Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MiR-219a-5p Enriched Extracellular Vesicles Induce OPC Differentiation and EAE Improvement More Efficiently Than Liposomes and Polymeric Nanoparticles

Osorio-Querejeta, Iñaki, Carregal-Romero, Susana, Ayerdi-Izquierdo, Ana, Mäger, Imre, Nash, Leslie A., Wood, Matthew, Egimendia, Ander, Betanzos, M., Alberro, Ainhoa, Iparraguirre, Leire, Moles, Laura, Llarena, Irantzu, Möller, Marco, Goñi-de-Cerio, Felipe, Bijelic, Goran, Ramos-Cabrer, Pedro, Muñoz-Culla, Maider, Otaegui, David·2020·Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Remyelination is a key aspect in multiple sclerosis pathology and a special effort is being made to promote it. However, there is still no available treatment to regenerate myelin and several strategies are being scrutinized. Myelination is naturally performed by oligodendrocytes and microRNAs have been postulated as a promising tool to induce oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation and therefore remyelination. Herein, DSPC liposomes and PLGA nanoparticles were studied for miR-219a-5p encapsulation, release and remyelination promotion. In parallel, they were compared with biologically engineered extracellular vesicles overexpressing miR-219a-5p. Interestingly, extracellular vesicles showed the highest oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation levels and were more effective than liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles crossing the blood–brain barrier. Finally, extracellular vesicles were able to improve EAE animal model clinical evolution. Our results indicate that the use of extracellular vesicles as miR-219a-5p delivery system can be a feasible and promising strategy to induce remyelination in multiple sclerosis patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020186

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic representation of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. Carriers with their main components and the type of miR219a-5p they were loaded with. Liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles were loaded with synthetic microRNA. In contrast, extracellular vesicles (EVs) contained biologically produced microRNA. Polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes were also loaded with a dye (coumarin and DiOC18, respectively) to perform up-take studies.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. Carriers with their main components and the type of miR219a-5p they were loaded with. Liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles were loaded with synthetic microRNA. In contrast, extracellular vesicles (EVs) contained biologically produced microRNA. Polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes were also loaded with a dye (coumarin and DiOC18, respectively) to perform up-take studies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Vehicles characterization: (A) Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. (B) Transmission electron cryomicroscopy images of the three vehicles showing correlation in size with NTA. (C) Levels of miR-219a-5p in liposomes (219-Lp), nanoparticles (219-Np) and Extracellular vesicles (219-EVs). Liposomes are the most enriched vehicles followed by nanoparticles and finally EVs.
Figure 2 Vehicles characterization: (A) Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. (B) Transmission electron cryomicroscopy images of the three vehicles showing correlation in size with NTA. (C) Levels of miR-219a-5p in liposomes (219-Lp), nanoparticles (219-Np) and Extracellular vesicles (219-EVs). Liposomes are the most enriched vehicles followed by nanoparticles and finally EVs.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Up-take and differentiation levels of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) after vehicles administration. (A) Uptake studies of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. Liposomes containing 3,3′-Dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate dissolved in chloroform (1mg/mL) (DOiC)18 (green) and mimic-Red (red), nanoparticles containing Coumarin (green) and mimic-Red (red) and EVs labelled with CM-DiL (red) are shown. Dapi (blue) was used to stain nucleus. Individual cells are imaged by confocal fluorescence microscopy of representative samples. (B) Percentage of OPCs that are able to take up each vehicle. Liposomes are the most efficient vehicle followed by polymeric nanoparticles and finally EVs. (C) Expression levels (expressed as de logarithm 2 of the fold change; Log2FC) of myelin related genes in OPC cultures treated with each vehicle compared to the same empty vehicle. EVs are the only vehicle able to induce OPC differentiation. Note the lack of PDGFRa and NG2 data in liposomes due to technical problems.
