Center for Public Health (2025, March 12). National Report on the Health and Well-Being of Children and Adolescents in Kazakhstan 2018. Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/HBSC-Kazakhstan-report-2018.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Glushkova, N., Smailova, D., Namazbayeva, Z., Mukasheva, G., Zhamakurova, A., Kuanyshkalieva, A., Karibayeva, I.K., Kauysheva, A., Otyzbayeva, N., and Kulzhanov, M. (2023). Prevalence of Smoking Various Tobacco Types in the Kazakhstani Adult Population in 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20. source

      The Discussion mentions the possible growing popularity of vaping devices among women and reports 2014 adolescent smoking figures, but neither passage gives youth vaping rates. Searches for 1.6%, 5.8%, and 2022 youth vaping found no passage documenting the claimed increase. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] Marquez, P.V., Krasovsky, K., and Andreeva, T. (2023, January 02). Kazakhstan: Overview of Tobacco Use, Tobacco Control Legislation, and Taxation. World Bank Group Global Tobacco Control Program. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/603221560808566535.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The adolescent vaping trend in Kazakhstan can be inferred from combining data from different surveys with different age ranges and methods, despite limited direct comparability.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims. 53
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Power Prism framework was chosen for its structured approach and unique ability to organize and explain the advocacy campaign clearly.

    “The Power Prism framework was chosen for its structured approach and unique ability to organize and explain the advocacy campaign clearly [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Yergaliyev, 2025, Power Prism Framework for Health Advocacy: A Case of Dietary Supplements for Weight Loss and Muscle Building Sold to Youth in Massachusetts Municipalities, Electron. J. Gen. Med. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By 2023, national data for older adolescents (15-17 years) showed regular cigarette use dropped to 2% and vape usage surged to 12.5%.

    “By 2023, national data for older adolescents (15–17 years) revealed a dramatic change. Regular cigarette use had dropped to 2%, marking the lowest rate in the observed period. In contrast, vape usage had surged to 12.5%”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] Glushkova, N., Smailova, D., Namazbayeva, Z., Mukasheva, G., Zhamakurova, A., Kuanyshkalieva, A., Karibayeva, I.K., Kauysheva, A., Otyzbayeva, N., and Kulzhanov, M. (2023). Prevalence of Smoking Various Tobacco Types in the Kazakhstani Adult Population in 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20. source

      The Discussion reports a 2014 survey of adolescents aged 13–15, not 2023 data for those aged 15–17. Searches for the claimed 2% regular cigarette use and 12.5% vape use found neither figure for that population in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] Marquez, P.V., Krasovsky, K., and Andreeva, T. (2023, January 02). Kazakhstan: Overview of Tobacco Use, Tobacco Control Legislation, and Taxation. World Bank Group Global Tobacco Control Program. Available online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/603221560808566535.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The growing use of electronic cigarettes has become widely acknowledged as a global public health concern.

    “The growing use of electronic cigarettes (commonly referred to as e-cigarettes, e-cigs, or vaping products) has become widely acknowledged as a global public health concern [1,2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Besaratinia, 2019, Vaping: A Growing Global Health Concern, eClinicalMedicine source
    • cites [2] Jones, 2020, The Vaping Epidemic in Adolescents, Mo. Med.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The widespread availability of marketing for flavored electronic cigarettes has fueled an epidemic of vaping and led to dual consumption of cigarettes and vapes among adolescents.

    “The widespread availability of marketing for flavored electronic cigarettes has fueled an epidemic of vaping, which has also led to a troubling trend of dual consumption—both cigarettes and vapes—among adolescents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] Mantey, 2017, E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated with E-Cigarette Use among U.S. Youth, J. Adolesc. Health source

      The Discussion reports that exposure to e-cigarette marketing is associated with adolescent e-cigarette use, and the Introduction describes a sharp rise in youth use. The paper does not establish that marketing caused that rise: its Discussion says the cross-sectional analysis prohibits causal inference. The cited passages do not specifically address flavored e-cigarette marketing or show that marketing led to dual use of cigarettes and vapes. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Smith, 2023, Youth’s Exposure to and Engagement with E-Cigarette Marketing on Social Media: A UK Focus Group Study, BMJ Open source

      The Introduction (page not provided) links e-cigarette marketing to increased vaping among youths, and the Results describe sweet and fruity flavours as appealing to them. But the paper does not establish that this marketing fueled an epidemic or caused adolescents to use both cigarettes and vapes; it identifies dual-users as an understudied group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Le, 2020, Exposure to E-Cigarette Advertising and Its Association with E-Cigarette Use among Youth and Adolescents in Two Largest Cities in Vietnam, Tob. Use Insights

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heating VEA in vape aerosols produces the toxic gas ketene, which can damage the lungs.

