The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: Theoretical and experimental aspects
Open accessAbstract
The surface wettability of biomaterials determines the biological cascade of events at the biomaterial/host interface. Wettability is modulated by surface characteristics, such as surface chemistry and surface topography. However, the design of current implant surfaces focuses mainly on specific micro- and nanotopographical features and is still far from predicting the concomitant wetting behavior. There is an increasing interest in understanding the wetting mechanisms of implant surfaces and the role of wettability on the biological response at the implant/bone or implant/soft tissue interface. Fundamental knowledge related to the influence of surface roughness (i.e., a quantification of surface topography) on titanium and titanium alloy surface wettability, and the different associated wetting regimes, can improve our understanding of the role of wettability of rough implant surfaces on the biological outcome. Such an approach has been applied to biomaterial surfaces only in a limited way. Focusing on titanium dental and orthopaedic implants, the present study reviews the current knowledge on the wettability of biomaterial surfaces, encompassing basic and applied aspects that include measurement techniques, thermodynamic aspects of wetting, and models predicting topographical and roughness effects on the wetting behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807 · cited 16×
“Fundamental theories of roughness-induced wetting were initially described about 70 years ago [92,93] and are still under intense research due to their widespread technical and biomedical importance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER
Wenzel, R. N. (1936) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ie50320a024 · Cited by 13,316 · cited 1×
“Fundamental theories of roughness-induced wetting were initially described about 70 years ago [92,93] and are still under intense research due to their widespread technical and biomedical importance.”
Background
Cited by
Han, X., Yang, D., Yang, C., Spintzyk, S., Scheideler, L., Li, P., Li, D., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., & Rupp, F. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8020240 · Cited by 361
Self-citationYuan, B., Cheng, Q., Zhao, R., Zhu, X., Yang, X., Yang, X., Zhang, K., Song, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.014 · Cited by 204
Lin, K.-F., He, S., Song, Y., Wang, C.-M., Gao, Y., Li, J.-Q., Tang, P., Wang, Z., Bi, L., & Pei, G.-X. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b00815 · Cited by 176
Jing, Z., Pan, Z., Liang, J., Li, Y., & Mohd Said, F. (2024) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112753 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Rupp, F., Gittens, R. A., Scheideler, L., Marmur, A., Boyan, B. D., Schwartz, Z., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2894-2906
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091277905
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: Theoretical and experimental aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040
- The paper
- Rupp, F., Gittens, R. A., Scheideler, L., Marmur, A., Boyan, B. D., Schwartz, Z., & Geis-Gerstorfer, J. (2014). A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: Theoretical and experimental aspects. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