Figure 3 Up-take and differentiation levels of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) after vehicles administration. (A) Uptake studies of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles. Liposomes containing 3,3′-Dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate dissolved in chloroform (1mg/mL) (DOiC)18 (green) and mimic-Red (red), nanoparticles containing Coumarin (green) and mimic-Red (red) and EVs labelled with CM-DiL (red) are shown. Dapi (blue) was used to stain nucleus. Individual cells are imaged by confocal fluorescence microscopy of representative samples. (B) Percentage of OPCs that are able to take up each vehicle. Liposomes are the most efficient vehicle followed by polymeric nanoparticles and finally EVs. (C) Expression levels (expressed as de logarithm 2 of the fold change; Log2FC) of myelin related genes in OPC cultures treated with each vehicle compared to the same empty vehicle. EVs are the only vehicle able to induce OPC differentiation. Note the lack of PDGFRa and NG2 data in liposomes due to technical problems.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Transendothelial migration of liposomes and exosomes: Permeability of endothelial monolayer for liposomes and extracellular vesicles. Polymeric nanoparticles were not able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and are not, therefore, shown in the figure. EVs showed the highest levels of permeability, indicating that could be a proper candidate for microRNA delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). (*) p < 0.005 with respect to Liposomes values.
Figure 4 Transendothelial migration of liposomes and exosomes: Permeability of endothelial monolayer for liposomes and extracellular vesicles. Polymeric nanoparticles were not able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and are not, therefore, shown in the figure. EVs showed the highest levels of permeability, indicating that could be a proper candidate for microRNA delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). (*) p < 0.005 with respect to Liposomes values.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Intranasal administration of miR-219a-5p enriched exosomes promotes myelin regeneration. (A) Clinical evaluation of animals treated with non-enriched extracellular vesicles (Ne-EVs) and with miR-219a-5p enriched extracellular vesicles (219-EVs) (100 μg of EVs per dose; animals received two doses at days 2 and 8 after disease induction). 219-EVs treated animals showed a significant decrease in the clinical evaluation after the disease peak (n = 4). (B) MRI of spinal cord of a Ne-EVs treated animal and a 219-EVs treated mouse showing the fractional anisotropy (FA). (C) FA values of a section of the spinal cord of previous animals showing a decrease in FA values when treatment was Ne-EVs, indicating that remyelination is occurring. (D) No significant differences between both groups in pro-inflammatory cytokines were found, indicating that the effect induced by EVs was not related to an anti-inflammatory process.
Figure 5 Intranasal administration of miR-219a-5p enriched exosomes promotes myelin regeneration. (A) Clinical evaluation of animals treated with non-enriched extracellular vesicles (Ne-EVs) and with miR-219a-5p enriched extracellular vesicles (219-EVs) (100 μg of EVs per dose; animals received two doses at days 2 and 8 after disease induction). 219-EVs treated animals showed a significant decrease in the clinical evaluation after the disease peak (n = 4). (B) MRI of spinal cord of a Ne-EVs treated animal and a 219-EVs treated mouse showing the fractional anisotropy (FA). (C) FA values of a section of the spinal cord of previous animals showing a decrease in FA values when treatment was Ne-EVs, indicating that remyelination is occurring. (D) No significant differences between both groups in pro-inflammatory cytokines were found, indicating that the effect induced by EVs was not related to an anti-inflammatory process.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Agulla, 2014, In vivo theranostics at the peri-infarct region in cerebral ischemia, Theranostics, 4, 90, 10.7150/thno.7088 · DOI
  2. Alberro, A., Sáenz-Cuesta, M., Muñoz-Culla, M., Mateo-Abad, M., Gonzalez, E., Carrasco-Garcia, E., Araúzo-Bravo, M.J., Matheu, A., Vergara, I., and Otaegui, D. (2016). Inflammaging and frailty status do not result in an increased extracellular vesicle concentration in circulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17. · DOI
  3. Buyens, 2009, Elucidating the encapsulation of short interfering RNA in PEGylated cationic liposomes, Langmuir, 25, 4886, 10.1021/la803973p · DOI
  4. Dugas, 2010, Dicer1 and miR-219 Are Required for Normal Oligodendrocyte Differentiation and Myelination, Neuron, 65, 597, 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dulamea, 2017, The contribution of oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells to central nervous system repair in multiple sclerosis: Perspectives for remyelination therapeutic strategies, Neural Regen. Res., 12, 1939, 10.4103/1673-5374.221146 · DOI
