Cited by 13Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics research

Development of an imaging flow cytometry method for fungal cytological profiling and its potential application in antifungal drug development

Open access
McMahon, Courtney L., Esqueda, Marisol, Yu, Jieh-Juen, Wall, Gina, Romo, Jesus A., Vila, Taissa, Chaturvedi, Ashok, Lopez-Ribot, Jose L. +2 more·2023·Journal of Fungi

Abstract

Automated imaging techniques have been in increasing demand for the more advanced analysis and efficient characterization of cellular phenotypes. The success of the image-based profiling method hinges on assays that can rapidly and simultaneously capture a wide range of phenotypic features. We have developed an automated image acquisition method for fungal cytological profiling (FCP) using an imaging flow cytometer that can objectively measure over 250 features of a single fungal cell. Fungal cells were labeled with calcofluor white and FM4-64FX, which bind to the cell wall and lipophilic membrane, respectively. Images of single cells were analyzed using IDEAS® software. We first acquired FCPs of fungal cells treated with fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin, each with a distinct mode of action, to establish FCP databases of profiles associated with specific antifungal treatment. Once fully established, we investigated the potential application of this technique as a screening methodology to identify compounds with novel antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans. Altogether, we have developed a rapid, powerful, and novel image-profiling method for the phenotypic characterization of fungal cells, also with potential applications in antifungal drug development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jof9070722

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. [1]Richardson M.D. Changing patterns and trends in systemic fungal infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005 56 (Suppl. S1) i5 i11 10.1093/jac/dki218 16120635 · DOI
  2. [2]Gintjee T.J. Donnelley M.A. Thompson G.R. 3rd Aspiring Antifungals: Review of Current Antifungal Pipeline Developments J. Fungi 2020 6 28 10.3390/jof6010028 32106450 PMC7151215 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Rauseo A.M. Coler-Reilly A. Larson L. Spec A. Hope on the Horizon: Novel Fungal Treatments in Development Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020 7 ofaa016 10.1093/ofid/ofaa016 32099843 PMC7031074 · DOI
  4. [4]Morris M.I. Villmann M. Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, Part 2 Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2006 63 1813 1820 10.2146/ajhp050464.p2 16990627 · DOI
  5. [5]Morris M.I. Villmann M. Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, Part 1 Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2006 63 1693 1703 10.2146/ajhp050464.p1 16960253 · DOI
  6. [6]Hamill R.J. Amphotericin B formulations: A comparative review of efficacy and toxicity Drugs 2013 73 919 934 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4 23729001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Alexander B.D. Johnson M.D. Pfeiffer C.D. Jimenez-Ortigosa C. Catania J. Booker R. Castanheira M. Messer S.A. Perlin D.S. Pfaller M.A. Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: Clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013 56 1724 1732 10.1093/cid/cit136 23487382 PMC3658363 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Sanglard D. Emerging Threats in Antifungal-Resistant Fungal Pathogens Front. Med. 2016 3 11 10.3389/fmed.2016.00011 PMC4791369 27014694 · DOI
  9. [9]Mitchison T.J. Small-molecule screening and profiling by using automated microscopy Chembiochem 2005 6 33 39 10.1002/cbic.200400272 15568196 · DOI
  10. [12]Willis C. Nyffeler J. Harrill J. Phenotypic Profiling of Reference Chemicals across Biologically Diverse Cell Types Using the Cell Painting Assay SLAS Discov. Adv. Sci. Drug Discov. 2020 25 755 769 10.1177/2472555220928004 PMC9710725 32546035 · DOI
  11. [14]Lutgring J.D. Machado M.-J. Benahmed F.H. Conville P. Shawar R.M. Patel J. Brown A.C. FDA-CDC Antimicrobial Resistance Isolate Bank: A Publicly Available Resource To Support Research, Development, and Regulatory Requirements J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018 56 e01415 e01417 10.1128/JCM.01415-17 29118174 PMC5786719 · DOI
