The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prospects of Zinc as a Structural Material for Biodegradable Implants—A Review Paper
Open accessAbstract
In the last decade, iron and magnesium, both pure and alloyed, have been extensively studied as potential biodegradable metals for medical applications. However, broad experience with these material systems has uncovered critical limitations in terms of their suitability for clinical applications. Recently, zinc and zinc-based alloys have been proposed as new additions to the list of degradable metals and as promising alternatives to magnesium and iron. The main byproduct of zinc metal corrosion, Zn2+, is highly regulated within physiological systems and plays a critical role in numerous fundamental cellular processes. Zn2+ released from an implant may suppress harmful smooth muscle cells and restenosis in arteries, while stimulating beneficial osteogenesis in bone. An important limitation of pure zinc as a potential biodegradable structural support, however, lies in its low strength (σUTS ~ 30 MPa) and plasticity (ε < 0.25%) that are insufficient for most medical device applications. Developing high strength and ductility zinc with sufficient hardness, while retaining its biocompatibility, is one of the main goals of metallurgical engineering. This paper will review and compare the biocompatibility, corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of pure zinc, as well as currently researched zinc alloys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zinc and immune function: the biological basis of altered resistance to infection
Shankar, A. H., & Prasad, A. S. (1998) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/68.2.447s · Cited by 1,606
The Essential Toxin: Impact of Zinc on Human Health
Plum, L. M., Rink, L., & Haase, H. (2010) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph7041342 · Cited by 1,577
Long-term surveillance of zinc implant in murine artery: Surprisingly steady biocorrosion rate
Drelich, A. J., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Drelich, J. W., & Goldman, J. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.045 · Cited by 188
Self-citation
Cited by
Corrosion of Metallic Biomaterials: A Review
Eliaz, N. (2019) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma12030407 · Cited by 984
Yuan, L., Ding, S., & Wen, C. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003 · Cited by 593
Additive manufacturing of biodegradable metals: Current research status and future perspectives
Qin, Y., Wen, P., Guo, H., Xia, D., Zheng, Y., Jauer, L., Poprawe, R., Voshage, M., & Schleifenbaum, J. H. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046 · Cited by 303
Additively manufactured biodegradable porous iron
Li, Y., Jahr, H., Lietaert, K., Pavanram, P., Yilmaz, A., Fockaert, L. I., Leeflang, M. A., Pouran, B., Gonzalez-Garcia, Y., Weinans, H., et al. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.011 · Cited by 299
Biodegradable magnesium‐based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities
Amukarimi, S., & Mozafari, M. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.59 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Katarivas Levy, G., Goldman, J., & Aghion, E.
- Venue
- Metals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-10-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 402
- ISSN
- 2075-4701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2757866366
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prospects of Zinc as a Structural Material for Biodegradable Implants—A Review Paper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/met7100402
- The paper
- Katarivas Levy, G., Goldman, J., & Aghion, E. (2017). The Prospects of Zinc as a Structural Material for Biodegradable Implants—A Review Paper. Metals. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7100402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.