    “Wu & O’Shea et al. [20] also demonstrated that heating VEA in vape aerosols produces the toxic gas ketene, which can damage the lungs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Blount, 2020, Vitamin E Acetate in Bronchoalveolar-Lavage Fluid Associated with EVALI, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. source

      The Discussion says heating vitamin E acetate in e-cigarette products may create ketene and that ketene could irritate the lungs, depending on its concentration. It does not demonstrate ketene production or lung damage; it cites Wu and O’Shea for the proposed mechanism, and says research on generated aerosols and gases is ongoing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Not all vapes contain Vitamin E acetate (VEA), but VEA has been commonly found in illicit THC vape products and is strongly linked to EVALI due to its toxic effects when inhaled.

    “Despite the fact that not all vapes contain Vitamin E acetate (VEA), it has been commonly found in illicit THC vape products and is strongly linked to EVALI due to its toxic effects when inhaled [18,19,20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Muthumalage, T., Friedman, M.R., McGraw, M.D., Ginsberg, G., Friedman, A.E., and Rahman, I. (2020). Chemical Constituents Involved in E-Cigarette, or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI). Toxics, 8. source

      The Introduction identifies VEA as a cutting agent in counterfeit street cartridges, and the Discussion reports finding it in many, but not all, EVALI-associated e-liquids. The Discussion also says VEA is the agent most consistently linked to EVALI cases. However, the Introduction explicitly says VEA inhalation is not a proven cause of lung damage, so the claim that the link is due to its toxic effects when inhaled goes beyond this paper's evidence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Wu, 2020, Potential for Release of Pulmonary Toxic Ketene from Vaping Pyrolysis of Vitamin E Acetate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) says VEA is added to some vape mixtures, especially those containing THC, and reports its detection in lung-fluid samples from 48 of 51 patients with vaping-associated injury. It does not establish that VEA is commonly found specifically in illicit THC products. The Abstract identifies VEA only as a possible cause, while the Experimental Analysis (page unavailable) says the direct relevance of its toxic pyrolysis products to lung injury remains uncertain; the claim's causal wording is therefore too strong. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Blount, 2020, Vitamin E Acetate in Bronchoalveolar-Lavage Fluid Associated with EVALI, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. source

      The Results report vitamin E acetate in BAL fluid from 48 of 51 patients with EVALI, and the Discussion describes its common use in illicit THC products and its absence from 197 analyzed nicotine products. However, the Discussion calls lung-injury mechanisms possible and says further studies are needed to determine whether inhaled vitamin E acetate itself causes injury. The claim overstates that uncertainty by saying the link is due to its toxic effects when inhaled. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    VEA and vaping oils disrupt lung surfactants.

    “while a 2020 MDPI review and a report of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describe how VEA and vaping oils disrupt lung surfactants [18,21,22].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Muthumalage, T., Friedman, M.R., McGraw, M.D., Ginsberg, G., Friedman, A.E., and Rahman, I. (2020). Chemical Constituents Involved in E-Cigarette, or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI). Toxics, 8. source

      The Discussion says hydrocarbon solvents found in vaping cartridges may alter lung surfactant production and function, which supports part of the claim. It does not say that VEA or vaping oils themselves disrupt surfactants; the Introduction also cautions that VEA inhalation is not a proven cause of lung damage. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] Strongin, 2020, Toxic Ketene Gas Forms on Vaping Vitamin E Acetate Prompting Interest in Its Possible Role in the EVALI Outbreak, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source

      Strongin’s discussion (pp. 7553–7554) addresses VEA’s association with EVALI and the possibility that vaping VEA produces toxic ketene. A search for lung surfactant disruption found no passage in our copy addressing whether VEA or vaping oils disrupt surfactants. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2025, March 12). Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products, Available online: https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The application of the Power Prism framework as a post-campaign analytical lens was instrumental in understanding and clearly communicating the strategies and outcomes of the Coalition.