  12. [16]Harrington B.J. Hageage J.G.J. Calcofluor White: A Review of its Uses and Applications in Clinical Mycology and Parasitology Lab. Med. 2003 34 361 367 10.1309/EPH2TDT8335GH0R3 · DOI
  13. [17]Zheng B. Wu J.N. Schober W. Lewis D.E. Vida T. Isolation of yeast mutants defective for localization of vacuolar vital dyes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998 95 11721 11726 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11721 9751732 PMC21707 · DOI
  14. [18]Wall G. Chaturvedi A.K. Wormley F.L. Wiederhold N.P. Patterson H.P. Patterson T.F. Lopez-Ribot J.L. Screening a Repurposing Library for Inhibitors of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Identifies Ebselen as a Repositionable Candidate for Antifungal Drug Development Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018 62 e01084-18 10.1128/AAC.01084-18 30104269 PMC6153848 · DOI
  15. [19]Butts A. DiDone L. Koselny K. Baxter B.K. Chabrier-Rosello Y. Wellington M. Krysan D.J. A repurposing approach identifies off-patent drugs with fungicidal cryptococcal activity, a common structural chemotype, and pharmacological properties relevant to the treatment of cryptococcosis Eukaryot. Cell 2013 12 278 287 10.1128/EC.00314-12 23243064 PMC3571299 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [20]Jabes D.L. de Freitas Oliveira A.C. Alencar V.C. Menegidio F.B. Reno D.L. Santos D.S. Barbosa D.A. Vilas Boas R.O. de Oliveira Rodrigues Cunha R.L. Rodrigues T. Thioridazine inhibits gene expression control of the cell wall signaling pathway (CWI) in the human pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Mol. Genet. Genom. MGG 2016 291 1347 1362 10.1007/s00438-016-1184-1 26956010 · DOI
  17. [21]Vitale R.G. Afeltra J. Meis J.F. Verweij P.E. Activity and post antifungal effect of chlorpromazine and trifluopherazine against Aspergillus, Scedosporium and zygomycetes Mycoses 2007 50 270 276 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01371.x 17576318 · DOI
  18. [22]Galgoczy L. Bacsi A. Homa M. Viragh M. Papp T. Vagvolgyi C. In vitro antifungal activity of phenothiazines and their combination with amphotericin B against different Candida species Mycoses 2011 54 e737 e743 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.02010.x 21605196 · DOI
  19. [23]Eilam Y. Polacheck I. Ben-Gigi G. Chernichovsky D. Activity of phenothiazines against medically important yeasts Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1987 31 834 836 10.1128/AAC.31.5.834 3300543 PMC174848 · DOI
  20. [24]Wang Y. Casadevall A. Susceptibility of melanized and nonmelanized Cryptococcus neoformans to the melanin-binding compounds trifluoperazine and chloroquine Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996 40 541 545 10.1128/AAC.40.3.541 8851567 PMC163154 · DOI
  21. [25]Fuchs B.B. RajaMuthiah R. Souza A.C. Eatemadpour S. Rossoni R.D. Santos D.A. Junqueira J.C. Rice L.B. Mylonakis E. Inhibition of bacterial and fungal pathogens by the orphaned drug auranofin Future Med. Chem. 2016 8 117 132 10.4155/fmc.15.182 26808006 PMC4976847 · DOI
  22. [26]Thangamani S. Eldesouky H.E. Mohammad H. Pascuzzi P.E. Avramova L. Hazbun T.R. Seleem M.N. Ebselen exerts antifungal activity by regulating glutathione (GSH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in fungal cells Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017 1861 3002 3010 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.09.029 PMC5148707 27712973 · DOI
  23. [27]Wiederhold N.P. Patterson T.F. Srinivasan A. Chaturvedi A.K. Fothergill A.W. Wormley F.L. Ramasubramanian A.K. Lopez-Ribot J.L. Repurposing auranofin as an antifungal: In vitro activity against a variety of medically important fungi Virulence 2017 8 138 142 10.1080/21505594.2016.1196301 27268469 PMC5354159 · DOI
  24. [28]Orie N.N. Warren A.R. Basaric J. Lau-Cam C. Pietka-Ottlik M. Mlochowski J. Billack B. In vitro assessment of the growth and plasma membrane H+-ATPase inhibitory activity of ebselen and structurally related selenium- and sulfur-containing compounds in Candida albicans J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2017 31 e21892 10.1002/jbt.21892 28151580 · DOI
