Cited by 32Body Composition Measurement TechniquesPhysical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds

Open access
Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel, Albaladejo-Saura, Mario, Luna-Badachi, Ana E., Esparza-Ros, Francisco·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relationship with the body mass index and sums of skinfolds measurement in kinanthropometry. A total of 2458 active adults participated in the study. Body mass index (BMI) and skinfolds were measured, and the Kerr, Durnin-Womersley, Faulkner and Carter equations were used to assess fat mass. Significant differences were found between all the formulas for the percentage of fat mass, ranging from 10.70 ± 2.48 to 28.43 ± 5.99% (p < 0.001) and fat mass from 7.56 ± 2.13 to 19.89 ± 4.24 kg (p < 0.001). The correlations among sums of skinfolds and the different equations were positive, high and significant in all the cases (r from 0.705 to 0.926 p < 0.001), unlike in the case of BMI, were the correlation was lower and both positive or negative (r from −0.271 to 0.719; p < 0.001). In conclusion, there were differences between all the formulas used to estimate fat mass; thus, for the evaluation of fat mass with kinanthropometry of an active adult, the use of the same formula is recommended on all occasions when the results are going to be compared or when an athlete is compared with a reference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17217777

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [29]Costa-Moreira O. Alonso-Aubin D.A. Patrocinio de Oliveira C.E. Candia-Luján R. de Paz J.A. Methods of assessment of body composition: An updated review of description, application, advanteges and disadvanteges AMD 2015 32 387 394
  2. [33]World Health Organization Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2010 26180873
  3. [36]Faulkner J. Physiology of swimming and diving Exercise Physiology Falls H. Academic Press Baltimore, MD, USA 1968
  4. [37]Carter J. Body composition of Montreal Olympic athletes Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes Part I: The Montreal Olympic Games Anthropological Project Carter J. Karger Basel, Switzerland 1982
  5. [46]Buskirk E.R. Underwater weighing and body density: A review of procedures Techniques for Measuring Body Composition Henschel J.B.a.A. National Academy od Sciences Washington, DC, USA 1961
  6. [52]Oviedo G. Marcano M. Morón de Salim A. Solano L. Exceso de peso y patologías en mujeres adultas Nutr. Hosp. 2007 22 358 362 17612378

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., Albaladejo-Saura, M., Luna-Badachi, A. E., & Esparza-Ros, F.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Sport, Catholic University San Antonio of Murcia (UCAM), Av. de los Jerónimos 135, 30107 Murcia, Spain
  • Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
Corresponding author
Esparza-Ros, Francisco
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
17
Issue
21
Pages
7777
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093865680
Cited by
32
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
fat mass estimation, skinfold thickness, body composition, body mass index, physically active adults, athletes
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Humans, Nutritional Status, Reference Values, Skinfold Thickness, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review