    “The application of the Power Prism framework as a post-campaign analytical lens was instrumental in understanding and clearly communicating the strategies and outcomes of the Coalition [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Yergaliyev, 2025, Power Prism Framework for Health Advocacy: A Case of Dietary Supplements for Weight Loss and Muscle Building Sold to Youth in Massachusetts Municipalities, Electron. J. Gen. Med. source

      The ‘Guiding Theoretical Framework and Analysis’ section says the paper structured its thematic analysis around Power Prism tools to provide insight into advocacy strategy. The Abstract, however, describes the framework as a strategy-design tool; our copy does not establish that it was instrumental as a post-campaign lens for understanding and communicating the Coalition’s outcomes. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early initiation into vaping increases the risk of lifelong nicotine dependence, which is associated with respiratory illnesses including EVALI, cardiovascular disease, and other non-communicable conditions.

    “The campaign stressed that early initiation into vaping increases the risk of lifelong nicotine dependence, which is associated with respiratory illnesses (including EVALI), cardiovascular disease, and other non-communicable conditions [25,26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] Gotts, 2019, What Are the Respiratory Effects of E-Cigarettes?, BMJ source

      The Human studies > Population studies section reports acute lung injury associated with vaping, and Toxicity of specific aerosol components > Nicotine suggests that nicotine delivered by e-cigarettes may be a cardiovascular risk factor. The paper also discusses nicotine dependence and youth vaping, but does not establish that early initiation causes lifelong dependence or that nicotine dependence itself is associated with the reported lung injuries. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] Layden, 2020, Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin—Final Report, N. Engl. J. Med. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Since October 2021, the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition had been spearheading an advocacy campaign aimed at achieving a complete ban on vaping products, including flavorings and liquids.

    “Since October 2021, the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition (the Coalition) had been spearheading an advocacy campaign aimed at achieving a complete ban on vaping products, including flavorings and liquids.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By 2018, HBSC data showed 5% of 11-15-year-olds smoked cigarettes and 3.1% used vapes.

    “By 2018, data from the HBSC study showed an increase in both categories among 11 to 15-year-olds, with 5% smoking cigarettes and 3.1% using vapes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] (2025, July 12). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In 2022, cigarette use among adolescents declined to 4.1%, while vape use increased to 5.8%.

    “However, in 2022, the trend began to shift. While cigarette use slightly declined to 4.1%, vape use saw a sharp increase to 5.8%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] (2025, July 12). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Vaping experience rose by 2.9% among boys (from 8.4% to 11.3%), while among girls it more than doubled from 3.8% to 8.2%.

    “In contrast, vaping experience rose by 2.9% among boys (from 8.4% to 11.3%), whereas the increase among girls was more pronounced, more than doubling from 3.8% to 8.2%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] (2025, July 12). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The campaign was rooted in data showing the toxic effects of vaping and its increasing popularity among school-aged children.

    “This effort is rooted in data showing the toxic effects of vaping and its increasing popularity among school-aged children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 2024, Kazakhstan approved a vaping ban, joining countries such as Thailand, Qatar, Japan, Singapore, and India.

    “in 2024, it eventually joined a number of countries such as Thailand, Qatar, Japan, Singapore, and India in approving a vaping ban.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The campaign worked to combat the influence of the vaping industry and its lobbying efforts.

    “The campaign not only focused on public health concerns but also worked to combat the influence of the vaping industry and its lobbying efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The vaping industry’s opposition to the ban was motivated by financial interest rather than public health.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    The Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition led an advocacy campaign for a complete ban on vaping in Kazakhstan initiated in 2021.

    “This article focuses on an advocacy campaign for a complete ban on vaping in Kazakhstan led by the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The advocacy efforts relied on public engagement, social media, and coordinated civil society mobilization including petitions, public meetings, awareness campaigns, and coalition-building among NGOs and health advocacy groups to overcome industry resistance.

    “The advocacy efforts relied on public engagement, social media, and coordinated civil society mobilization—including petitions, public meetings, awareness campaigns, and coalition-building among NGOs and health advocacy groups—to overcome industry resistance toward official vaping market ban approvals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The number of e-cigarette users increased threefold among boys from 2% in 2014 to 6% in 2018 and twofold among girls from 1.1% to 2%.

    “The number of e-cigarette users increased threefold among boys—from 2% in 2014 to 6% in 2018—and twofold among girls—from 1.1% to 2%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] (2025, March 12). Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2014. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/873/study-description.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The campaign advocated for the ban due to significant emerging health issues among young people and the rapid rise of a vaping epidemic among them.

    “Secondly, the campaign advocated for this ban due to significant emerging health issues among young people and the rapid rise of a vaping epidemic among them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In 2014, according to the GYTS, 3.2% of adolescents aged 13-15 were current cigarette users, while 1.6% used vapes.