  25. [29]Wall G. Herrera N. Lopez-Ribot J.L. Repositionable Compounds with Antifungal Activity against Multidrug Resistant Candida auris Identified in the Medicines for Malaria Venture’s Pathogen Box J. Fungi 2019 5 92 10.3390/jof5040092 PMC6958377 31581540 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [30]de Matos R.F. Mendonca L.C.V. da Silva Souza K.G. Fonseca A.A.D. Costa E.M.S. de Lima M.V.D. Vieira J. de Brito M. Monteiro M.C. Nimesulide inhibits pathogenic fungi: PGE2-dependent mechanisms Folia Microbiol. 2017 62 169 174 10.1007/s12223-016-0483-6 27866353 · DOI
  27. [31]Vu K. Gelli A. Astemizole and an analogue promote fungicidal activity of fluconazole against Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and Cryptococcus gattii Med. Mycol. 2010 48 255 262 10.3109/13693780903081968 19572230 · DOI
  28. [32]Dennis E.K. Garneau-Tsodikova S. Synergistic combinations of azoles and antihistamines against Candida species in vitro Med. Mycol. 2018 57 874 884 10.1093/mmy/myy088 30295881 · DOI
  29. [33]Garcia C. Burgain A. Chaillot J. Pic E. Khemiri I. Sellam A. A phenotypic small-molecule screen identifies halogenated salicylanilides as inhibitors of fungal morphogenesis, biofilm formation and host cell invasion Sci. Rep. 2018 8 11559 10.1038/s41598-018-29973-8 30068935 PMC6070544 · DOI
  30. [34]Beggs W.H. Anti-Candida activity of the anti-cancer drug tamoxifen Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1993 80 125 128 8488339
  31. [35]Dolan K. Montgomery S. Buchheit B. Didone L. Wellington M. Krysan D.J. Antifungal activity of tamoxifen: In vitro and in vivo activities and mechanistic characterization Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009 53 3337 3346 10.1128/AAC.01564-08 19487443 PMC2715577 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [36]Maguire O. Collins C. O’Loughlin K. Miecznikowski J. Minderman H. Quantifying nuclear p65 as a parameter for NF-κB activation: Correlation between ImageStream cytometry, microscopy, and Western blot Cytom. Part A 2011 79 Pt A 461 469 10.1002/cyto.a.21068 PMC3140714 21520400 · DOI
  33. [37]George T.C. Fanning S.L. Fitzgeral-Bocarsly P. Medeiros R.B. Highfill S. Shimizu Y. Hall B.E. Frost K. Basiji D. Ortyn W.E. Quantitative measurement of nuclear translocation events using similarity analysis of multispectral cellular images obtained in flow J. Immunol. Methods 2006 311 117 129 10.1016/j.jim.2006.01.018 16563425 · DOI
  34. [38]Cerveira J. Begum J. Di Marco Barros R. van der Veen A.G. Filby A. An imaging flow cytometry-based approach to measuring the spatiotemporal calcium mobilisation in activated T cells J. Immunol. Methods 2015 423 120 130 10.1016/j.jim.2015.04.030 25967946 · DOI
  35. [39]Filby A. Perucha E. Summers H. Rees P. Chana P. Heck S. Lord G.M. Davies D. An imaging flow cytometric method for measuring cell division history and molecular symmetry during mitosis Cytom. Part A 2011 79 Pt A 496 506 10.1002/cyto.a.21091 21638766 · DOI
  36. [40]Patterson J.O. Swaffer M. Filby A. An Imaging Flow Cytometry-based approach to analyse the fission yeast cell cycle in fixed cells Methods 2015 82 74 84 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.026 25952947 · DOI
  37. [41]Chia W.N. Lee Y.Q. Tan K.S.-W. Imaging flow cytometry for the screening of compounds that disrupt the Plasmodium falciparum digestive vacuole Methods 2017 112 211 220 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.07.002 27389304 · DOI
  38. [42]Barteneva N.S. Fasler-Kan E. Vorobjev I.A. Imaging flow cytometry: Coping with heterogeneity in biological systems J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012 60 723 733 10.1369/0022155412453052 22740345 PMC3524563 · DOI
  39. [43]McFarlin B.K. Gary M.A. Flow cytometry what you see matters: Enhanced clinical detection using image-based flow cytometry Methods 2017 112 1 8 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.001 27620330 · DOI
  40. [44]Georgopapadakou N.H. Antifungals: Mechanism of action and resistance, established and novel drugs Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998 1 547 557 10.1016/S1369-5274(98)80087-8 10066533 · DOI