  6. Fan, 2017, Transplanted miR-219-overexpressing oligodendrocyte precursor cells promoted remyelination and improved functional recovery in a chronic demyelinated model, Sci. Rep., 7, 41407, 10.1038/srep41407 · DOI
  7. Fletcher, 2010, T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, Clin. Exp. Immunol., 162, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04143.x · DOI
  8. Franklin, 2002, Why does remyelination fail in multiple sclerosis?, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 705, 10.1038/nrn917 · DOI
  9. Goldman, 2014, So many progenitors, so little myelin, Nat. Neurosci., 17, 483, 10.1038/nn.3685 · DOI
  10. Julián, P., Milon, P., Agirrezabala, X., Lasso, G., Gil, D., Rodnina, M.V., and Valle, M. (2011). The Cryo-EM Structure of a Complete 30S Translation Initiation Complex from Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol., 9. · DOI
  11. Kurte, 2015, Intravenous Administration of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induces a Switch from Classical to Atypical Symptoms in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis, Stem Cells Int., 2015, 140170, 10.1155/2015/140170 · DOI
  12. Liu, 2017, miR-219 attenuates demyelination in cuprizone-induced demyelinated mice by regulating monocarboxylate transporter 1, Eur. J. Neurosci., 45, 249, 10.1111/ejn.13485 · DOI
  13. Livak, 2001, Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method, Methods, 25, 402, 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lunavat, 2016, RNAi delivery by exosome-mimetic nanovesicles—Implications for targeting c-Myc in cancer, Biomaterials, 102, 231, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.024 · DOI
  15. Medina-Rodríguez, E.M., Arenzana, F.J., Bribián, A., and de Castro, F. (2013). Protocol to isolate a large amount of functional oligodendrocyte precursor cells from the cerebral cortex of adult mice and humans. PLoS ONE, 8. · DOI
  16. Melo, 2014, Cancer Exosomes Perform Cell-Independent MicroRNA Biogenesis and Promote Tumorigenesis, Cancer Cell, 26, 707, 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.005 · DOI
  17. Fuentes, 2015, White matter injury restoration after stem cell administration in subcortical ischemic stroke, Sci. Rep., 6, 44433
  18. Pusic, 2014, Youth and environmental enrichment generate serum exosomes containing miR-219 that promote CNS myelination, Glia, 62, 284, 10.1002/glia.22606 · DOI
  19. Raposo, 2013, Extracellular vesicles: Exosomes, microvesicles, and friends, J. Cell Biol., 200, 373, 10.1083/jcb.201211138 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sork, 2018, Heterogeneity and interplay of the extracellular vesicle small RNA transcriptome and proteome, Sci. Rep., 8, 10813, 10.1038/s41598-018-28485-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Boussac, 2001, Proteomic Analysis of Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Secreted Subcellular Compartment Distinct from Apoptotic Vesicles, J. Immunol., 166, 7309, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7309 · DOI
  22. Tian, 2014, A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy, Biomaterials, 35, 2383, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.083 · DOI
  23. Valadi, 2007, Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 654, 10.1038/ncb1596 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ventola, 2017, Progress in Nanomedicine: Approved and Investigational Nanodrugs, Pharm. Ther., 42, 742
  25. Willms, 2018, Extracellular Vesicle Heterogeneity: Subpopulations, Isolation Techniques, and Diverse Functions in Cancer Progression, Front. Immunol., 9, 738, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00738 · DOI
  26. Yu, X., Odenthal, M., and Fries, J.W.U. (2016). Exosomes as miRNA carriers: Formation-function-future. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17. · DOI
  27. Zhuang, 2011, Treatment of brain inflammatory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain, Mol. Ther., 19, 1769, 10.1038/mt.2011.164 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Osorio-Querejeta, I., Carregal-Romero, S., Ayerdi-Izquierdo, A., Mäger, I., Nash, L. A., Wood, M., Egimendia, A., Betanzos, M., Alberro, A., Iparraguirre, L., Moles, L., Llarena, I., Möller, M., Goñi-de-Cerio, F., Bijelic, G., Ramos-Cabrer, P., Muñoz-Culla, M., & Otaegui, D.
Venue
Pharmaceutics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-21
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
186
ISSN
1999-4923
Cited by
85
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI17/00189 and DTS15/00069)
  • Gipuzkoa Regional Council (DFG 15/006)
  • European Regional Development Fund (PI17/00189 and DTS15/00069)
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (RIS3/DTS/2018222025)
  • Spanish Estate Reserach Agency (SAF2017-87670-R)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review