    “in 2014, according to the GYTS, 3.2% of adolescents aged 13–15 were current cigarette users, while only 1.6% used vapes [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] (2025, March 12). Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2014. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/873/study-description.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Key political figures at the government and parliamentary levels, along with the Minister of Health, served as the primary decision-makers with authority to implement the full vaping ban.

    “Thirdly, key political figures at the government and parliamentary levels, along with the Minister of Health (MoH), served as the primary decision-makers who had the authority to implement the full vaping ban.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Between 2018 and 2022, both current cigarette and vape use among boys and girls in Kazakhstan tended to increase, but the magnitude of increase was significantly greater for vaping.

    “Figure 2 shows that, according to the HBSC 2018 and 2022 reports, between 2018 and 2022, both current cigarette and vape use among boys and girls tended to increase in Kazakhstan, but the magnitude of increase was significantly greater for vaping [11,12].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] (2025, July 12). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Cigarette smoking experience among boys increased by 1.5% (from 5.9% to 7.4%), and among girls by 0.9% (from 3.7% to 4.6%).

    “Cigarette smoking experience among boys increased by 1.5% (from 5.9% to 7.4%), and it increased by 0.9% for girls (from 3.7% to 4.6%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] (2025, June 29). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dZMsQ17y3zmsCqT6uPcOixqVqngCHJ9g/view.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] (2025, July 12). National Report on Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC). Available online: https://hls.kz/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/%D0%9E%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B-%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The campaign primarily aimed to achieve a full vaping ban in Kazakhstan, including criminal liability for the import and sale of vapes.

    “the campaign primarily aimed to achieve a full vaping ban in Kazakhstan, including criminal liability for the import and sale of vapes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In 2020, the Coalition successfully advocated for the passage of Article 110 Tobacco Control of the Healthcare Act, which forced strict regulations including a ban on display of all tobacco products at points of sale, a complete ban on the smokeless tobacco market, and treatment of new tobacco products as cigarettes with a ban in public places.

    “In 2020, the Coalition successfully advocated for the passage of Article 110 Tobacco Control of the Healthcare Act, which forced the implementation of strict regulations such as a ban on the display of all tobacco products at all points of sale, a complete ban on the smokeless tobacco market, and the treatment of new tobacco products (HTPs, vapes, hookah) as cigarettes with a ban in public places,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] (2025, July 04). Healthcare Act of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K2000000360.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In summer 2022, Dr. Zarina Kamassova left parliament due to parliamentary elections and membership renewal, which was a significant challenge for the Coalition; Dr. Guldara Nurumova was appointed as the new head of the parliamentary working group and momentum continued.

    “However, in the summer of 2022, the Coalition faced a significant challenge when one of its strongest advocates, Dr. Zarina Kamassova, left parliament due to parliamentary elections and membership renewal.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.7. The Key Milestones of the Campaign · plain
      “Following her departure, Dr. Guldara Nurumova was appointed as the new head of the parliamentary working group and quickly became actively and enthusiastically involved in advancing campaign efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Coalition initiated 65% pictorial health warnings for HTPs and hookahs and a 3-4× increase in fines for all tobacco-related violations.

    “The coalition also initiated 65% pictorial health warnings for HTPs and hookahs and a 3–4× increase in fines for all tobacco-related violations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Analysis of the petitions and accompanying comments revealed that they had been artificially generated, with multiple comments authored by the same individuals and falsified voting figures.

    “Analysis of the petitions and accompanying comments revealed that they had been artificially generated, with multiple comments authored by the same individuals and falsified voting figures [34,35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] National Coalition for a Smoke-Free Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). On the Fake Vape-Industry Petition—Response Press Release of the National Coalition “For Kazakhstan—Free from Tobacco Smoke”. Vredno.kz. (In Russian).

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] National Coalition for a Smoke-Free Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). Vapes Don’t Just Have Artificial Flavors but Also Fake Support. Vredno.kz. (In Russian).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Four-hour debates at which the Coalition effectively opposed every industry argument subsequently resulted in MNE approval of the RRA and the document being forwarded to the governmental committee for final review.

    “Four-hour debates at which the Coalition effectively opposed every industry argument subsequently resulted in MNE approval of the RRA and the document being forwarded to the governmental committee for final review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The main political ally of the Coalition was the MoH of Kazakhstan, which had a complete vaping ban at every level of political decision-making.