  41. [45]Demers E.G. Biermann A.R. Masonjones S. Crocker A.W. Ashare A. Stajich J.E. Hogan D.A. Evolution of drug resistance in an antifungal-naive chronic Candida lusitaniae Infection Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 12040 12045 10.1073/pnas.1807698115 30389707 PMC6255150 · DOI
  42. [46]Vanden Bossche H. Dromer F. Improvisi I. Lozano-Chiu M. Rex J.H. Sanglard D. Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi Med. Mycol. 1998 36 (Suppl. S1) 119 128 9988500
  43. [47]Fernandez-Silva F. Lackner M. Capilla J. Mayayo E. Sutton D. Castanheira M. Fothergill A.W. Lass-Florl C. Guarro J. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida glabrata to caspofungin and the presence of FKS mutations correlate with treatment response in an immunocompromised murine model of invasive infection Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014 58 3646 3649 10.1128/AAC.02666-13 24733474 PMC4068555 · DOI
  44. [49]Klepser M.E. Wolfe E.J. Pfaller M.A. Antifungal pharmacodynamic characteristics of fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus neoformans J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998 41 397 401 10.1093/jac/41.3.397 9578168 · DOI
  45. [50]Kordalewska M. Lee A. Park S. Berrio I. Chowdhary A. Zhao Y. Perlin D.S. Understanding Echinocandin Resistance in the Emerging Pathogen Candida auris Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018 62 e00238-18 10.1128/AAC.00238-18 29632013 PMC5971591 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [51]Maligie M.A. Selitrennikoff C.P. Cryptococcus neoformans resistance to echinocandins:(1,3) β-glucan synthase activity is sensitive to echinocandins Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005 49 2851 2856 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2851-2856.2005 15980360 PMC1168702 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [52]Sionov E. Chang Y.C. Garraffo H.M. Kwon-Chung K.J. Heteroresistance to fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans is intrinsic and associated with virulence Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009 53 2804 2815 10.1128/AAC.00295-09 19414582 PMC2704677 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [53]Butts A. Martin J.A. DiDone L. Bradley E.K. Mutz M. Krysan D.J. Structure-activity relationships for the antifungal activity of selective estrogen receptor antagonists related to tamoxifen PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0125927 10.1371/journal.pone.0125927 26016941 PMC4446328 · DOI
  49. [54]Ngan N.T.T. Mai N.T.H. Tung N.L.N. Lan N.P.H. Tai L.T.H. Phu N.H. Chau N.V.V. Binh T.Q. Hung L.Q. Beardsley J. A randomized open label trial of tamoxifen combined with amphotericin B and fluconazole for cryptococcal meningitis Wellcome Open Res. 2019 4 8 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15010.1 30801037 PMC6381443 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahon, C. L., Esqueda, M., Yu, J.-J., Wall, G., Romo, J. A., Vila, T., Chaturvedi, A., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Wormley, F., & Hung, C.-Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology and South Texas Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Corresponding author
Hung, Chiung-Yu
Venue
Journal of Fungi
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-30
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
722
ISSN
2309-608X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382940804
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Fungi (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NIH (R21 AI149015, R01 AI135005, U19AI166761, R33AI140823)
  • Margaret Batts Tobin Foundation, San Antonio, TX (R21 AI149015, R01 AI135005, U19AI166761, R33AI140823)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
imaging flow cytometry, antifungal drug development, antifungal screening, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, calcofluor white, fluconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, fungal cell wall, fungal membranes, phenotypic profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review