Cited by 22Gastrointestinal motility and disordersFood composition and propertiesMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Efficacy of Polydextrose Supplementation on Colonic Transit Time, Bowel Movements, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open access
Ibarra, Alvin, Pelipyagina, Tetyana, Rueffer, Matthew, Evans, Malkanthi, Ouwehand, Arthur C.·2019·Nutrients

Abstract

The addition of fiber is one of the most important dietary means to relieve constipation through lifestyle modification. Polydextrose (PDX) has been reported in several studies to increase fecal bulk, soften stools, and increase the number of defecations. However, there are few studies on the effect of PDX on colonic transit time (CTT). Therefore, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the effect of PDX on CTT and other aspects of gastrointestinal function during two weeks (Day 1 to Day 14), preceded by a 2-week run-in period (Day -14 to Day -1). A total of 192 adults who were diagnosed with functional constipation per Rome III criteria were recruited for the study. Participants were randomized equally into 4 groups (12 g, 8 g, or 4 g of PDX or placebo per day). The primary endpoint was CTT, assessed using radio-opaque markers and abdominal X-rays on Day 0, the baseline; and Day 15, the end of the intervention. Secondary outcomes that were measured using inventories were the patient assessment of constipation symptoms and quality of life, bowel function index, relief of constipation, bowel movement frequency (BMF), stool consistency, degree of straining, and proportion of bowel movements. Ancillary parameters and harms were also evaluated. The recruited population was not sufficiently constipated (e.g., baseline values for CTT and BMF of 42 h and 8.7 BMF/week, respectively). Despite this limitation, our results demonstrated an increased number of bowel movements when supplemented with PDX at a dosage of 12 g per day for 2 weeks. This dosage also consistently improved the secondary outcomes that were measured using inventories at Day 15, compared with the baseline. No serious or significant adverse events were reported during the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11020439

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dietary fibers and probiotics may relieve constipation via optimizing gut microbiome.

    “Dietary fibers/probiotics may relieve constipation via optimizing gut microbiome, yet with limited trial-based evidences.”

    From Effects of dietary fibers or probiotics on functional constipation symptoms and roles of gut microbiota: a double-blinded randomized placebo trial (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says fiber is a dietary means to relieve constipation and that studies of polydextrose’s effect on transit time are few and inconclusive. It does not say that relief occurs by optimizing the gut microbiome or establish a similar benefit for probiotics; the limited-evidence statement is specific to polydextrose and transit time. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psyllium husk, polydextrose, xylooligosaccharide, and probiotic supplementations were reported to be effective in modulating gut microbiota.

    “Dietary fibers, such as psyllium husk11, polydextrose15, xylooligosaccharide16, or probiotic supplementations17, were reported to be effective in modulating gut microbiota”

    From Effects of dietary fibers or probiotics on functional constipation symptoms and roles of gut microbiota: a double-blinded randomized placebo trial (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction calls polydextrose a prebiotic fiber but discusses bowel function, not measured changes in gut microbiota. The paper’s References list a separate study on polydextrose and faecal microbiota; this trial does not report whether polydextrose effectively modulated microbiota. Searched for microbiota, microflora, and related terms in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Harris L.A. Prevalence and ramifications of chronic constipation Manag. Care Interface 2005 18 23 30 16127889
  2. [8]Chey W.D. Symposium report: An evidence-based approach to ibs and cic: Applying new advances to daily practice: A review of an adjunct clinical symposium of the american college of gastroenterology meeting october 16, 2016. Las vegas, nevada Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017 13 1 PMC5495029 28729815
  3. [23]Drossman D.A. Dumitrascu D.L. Rome iii: New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2006 15 237 17013448
  4. [31]ICH Expert Working Group I.C.H. Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R1) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Geneva, Switzerland 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibarra, A., Pelipyagina, T., Rueffer, M., Evans, M., & Ouwehand, A. C.
Affiliations
  • DuPont (Finland) (FI)
  • KGK Synergize (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Ibarra, Alvin
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-02-20
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
439
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2916705561
Cited by
22
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
polydextrose, dietary fiber supplementation, functional constipation, colonic transit time, stool frequency, stool consistency, straining, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, Bowel Function Index, Rome III criteria
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Colon, Constipation, Defecation, Dietary Fiber, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gastrointestinal Transit, Glucans, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review