Cited by 20Psychiatric care and mental health servicesBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Pre-Discharge Predictors of 1-Year Rehospitalization in Adolescents and Young Adults with Severe Mental Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Open access
Bartoli, Francesco, Cavaleri, Daniele, Moretti, Federico, Bachi, Bianca, Calabrese, Angela, Callovini, Tommaso, Cioni, Riccardo M., Riboldi, Ilaria +3 more·2020·Medicina

Abstract

Background and objectives: Readmissions of youths hospitalized for a severe mental disorder are common events and bear a remarkable human, social, and economic burden. The current study aimed at evaluating predictors of 1-year rehospitalization in a sample of adolescents and young adults with severe mental disorders. Materials and Methods: Data for ≤25-year-old inpatients with a severe mental disorder and consecutively admitted between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2019 were collected. Subjects were retrospectively assessed over a follow-up period of one year after the index discharge to track readmissions—i.e., the primary outcome variable. Standard descriptive statistics were used. The association between variables and 1-year rehospitalization was estimated using the univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. We then carried out a multivariable Cox regression model, also estimating the covariate-adjusted survivor function. Hazard ratios (HRs) with related 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were provided. Results: The final sample included 125 individuals. The multivariable Cox regression model estimated that co-occurring substance use disorders (HR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.26; p = 0.029) and being admitted for a suicide attempt (HR = 2.49; 95% CI: 1.13 to 5.49; p = 0.024) were both significant predictors of 1-year rehospitalization. Conclusions: Our study showed that comorbid substance use disorders and being admitted for a suicide attempt were predictors of early readmission in youths with severe mental disorders. Although their generalizability is limited, our findings could contribute to improve the quality of young patients’ mental health care by identifying vulnerable subjects who may benefit from tailored interventions to prevent rehospitalizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/medicina56110613

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Destructive experiential avoidance behaviors in adolescents increase the public health burden, such as rehospitalizations and emergency department visits.

    “As previous studies indicated, DEA behaviors in adolescents also increase the public health burden, such as rehospitalizations and emergency department visits [16,17].”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Destructive Experiential Avoidance (ACT-DEA): A Feasibility Study (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion (§4.1) reports that substance use disorders and admission after a suicide attempt predicted rehospitalization among adolescents and young adults with severe mental disorders. The paper does not classify these as destructive experiential avoidance behaviors or report emergency department visits, and its findings do not extend to adolescents generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartoli, F., Cavaleri, D., Moretti, F., Bachi, B., Calabrese, A., Callovini, T., Cioni, R. M., Riboldi, I., Nacinovich, R., Crocamo, C., & Carrà, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bartoli, Francesco
Venue
Medicina
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-15
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
613
ISSN
  • 1010-660X (ISSN-L)
  • 1648-9144
OpenAlex
W3098143157
Cited by
20
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicina (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
hospital readmission, adolescents, young adults, severe mental illness, substance use disorders, suicide attempts, predictors of readmission, psychiatric inpatient care, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Hospitalization, Humans, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review