Cited by 779Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Open access
Stice, Eric, Spoor, Sonja, Bohon, Cara, Veldhuizen, Marga G., Small, Dana M.·2008·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that obese individuals experience greater reward from food consumption (consummatory food reward) and anticipated consumption (anticipatory food reward) than lean individuals using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with 33 adolescent girls (mean age = 15.7, SD = 0.9). Obese relative to lean adolescent girls showed greater activation bilaterally in the gustatory cortex (anterior and mid insula, frontal operculum) and in somatosensory regions (parietal operculum and Rolandic operculum) in response to anticipated intake of chocolate milkshake (vs. a tasteless solution) and to actual consumption of milkshake (vs. a tasteless solution); these brain regions encode the sensory and hedonic aspects of food. However, obese relative to lean adolescent girls also showed decreased activation in the caudate nucleus in response to consumption of milkshake versus a tasteless solution, potentially because they have reduced dopamine receptor availability. Results suggest that individuals who show greater activation in the gustatory cortex and somatosensory regions in response to anticipation and consumption of food, but who show weaker activation in the striatum during food intake, may be at risk for overeating and consequent weight gain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013600

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In normal-weight controls, ACC and OFC activation during presentation of high-calorie food is negatively correlated with BMI.

    “in normal-weight controls, the activation of the ACC and OFC (regions involved in salience attribution that project into the NAc) during presentation of high-calorie food was found to be negatively correlated with their BMI (91).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Obese individuals exhibit less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption than lean individuals, but greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions that process palatability when anticipating consumption.

    “obese individuals exhibited less activation of reward circuits from actual food consumption (consummatory food reward) than lean individuals, whereas they showed greater activation of somatosensory cortical regions that process palatability when they anticipated consumption (91).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Genetic and other social and biological variables may contribute to vulnerability to obesity and weight gain.

    “genetic and other social and biological variables may also contribute towards vulnerability to obesity and weight gain”

    From Role of addiction and stress neurobiology on food intake and obesity (2018) · cites this paper as Stice, Spoor, Bohon, Veldhuizen, & Small, 2008

  • Both addicted and obese subjects show less activation of reward circuits when given the drug or palatable food, respectively.

    “Surprisingly, both addicted and obese subjects exhibit less activation of reward circuits when given the drug or the palatable food, respectively (45).”

    From The Addictive Dimensionality of Obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [45]

  • There is a considerable body of literature demonstrating differences in reward functions between lean and obese animals and humans.

    “There is a considerable body of literature demonstrating differences in reward functions between lean and obese animals and humans ([40](#B40), [162](#B162), [173](#B173), [174](#B174)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [173]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Temple JL Legerski C Giacomelli AM Epstein LH In Press Food is more reinforcing for overweight than lean children American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., Veldhuizen, M. G., & Small, D. M.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2008-11
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
924-935
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2158287537
Cited by
779
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 77
FWCI
29.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R1MH64560A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
food reward, obesity, gustatory cortex, insula, somatosensory cortex, caudate nucleus, adolescent girls, overeating, weight gain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Appetite, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Cues, Dominance, Cerebral, Eating, Female, Humans, Hunger, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Obesity, Reward, Taste, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review