Cited by 178Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics research

Cryptococcus neoformans Resistance to Echinocandins: (1,3)β-Glucan Synthase Activity Is Sensitive to Echinocandins

Open access
Maligie, Marybeth A., Selitrennikoff, Claude P.·2005·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

(1,3)β- d -Glucan synthase (EC 2.4.1.34. UDP-glucose: 1,3-β- d -glucan 3-β-glucosyltransferase) uses UDP-glucose as substrate and catalyzes the polymerization of glucose ([1,3]-β-linkages) to form the major carbohydrate component of the fungal cell wall. We have optimized in vitro assay conditions for (1,3)β-glucan synthase activity from Cryptococcus neoformans . Cells lysed in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.75, containing 20% glycerol, 2 mM NaF, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1% protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails, and 60 μM GTPγS produced maximum specific activity in vitro. We tested in vitro C. neoformans (1,3)β-glucan synthase activity against the (1,3)β-glucan synthase inhibitors, caspofungin and cilofungin, and have determined that (1,3)β-glucan synthase activity is very sensitive (apparent K i of 0.17 ± 0.02 μM and 22 ± 5.7 μM, respectively) to these echinocandins. Taken together with high MICs for C. neoformans (caspofungin MIC, 16 μg/ml; cilofungin MIC, 64 μg/ml), our results indicate that C. neoformans is resistant to caspofungin and cilofungin by a mechanism(s) unrelated to (1,3)β-glucan synthase resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.49.7.2851-2856.2005

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The resistance of Cryptococcus to echinocandins is paradoxical because β-1,3-glucan synthase, the enzymatic target of echinocandins, is essential in Cryptococcus and has been demonstrated to be potently inhibited by echinocandins biochemically.

    “This resistance is paradoxical, as β-1,3-glucan synthase, the enzymatic target of the echinocandins, is essential in Cryptococcus and has been demonstrated to be potently inhibited by echinocandins biochemically44,45.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Jabri, E., C. Taft, D. Quigley, M. Hrmova, P. Phelps, M. Alders, and C. P. Selitrennikoff. 1989. (1-3)-β-glucan synthase of Neurospora. Curr. Microbiol. 19:153-161. [Google Scholar]
  2. [44]van Duin, D., A. Casadevall, and J. D. Nosanchuk. 2002. Melanization of Cryptococcus neoformans and Histoplasma capsulatum reduces their susceptibilities to amphotericin B and caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3394-3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maligie, M. A., & Selitrennikoff, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Health (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2005-07
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
2851-2856
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2128575896
Cited by
178
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1 R21 AI05883)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, echinocandin resistance, caspofungin, beta-1,3-glucan synthase, fungal cell wall, UDP-glucose, enzyme inhibition, minimum inhibitory concentration, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcus neoformans, Fungal Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Peptides, Cyclic, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review