Cited by 36Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Eating Behaviour Predicts Weight Loss Six Months After Bariatric Surgery: A Longitudinal Study

Open access
Subramaniam, Kavitha, Low, Wah-Yun, Lau, Peng-Choong, Chin, Kin-Fah, Chinna, Karuthan, Kosai, Nik Ritza, Taher, Mustafa Mohammed, Rajan, Reynu·2018·Nutrients

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is currently the most durable weight loss solution for patients with morbid obesity. The extent of weight loss achieved, however, is subject to variation due to various factors, including patients’ behaviour. In this study, we aimed to identify pre- and post-surgical predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery. This prospective study included 57 participants who went through bariatric surgery (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: n = 30; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: n = 23; one anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass: n = 4) in two tertiary referral hospitals. Consenting participants were assessed prior to surgery (T0), and three months (T1) and six months (T2) after surgery. The assessment included interview and anthropometric measurements. The interview was done with the aid of instruments, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression screening and the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) for eating behaviour assessment. Baseline comorbidity status was obtained from medical records. A Generalised Estimating Equation (GEE) was developed to determine predictors of weight loss. Participants in the study were mostly women (n = 37, 65%) with a mean age of 39.4 (SD = 10.01) years. The mean excess BMI loss (EBMIL) and total weight loss (TWL) at the sixth month was 63.31% and 23.83%, respectively. Anxiety, depression, and external eating scores reduced over time. Advancing age, high BMI, and higher scores for emotional and external eating emerged as significant negative predictors for TWL%. It can be concluded that the patients experienced substantial weight loss after surgery. Continuous monitoring of psychological well-being and eating behaviour are essential for optimal weight loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu10111616

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beyond 18 months after bariatric surgery, results on emotion-based eating are mixed, with some studies suggesting attenuation through 36 months and others finding reoccurrence between 12 and 36 months.

    “Results beyond the 18-month timeframe are mixed, with some studies suggesting attenuation of emotion-based eating through 36 months after having bariatric surgery and other studies finding reoccurrence between 12 and 36 months after having bariatric surgery (33–39).”

    From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods and Results describe assessments only through six months after surgery. The Discussion mentions a separate two-year finding about emotional eating and weight loss, but does not report mixed findings, attenuation through 36 months, or recurrence between 12 and 36 months. Searches for those longer-term patterns found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Herman C. Polivy J. Obesity Restrained Eating Saunders Philadelphia, PA, USA 1980 208 225
  2. [33]Hedeker D. Gibbons R.D. Longitudinal Data Analysis 6th ed. Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subramaniam, K., Low, W.-Y., Lau, P.-C., Chin, K.-F., Chinna, K., Kosai, N. R., Taher, M. M., & Rajan, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY)
Corresponding author
Low, Wah-Yun
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-11-02
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1616
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899228565
Cited by
36
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universiti Malaya (PV122/2012A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
bariatric surgery, eating behaviour, weight loss, morbid obesity, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, emotional eating, external eating, anxiety, depression, predictors of weight loss, excess BMI loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review