    “The main political ally of the Coalition was the MoH of Kazakhstan, which had a complete vaping ban at every level of political decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One key gap was the absence of systematic fundraising and financial planning; the lack of diversified financial resources limited outreach efforts, particularly in broader media engagement.

    “One key gap was the absence of systematic fundraising and financial planning. While the Ministry of Health provided basic support, the lack of diversified financial resources limited outreach efforts, particularly in broader media engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The legislation included a complete market ban on flavored vaping products and vaping liquids, along with clear provisions for criminal and administrative penalties, marking a significant milestone in Kazakhstan's public health policy.

    “This legislation included a complete market (import, production, sale, export) ban on flavored vaping products and vaping liquids, along with clear provisions for criminal and administrative penalties, marking a significant milestone in Kazakhstan’s public health policy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The approval process of a revised RRA application to the MNE was highly influenced by the vaping industry, and the online public hearing on it proved highly challenging for Coalition members because of significant opposition from industry-aligned groups.

    “At the center of this phase was the approval process of a revised RRA application to the MNE which was highly influenced by the vaping industry.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.7. The Key Milestones of the Campaign · plain
      “However, this hearing proved highly challenging for Coalition members because of significant opposition from industry-aligned groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Coalition and Majilis champions successfully engaged key political parties Respublika and Amanat, increasing the number of supportive members of parliament to 18.

    “In addition, the Coalition and Majilis champions successfully engaged key political parties, “Respublika” and “Amanat,” thereby increasing the number of supportive members of parliament to 18, which significantly increased political pressure and impacted the discussion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The leading organization in the vape-banning initiative was the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition, which successfully engaged multiple stakeholders in the advocacy campaign.

    “In this vape-banning initiative, the leading organization was the “Smokefree Kazakhstan” Coalition, which successfully engaged multiple stakeholders in the advocacy campaign.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Advocates pointed to environmental harms of vapes such as plastic and battery waste and aerosol emissions, framing the ban as a safeguard for youth health and the broader ecosystem.

    “Finally, advocates pointed to the environmental harms of vapes—such as plastic and battery waste and aerosol emissions—further framing the ban as a safeguard for both youth health and the broader ecosystem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Coalition members identified the differences between a full ban and partial ban, the gap between a smoking ban and a market ban, loopholes in the law, and the true reasons for poor enforcement that need to be addressed when implementing a vaping ban.

    “However, the Coalition members identified the differences between a full ban and partial ban, the gap between a smoking ban and a market ban, loopholes in the law, and the true reasons for poor enforcement that need to be addressed when implementing a vaping ban.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A group of MPs openly supported the vaping industry and sought to intervene during Majilis discussions; this opposition primarily consisted of influential Majilis members linked to the business community, including some prominent billionaires.

    “However, not all ministries and political parties endorsed the campaign. A group of members of parliament openly supported the vaping industry and sought to intervene during discussions within the Majilis. This opposition primarily consisted of influential Majilis members linked to the business community, including some prominent billionaires.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Pro-vaping members of parliament worked to delay the passage of RRA by the government and soften penalties related to the ban.

    “These pro-vaping members of parliament have worked to delay the passage of RRA by the government and soften penalties related to the ban.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In response to the hearing, 12 NGOs and two independent experts submitted formal protest letters to the Minister of National Economy, demanding a higher-level review of the RRA and fair offline discussion; following these protests, the Coalition secured a crucial in-person debate where they successfully advocated for including criminal liability measures.

    “In response, 12 NGOs and two independent experts submitted formal protest letters to the Minister of National Economy, demanding a higher-level review of the RRA and fair offline discussion.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.7. The Key Milestones of the Campaign · plain
      “Following these protests, the Coalition secured a crucial in-person debate with pro-tobacco experts under moderation of the First Vice-Minister of the MNE, where they successfully advocated for including criminal liability measures against vape market operators as part of the comprehensive ban.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    According to GATS, adults primarily cited pleasant aromas (75.6%), the belief that vaping is less harmful than tobacco smoking (72.7%), and enjoyment (68.3%) as reasons for using vapes.

    “According to this study, adults primarily cited pleasant aromas (75.6%), the belief that vaping is less harmful than tobacco smoking (72.7%), and enjoyment (68.3%) as reasons for using vapes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) (2019). Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Republic of Kazakhstan, GATS.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Coalition was established in 2005 by public health leaders and 25 medical, governmental, and non-governmental organizations with the mission to strengthen public health and advance tobacco control.

