Cited by 6Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography: Investigation of Concordance between the Two Methods for Measurement of the Cardiac Chamber

Open access
Gürdoğan, Muhammet, Ustabaşıoğlu, Fethi Emre, Kula, Osman, Korkmaz, Selçuk·2019·Medicina

Abstract

Background and objectives: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard method for the detection of ventricular volumes and myocardial edema/scar. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) imaging is primarily used in the evaluation of cardiac functions and chamber dimensions. This study aims to investigate whether the chamber diameter measurements are concordant with each other in the same patient group who underwent TTE and CMR. Materials and Methods: The study included 41 patients who underwent TTE and CMR imaging. Ventricular and atrial diameter measurements from TTE-derived standard parasternal long axis and apical four-chamber views and CMR-derived three- and four-chamber views were recorded. The concordance between the two methods was compared using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Results: Of the patients, 25 (61%) were male and the mean age was 48.12 ± 16.79. The mean ICC for LVDD between CMR observers was 0.957 (95% CI: 0.918–0.978), while the mean ICC between CMR and TTE measurements were 0.849 (95% CI: 0.709–0.922) and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.684–0.915), respectively. The mean ICC for the right ventricle between CMR observers was 0.985 (95% CI: 0.971–0.992), while the mean ICC between CMR and TTE measurements were 0.869 (95% CI: 0.755–0.930) and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.799–0.942), respectively. Passing–Bablok Regression and Bland–Altman plots indicated high concordance between the two methods. Conclusions: TTE and CMR indicated high concordance in chamber diameter measurements for which the CMR should be considered in patients for whom optimal evaluation with TTE could not be performed due to their limitations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/medicina55060260

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is considered the noninvasive gold standard method for quantifying cardiac output.

    “Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is considered the noninvasive gold standard method for quantifying cardiac output [59].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Introduction describes CMR as noninvasive and as the gold standard for volumetric assessment of ventricular function. It lists cardiac output among volumetric measurements studied with CMR, but does not specifically call CMR the gold standard for quantifying cardiac output. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CMRI allows detailed evaluation of ventricular volumes and function, myocardial tissue edema, fibrosis, and scarring, thus facilitating the diagnosis of heart failure, myocarditis and congenital heart disease.

    “It allows detailed evaluation of ventricular volumes and function, myocardial tissue edema, fibrosis, and scarring, thus facilitating the diagnosis of heart failure, myocarditis and congenital heart disease (e.g., borderline hypoplastic left ventricle) [59].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gürdoğan, M., Ustabaşıoğlu, F. E., Kula, O., & Korkmaz, S.
Affiliations
Trakya University (TR)
Corresponding author
Gürdoğan, Muhammet
Venue
Medicina
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-06-09
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
260
ISSN
  • 1010-660X (ISSN-L)
  • 1648-9144
OpenAlex
W2948174104
Cited by
6
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicina (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Trakya University's Institutional Open Access System (Trakya University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Keywords
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, intermodality agreement, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, right ventricular size, atrial dimensions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Echocardiography, Female, Heart, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Weights and Measures, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review