The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications
Open accessAbstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a rapidly growing three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and has great potential in medicine. Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is a biocompatible high-performance polymer, which is suitable to be used as an orthopedic/dental implant material. However, the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of FDM-printed PEEK and its composites are still not clear. In this study, FDM-printed pure PEEK and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK) composite were successfully fabricated by FDM and characterized by mechanical tests. Moreover, the sample surfaces were modified with polishing and sandblasting methods to analyze the influence of surface roughness and topography on general biocompatibility (cytotoxicity) and cell adhesion. The results indicated that the printed CFR-PEEK samples had significantly higher general mechanical strengths than the printed pure PEEK (even though there was no statistical difference in compressive strength). Both PEEK and CFR-PEEK materials showed good biocompatibility with and without surface modification. Cell densities on the “as-printed” PEEK and the CFR-PEEK sample surfaces were significantly higher than on the corresponding polished and sandblasted samples. Therefore, the FDM-printed CFR-PEEK composite with proper mechanical strengths has potential as a biomaterial for bone grafting and tissue engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science.
Bauer, T. W., & Muschler, G. F. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,073
Bone Graft Materials: An Overview of the Basic Science
Bauer, T. W., & Muschler, G. F. (2000) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003 · Cited by 998
Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.
Ventola, C. L. (2014) · PubMed Central · Cited by 920
Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics
Najeeb, S., Zafar, M. S., Khurshid, Z., & Siddiqui, F. (2016) · Journal of Prosthodontic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 · Cited by 897
Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. (2015) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma8095271 · Cited by 881
A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects
Gittens, R. A., Scheideler, L., Rupp, F., Hyzy, S. L., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Schwartz, Z., & Boyan, B. D. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.032 · Cited by 849
Self-citationYang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662
Self-citationPolyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications
Panayotov, I. V., Orti, V., Cuisinier, F., & Yachouh, J. (2016) · Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-016-5731-4 · Cited by 603
Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses
Zhu, X., Chen, J., Scheideler, L., Reichl, R., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.011 · Cited by 534
Self-citationA review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: Theoretical and experimental aspects
Rupp, F., Gittens, R. A., Scheideler, L., Marmur, A., Boyan, B. D., Schwartz, Z., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040 · Cited by 507
Self-citation
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Fused filament fabrication of peek: A review of process-structure-property relationships
Zanjanijam, A. R., Major, I., Lyons, J. G., Lafont, U., & Devine, D. M. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12081665 · Cited by 240
Yang, D., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Yin, Y., & Li, D. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107149 · Cited by 155
Self-citationAbderrafai, Y., Diouf-Lewis, A., Sosa-Rey, F., Farahani, R. D., Piccirelli, N., Lévesque, M., & Therriault, D. (2023) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109839 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, X., Yang, D., Yang, C., Spintzyk, S., Scheideler, L., Li, P., Li, D., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., & Rupp, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-02-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240
- ISSN
- 2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913035035
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jcm8020240
- The paper
- Han, X., Yang, D., Yang, C., Spintzyk, S., Scheideler, L., Li, P., Li, D., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., & Rupp, F. (2019). Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