    “The Coalition was established in 2005 by public health leaders (Akanov A, Izmukhambetov I, Sadykova J) and 25 medical, governmental, and non-governmental organizations with the mission to strengthen public health and advance tobacco control by uniting the efforts of civil society around shared interests [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] National Coalition for a Smoke-Free Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). About the National Coalition “For Kazakhstan Free from Tobacco Smoke”. Nosmoke.kz. Available online: http://nosmoke.kz/index.php?do=cat&category=about_new/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The primary funding for the campaign was provided by the MoH of Kazakhstan, which helped ensure its independence and credibility.

    “The primary funding for the campaign was provided by the MoH of Kazakhstan, which helped ensure its independence and credibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    As of 2025, the vaping ban is in effect, and the Coalition continues to play a vital role in monitoring its enforcement.

    “As of 2025, the vaping ban is in effect, and the Coalition continues to play a vital role in monitoring its enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    On 24 January 2024, the plenary session of the Majilis approved the Healthcare Law amendment, introducing a comprehensive ban on vaping products in Kazakhstan, including all flavored liquids, and establishing criminal and administrative liabilities for violations.

    “Finally, on 24 January 2024, the plenary session of the Majilis, the lower chamber of parliament, approved the Healthcare Law amendment, introducing a comprehensive ban on vaping products in Kazakhstan, including all flavored liquids, and establishing criminal and administrative liabilities for violations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Coalition did not spend any financial resources on media advocacy and made great use of free social media and other available platforms to increase public and political attention.

    “The Coalition did not spend any financial resources on media advocacy and made great use of free social media and other available platforms to increase public and political attention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A targeted investigation by the MoH revealed nicotine concentrations up to 67.6 mg/cm3 per vape liquid unit, nearly 68 times greater than the permitted nicotine limit for vapes (1 mg/cm3) and significantly higher than the nicotine content in an average cigarette (0.7-0.9 mg).

    “This investigation revealed alarmingly high nicotine concentrations—up to 67.6 mg/cm3 per vape liquid unit, nearly 68 times greater than the permitted nicotine limit for vapes (1 mg/cm3) and significantly higher than the nicotine content in an average cigarette (0.7–0.9 mg) according to the MoH Order from 15 December 2020 [27,29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] Liga Potrebitelei Kazakhstana (2022, January 15). Kruglyi stol, posviashchennyi problemam zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniia odnorazovykh veipov i sistemnym narusheniiam tekushchego regulirovaniia. Proceedings of the Roundtable on the Problems of Legislative Regulation of Disposable Vapes and Systemic Violations of the Current Regulation, online.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Republic of Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). On Establishing Maximum Permissible Levels of Nicotine and Tar in Smokable Tobacco Products, Including Heat-Not-Burn Systems (Order No. V2000021815). Adilet Legal Information System. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000021815.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In October 2023, another influential group from the WHO, Union of Lawyers, Police Department, MoH, Mothers' Council, and National Coalition discussed loopholes in the law via the example of hookahs, which were manipulated by the vaping industry to overturn amendments to the law.

    “In October 2023, on the same platform, another influential group of representatives from various fields, such as the Kazakhstan Representative Office of the World Health Organization, the Union of Lawyers, the Police Department, the MoH, the Mothers’ Council, and the National Coalition, discussed loopholes in the law via the example of hookahs, which were manipulated by the vaping industry to over”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] CCSb (2025, March 12). Expert Round Table “Hookah Collisions”. Available online: https://ortcom.kz/ru/video/1697804771.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Following the Majilis approval, the Senate endorsed the amended Healthcare Law and submitted it to the President of Kazakhstan.

    “Following the Majilis approval, the upper chamber of parliament—the Senate—endorsed the amended Healthcare Law and submitted it to the President of Kazakhstan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Increasing numbers of parents reported frustration over the state's perceived inaction in regulating vape products.

    “The protection argument also resonated with societal concerns, as increasing numbers of parents reported frustration over the state’s perceived inaction in regulating vape products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The tobacco industry attempted to exclude provisions on criminal liability from the RRA through internal debates, but the clause was ultimately reinstated during the September 2022 government review following the personal intervention of Prime Minister Alikhan Smailov.

