Cited by 20Sports Performance and TrainingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

An increase in fat mass index predicts a deterioration of running speed

Open access
Genton, Laurence, Mareschal, Julie, Karsegard, Véronique L., Achamrah, Najate, Delsoglio, Marta, Pichard, Claude, Graf, Christophe, Herrmann, François R.·2019·Nutrients

Abstract

A low fat mass is associated with a good running performance. This study explores whether modifications in body composition predicted changes in running speed. We included people who underwent several measurements of body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis between 1999 and 2016, at the “Course de l’Escalade”, taking place yearly in Geneva. Body composition was reported as a fat-free mass index (FFMI) and fat mass index (FMI). Running distances (men: 7.2 km; women: 4.8 km) and running times were used to calculate speed in km/h. We performed multivariate linear mixed regression models to determine whether modifications of body mass index, FFMI, FMI or the combination of FFMI and FMI predicted changes in running speed. The study population included 377 women (1419 observations) and 509 men (2161 observations). Changes in running speed were best predicted by the combination of FFMI and FMI. Running speed improved with a reduction of FMI in both sexes (women: ß −0.31; 95% CI −0.35 to −0.27, p < 0.001. men: ß −0.43; 95% CI −0.48 to −0.39, p < 0.001) and a reduction of FFMI in men (ß −0.20; 95% CI −0.26 to −0.15, p < 0.001). Adjusted for body composition, the decline in running performance occurred from 50 years onward, but appeared earlier with a body mass, FFMI or FMI above the median value at baseline. Changes of running speed are determined mostly by changes in FMI. The decline in running performance occurs from 50 years onward but appears earlier in people with a high body mass index, FFMI or FMI at baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11030701

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using normalizations for FM (e.g., fat mass index - FMI) may lead to different and partly contradictory results.

    “Using normalizations for FM (e.g., fat mass index - FMI) may lead to different and partly contradictory results [116].”

    From Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO consensus statement (2022) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Methods section defines FMI as fat mass divided by height squared, and the Results section reports that models using FMI and FFMI predicted running speed somewhat differently from a BMI model. But the paper does not show that normalizing fat mass produces contradictory results; its FMI findings consistently associate lower FMI with faster running. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The issue of normalization of FM by height is substantially less studied and may potentially lead to relevant differences in diagnosis and prevalence of SO.

    “While the group advocates normalization of skeletal muscle mass by body weight, the issue of normalization of FM by height is substantially less studied and may potentially lead to relevant differences in diagnosis and prevalence of SO.”

    From Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO consensus statement (2022) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Methods (§2.2; page unavailable) state that fat mass is divided by height squared to calculate fat mass index. The paper studies running speed, however; it does not establish that height normalization is less studied or that it may change the diagnosis or prevalence of sarcopenic obesity. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genton, L., Mareschal, J., Karsegard, V. L., Achamrah, N., Delsoglio, M., Pichard, C., Graf, C., & Herrmann, F. R.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Genton, Laurence
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
701
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925234987
Cited by
20
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
fat mass index, fat-free mass index, body composition, running speed, running performance, body mass index, aging, endurance running, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Running, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review