Cited by 12Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Food Reward After Bariatric Surgery and Weight Loss Outcomes: An Exploratory Study

Open access
Guyot, Erika, Nazare, Julie-Anne, Oustric, Pauline, Robert, Maud, Disse, Emmanuel, Dougkas, Anestis, Iceta, Sylvain·2022·Nutrients

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Changes in food preferences after bariatric surgery may alter its effectiveness as a treatment for obesity. We aimed to compare food reward for a comprehensive variety of food categories between patients who received a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and to explore whether food reward differs according to weight loss. In this cross-sectional exploratory study, food reward was assessed using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ). We assessed liking and wanting of eleven food categories. Comparisons were done regarding type of surgery and Total Weight Loss (TWL; based on tercile distribution). Fifty-six patients (30 SG and 26 RYGB) were included (women: 70%; age: 44.0 (11.1) y). Regarding the type of surgery, scores were not significantly different between SG and RYGB, except for ‘non-dairy products – without color’ explicit liking (p = 0.04). Regarding TWL outcomes, explicit liking, explicit wanting and implicit wanting, scores were significantly higher for Good responders than Low responders for ‘No meat – High fat’ (post-hoc corrected p-value: 0.04, 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Together, our results failed to identify major differences in liking and wanting regarding the type of surgery and tended to indicate that higher weight loss might be related to a higher reward for high protein-content food. Rather to focus only on palatable foods, future studies should also consider a broader range of food items, including protein reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu14030449

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For both Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, there is a decrease in preference for high fat and calorie-dense foods and an increase in healthy food intake following bariatric surgery.

    “A recent study demonstrated that for both Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, there is a decrease in preference for high fat and calorie-dense foods and an increase in healthy food intake following bariatric surgery (46).”

    From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction reports lower lipid intake and greater consumption of healthy foods after bariatric surgery; the Discussion reports prior studies finding reduced preference for fat and calorie-dense foods after both procedures. But this paper’s own study was cross-sectional and assessed food reward after surgery, not changes from before surgery or healthy food intake. It therefore reports evidence for the claim rather than demonstrating the full claim itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guyot, E., Nazare, J.-A., Oustric, P., Robert, M., Disse, E., Dougkas, A., & Iceta, S.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Institut Paul Bocuse (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Dougkas, Anestis
  • Iceta, Sylvain
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
449
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4207007538
Cited by
12
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food reward, bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, obesity, weight loss, food preferences, food liking, desire to eat
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Reward, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review