    “However, later, the tobacco industry attempted to exclude provisions on criminal liability from the RRA through internal debates, reportedly influenced by the Deputy Prime Minister, who selectively interpreted an official position from the Ministry of Justice to support this position [38].”
    • Also stated in: § 3.7. The Key Milestones of the Campaign · plain
      “However, the clause was ultimately reinstated during the September 2022 government review, following the personal intervention of Prime Minister Alikhan Smailov.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). Decree on the Signing of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Amendments and Additions to Certain Legislative Acts on Healthcare Issues. Akorda.kz. (In Russian).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The primary sources of data included official government reports, parliamentary meetings, public petitions, media articles, personal experience of coalition members and coalition meeting minutes, and relevant research studies.

    “The primary sources of data included official government reports, parliamentary meetings, public petitions, media articles, personal experience of coalition members and coalition meeting minutes, and relevant research studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Kazakhstan is facing a growing public health crisis with the rise of vaping, especially among its young people.

    “Kazakhstan is also facing a growing public health crisis with the rise of vaping, especially among its young people.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study employed a case study approach to examine the advocacy campaign for a comprehensive vaping ban in Kazakhstan.

    “This study employed a case study approach to examine the advocacy campaign for a comprehensive vaping ban in Kazakhstan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Coalition's thorough and data-driven approach significantly strengthened the case when engaging decision-makers and the public.

    “This thorough and data-driven approach significantly strengthened the case when engaging decision-makers and the public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Participation from mothers and health experts during public hearings was especially impactful, as their testimonies publicly exposed and dismantled industry-backed manipulative arguments.

    “Participation from mothers and health experts during public hearings was especially impactful, as their compelling testimonies publicly exposed and dismantled industry-backed manipulative arguments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Criminal liability was justified as a tool for strict enforcement of the vaping ban.

    “The members also used international best practice in enforcing the smoking ban; therefore, criminal liability was again justified as a tool for strict enforcement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The vaping industry deliberately targets young people with flavored products, sleek technology-driven designs, and broad accessibility of toxic products.

    “The Coalition’s efforts highlighted how the vaping industry deliberately targets young people with flavored products and sleek, technology-driven designs and broad accessibility of toxic products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Public hearings helped counter industry misinformation and mobilize public support for the ban at the highest level.

    “In addition to online campaigns, public hearings helped counter industry misinformation and mobilize public support for the ban at the highest level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Minister of Health's direct impact, consistently advocating for a complete ban at the governmental level from 2022, was a game-changing factor in driving momentum and securing the final policy decision.

    “Critically, the direct impact of the Minister of Health of Kazakhstan, who consistently advocated for a complete ban on vaping products at the governmental level from 2022, proved to be a game-changing factor in driving momentum and securing the final policy decision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The campaign demonstrated the power of broad coalition-building, low-cost digital advocacy, and strategic political engagement in driving policy change.

    “The campaign demonstrated the power of broad coalition-building, low-cost digital advocacy, and strategic political engagement in driving policy change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase in supportive MPs to 18 significantly increased political pressure and impacted the discussion.

    “In addition, the Coalition and Majilis champions successfully engaged key political parties, “Respublika” and “Amanat,” thereby increasing the number of supportive members of parliament to 18, which significantly increased political pressure and impacted the discussion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    There was a low level of public awareness regarding the composition of and health risks associated with vapes, as well as a general lack of concern about potential health impacts.

    “This clearly indicated a low level of public awareness regarding the composition of and health risks associated with vapes, as well as a general lack of concern about potential health impacts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Key parliamentary champions included Nurgul Tau, Dr. Guldara Nurumova, Dr. Zarina Kamassova, and Mr. Edil Zhanbyrshin, whose backgrounds and expertise strengthened advocacy efforts.

    “Among the most impactful supporters at the parliamentary level was Mrs. Nurgul Tau, an experienced teacher and educator whose background significantly strengthened advocacy efforts at every internal political discussion, and two members of parliament (Dr. Guldara Nurumova and Dr. Zarina Kamassova) who provided valuable pro-health expertise as physicians from the early stage of the campaign in 2021”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Coalition representatives publicly exposed the fraudulent counterpetition in the media, effectively neutralizing the industry's attempt to undermine the advocacy campaign.

    “Coalition representatives publicly exposed this fraudulent initiative in the media, effectively neutralizing the industry’s attempt to undermine the advocacy campaign [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] CCS (2025, March 12). Vape Epidemic in Kazakhstan and Solutions. Available online: https://ortcom.kz/ru/video/1685011026.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The public hearings offered a platform for mothers, public health leaders, and medical professionals to share compelling testimonies about health risks and social impacts of vaping, and the consistent engagement of key stakeholders through these hearings significantly strengthened the overall campaign message and influenced policy discussions.

