Cited by 19Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Validation of a Smartphone Application for the Assessment of Dietary Compliance in an Intermittent Fasting Trial

Open access
Baum Martinez, Isabella, Peters, Beeke, Schwarz, Julia, Schuppelius, Bettina, Steckhan, Nico, Koppold-Liebscher, Daniela A., Michalsen, Andreas, Pivovarova-Ramich, Olga·2022·Nutrients

Abstract

Accurate dietary analysis of energy, nutrient intake, and meal timing in human studies using traditional dietary assessment methods (e.g., food records) is challenging and time-consuming. The widespread use of smartphones, tablets, and nutrition applications (apps) can overcome some of these problems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of an FDDB smartphone app and food database compared with PRODI®—a professional platform for nutritional counselling using the German Nutrient Database. Dietary records were collected from 10 subjects participating in the crossover intermittent fasting trial for 2 weeks at baseline and during the eating timeframe of 8 h (early or late in the course of the day). The FDDB app and database enabled a quicker and less sophisticated analysis of food composition and timing than the PRODI® software. Good agreement between the methods was found for energy and macronutrient intakes, while the FDDB data on most micronutrients and saturated/unsaturated fat intake were unreliable. In contrast to PRODI®, FDDB provided effective assessment of timely compliance, making it a promising tool for chrononutritional studies. Thus, the FDDB app is comparable to the traditional PRODI® dietary assessment method, and can be effectively used in human dietary trials and medical practice for specific goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu14183697

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baum Martinez, I., Peters, B., Schwarz, J., Schuppelius, B., Steckhan, N., Koppold-Liebscher, D. A., Michalsen, A., & Pivovarova-Ramich, O.
Affiliations
  • Research Group Molecular Nutritional Medicine, Department of Molecular Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Hasso Plattner Institute (DE)
  • Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-07
Volume
14
Issue
18
Pages
3697
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295007639
Cited by
19
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
  • German Science Foundation (DFG RA 3340/3-1)
  • German Diabetic Association (DFG RA 3340/3-1)
  • Adam Heller Funding (DFG RA 3340/3-1)
  • European Association for the Study of Diabetes (DFG RA 3340/3-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
mobile application, dietary assessment, intermittent fasting, dietary adherence, meal timing, food database, energy intake, macronutrient intake, micronutrient intake, chrononutrition, method validation
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Energy Intake, Diet, Fasting, Fats, Unsaturated, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records, Micronutrients, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review