Cited by 64Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Fechner, Eva, Smeets, Ellen, Schrauwen, Patrick, Mensink, Ronald·2020·Nutrients

Abstract

Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) often differ in their diet composition, which may lead to conflicting results between randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of different degrees of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans. The experimental LCDs of 37 human trials were classified as (1) moderate-low CHO diets (<45–40 E%, n = 13), (2) low CHO diets (<40–30 E%, n = 16), and (3) very-low CHO diets (<30–3 E%; n = 8). Summary estimates of weighted mean differences (WMDs) in selected risk markers were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses. Differences between the LCD groups were assessed with univariate meta-regression analyses. Overall, the LCDs resulted in significant weight loss, reduced diastolic blood pressure BP, and increased total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), without significant differences between the three LCD groups. Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were found with the very-low CHO diets compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Decreases in triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations were more pronounced with the low and very-low CHO diets, compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Substitution of CHO by mainly saturated fatty acids (SFAs) increased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations. Except for LDL-C and TAGs, effects were not related to the degree of CHO restriction. Potential effects of nutrient exchanges should be considered when following LCDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu12040991

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduction in triglycerides was greatest for the very low-carbohydrate (<10% of calories from carbohydrates) diet: −24 mg/dL (95% CI: −38 to −9 mg/dL) when combined with weight loss (−1.62 kg).

    “The reduction in triglycerides was greatest for the very low-carbohydrate (<10% of calories from carbohydrates) diet: −24 mg/dL (95% CI: −38 to −9 mg/dL) when combined with weight loss (−1.62 kg) (65).”

    From 2021 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of ASCVD Risk Reduction in Patients With Persistent Hypertriglyceridemia (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    Section 3.3 reports a triglyceride (TAG) reduction of −0.27 mmol/L (95% CI −0.43 to −0.10), approximately −24 mg/dL (−38 to −9), and greater weight loss of −1.62 kg for its very-low-carbohydrate group. Section 3.4 shows this group had the largest triglyceride reduction. But Methods §2.3 defines the group as 3% to less than 30% of energy from carbohydrates, not exclusively less than 10%. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a systematic review and meta-analysis, all carbohydrate-restricted diets resulted in significant and similar weight loss from baseline but had different triglyceride-lowering effects.

    “In a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of different levels of carbohydrate restriction on body weight and cardiometabolic risk markers (65), all carbohydrate-restricted diets resulted in significant and similar weight loss from baseline but had different triglyceride-lowering effects.”

    From 2021 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of ASCVD Risk Reduction in Patients With Persistent Hypertriglyceridemia (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    Sections 3.4.1 and 3.4.4 report no statistically significant weight-loss differences among carbohydrate-restriction groups, but significant differences in triglyceride reductions. The weight-loss estimates compare restricted diets with moderate-carbohydrate diets; they do not establish that every diet produced significant weight loss from baseline. Section 3.2 notes that only six studies in its low-carbohydrate group showed significant weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [4]Bilsborough S.A. Crowe T.C. Low-carbohydrate diets: What are the potential short- and long-term health implications? Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003 12 396 404 14672862
  2. [5]EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Dietary Reference Values for nutrients. Summary Report EFSA Supporting Publ. 2017 14 e15121 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.e15121 · DOI
  3. [31]Wolfe B.M. Piche L.A. Replacement of carbohydrate by protein in a conventional-fat diet reduces cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in healthy normolipidemic subjects Clin. Investig. Med. 1999 22 140 148 10497712
  4. [43]Brehm B.J. Seeley R.J. Daniels S.R. D’Alessio D.A. A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003 88 1617 1623 10.1210/jc.2002-021480 12679447 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [60]Mensink R.P. Effects of Saturated Fatty Acids on Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins: A Systematic Review and Regression Analysis World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fechner, E., Smeets, E., Schrauwen, P., & Mensink, R.
Affiliations
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Mensink, Ronald
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
991
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014552459
Cited by
64
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, carbohydrate restriction, very low carbohydrate diet, cardiometabolic risk markers, weight loss, blood pressure, cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, saturated fatty acids, fat replacement, nutrient exchange
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Dietary Carbohydrates, Humans, Triglycerides, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review