    “These hearings were particularly important, as they offered a platform for mothers, public health leaders, and medical professionals to share compelling testimonies about the health risks and social impacts of vaping.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.7. The Key Milestones of the Campaign · boosted
      “While the Coalition continued to advocate actively for incorporating criminal penalties into the vaping ban, the consistent engagement of key stakeholders through these public hearings significantly strengthened the overall campaign message and influenced policy discussions, underscoring widespread public support for total vaping prohibition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Regular interaction and update meetings with decision-makers helped build long-term relationships that proved valuable for the advocacy effort and created opportunities for ongoing dialogue and collaboration.

    “Regular interaction and update meetings with decision-makers helped build long-term relationships that proved valuable for the advocacy effort and created opportunities for ongoing dialogue and collaboration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
68 of 68
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The adolescent vaping trend in Kazakhstan can be inferred from combining data from different surveys with different age ranges and methods, despite limited direct comparability.

    “It is important to note that the data presented in Figure 1 are drawn from different studies, which limits the direct comparability of these figures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A complete ban on vaping products would reduce youth vaping by reducing accessibility and appeal.

    “Advocates emphasized that banning flavored e-cigarettes and vape products would significantly reduce their territorial and financial accessibility, particularly for minors, thus lowering usage rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vaping industry’s opposition to the ban was motivated by financial interest rather than public health.

    “The campaign not only focused on public health concerns but also worked to combat the influence of the vaping industry and its lobbying efforts.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vaping ban will lead to long-term public health protection.

    “These ongoing efforts ensure that the policy not only exists on paper but is meaningfully implemented, serving as a foundation for long-term public health protection and a blueprint for future advocacy campaigns.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Vaping had become an epidemic among Kazakhstani youth.

    “vaping had become an epidemic among the Kazakhstani youth”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Vape imports grew by about 29,063%, not nearly 300%

    Major

    The reported increase from 21,608 imported units in 2020 to 6,301,623 by early 2022 is about 29,063%, rather than nearly 300%.

    Reported 300 · recomputed 29163.379304

  • Reinstatement is dated before the events it reportedly followed

    Minor

    The narrative places the attempt to remove criminal liability after the July 2023 government approval, but says the clause was ultimately reinstated in September 2022.

  • Campaign duration conflicts with its start and end dates

    Minor

    The stated start of 27 October 2021 and signing in April 2024 span roughly 30 months, not 32 months.

  • GYTS figures are cited to a GATS reference

    Minor

    The text attributes the 2014 adolescent figures to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey and cites reference 9, but reference 9 is titled Global Adult Tobacco Survey.

  • Wu and O'Shea are assigned the wrong reference number

    Minor

    The text attributes a finding to Wu and O'Shea as reference 20, but the reference list identifies their paper as reference 19; reference 20 is by Blount and colleagues.

  • The stated 2014-2023 vaping increase is not nearly threefold

    Minor

    The reported rates rise from 1.6% in 2014 to 12.5% in 2023, a 7.8125-fold increase. The paper notes that the underlying studies and age groups differ, but those figures still do not support its description of a nearly threefold increase.

    Reported 3 · recomputed 7.8125

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Liga Potrebitelei Kazakhstana (2022, January 15). Kruglyi stol, posviashchennyi problemam zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniia odnorazovykh veipov i sistemnym narusheniiam tekushchego regulirovaniia. Proceedings of the Roundtable on the Problems of Legislative Regulation of Disposable Vapes and Systemic Violations of the Current Regulation, online.
  2. National Coalition for a Smoke-Free Kazakhstan (2025, July 04). On the Fake Vape-Industry Petition—Response Press Release of the National Coalition “For Kazakhstan—Free from Tobacco Smoke”. Vredno.kz. (In Russian).

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Sadykova, J., Ayaganova, A., & Yergaliyev, K. A.
Affiliations
  • National Coalition ‘For Smokefree Kazakstan’, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Aktobe Regional State University named after K.Zhubanov (KZ)
  • Suleyman Demirel University (KZ)
Corresponding author
Yergaliyev, Kuanysh A.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-07-13
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
1102
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412384944
Cited by
1
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nazarbayev University Repository (Nazarbayev University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
e-cigarette regulation, advocacy campaigns, youth vaping, civil society mobilization, social media advocacy, public health policy, Kazakhstan
MeSH terms
Vaping, Adolescent, Consumer Advocacy, Humans, Kazakhstan, Public Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review