Cited by 175Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Suboptimal weight loss after gastric bypass surgery: correlation of demographics, comorbidities, and insurance status with outcomes

Melton, Genevieve B., Steele, Kimberley E., Schweitzer, Michael A., Lidor, Anne O., Magnuson, Thomas H.·2008·Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGBP) is safe and effective at achieving weight loss in the majority of severely obese patients, a subset fails to achieve expected weight loss outcomes. Factors associated with poor weight loss are not well defined. Patients undergoing open RYGBP using a standardized surgical technique and clinical pathway by a single surgeon at a dedicated bariatric center were reviewed. Suboptimal weight loss was defined as failure to lose at least 40% excess body weight by 12 months postoperatively. Of 555 consecutive patients who underwent RYGBP from 1999 to 2004, a 12-month follow-up was available for the 495 (89%). Suboptimal weight loss occurred in 55 (11%) and was associated on unadjusted bivariate analysis with increased body mass index (BMI; p = 0.0002), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0002), Medicaid insurance (p = 0.04), and male sex (p = 0.01). On adjusted multivariate analysis, increased BMI (p = 0.003), diabetes (p = 0.002), and male gender (p = 0.04) were associated with suboptimal weight loss, but type of insurance (p = 0.11) was not. Medicaid patients were younger (p = 0.01) and had higher BMI (p = 0.0002). Suboptimal weight loss after RYGBP appears to be associated with greater BMI, male sex, and diabetes but not type of insurance. This study may help identify patients who could benefit from increased perioperative education and counseling or selection of procedures with greater malabsorption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11605-007-0427-1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melton, G. B., Steele, K. E., Schweitzer, M. A., Lidor, A. O., & Magnuson, T. H.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Magnuson, Thomas H.
Venue
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
250-255
ISSN
1091-255X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025375061
Cited by
175
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, weight loss outcomes, obesity, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, Medicaid, male sex, risk factors, malabsorptive surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Period, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, United States, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review